Alvron
-
Posts
3193 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Alvron
-
Not so. With a kill today, it drops to 6 players which means generic protect, kill or roleblock actions drop to 0% In the interest of knowing who can do what, I'm a Sparker with full charge. So if needed I can vote on someone and learn who they targeted during N2. This does mean that my vote will have to be on someone that wouldn't be exed but it does give us options.
-
Well chulldung. I really didn't like the votes on JNV but clearly it was correct. I've never had much if any luck trying to do things logically. I much prefer a good random stab in the dark. Too bad I'm likely to be roleblocked and/or killed this Night or I would give it another shot. Who knows, maybe I will. However, since we are now under 10 players, some generic actions (kill, roleblock and protect) only have a 50% chance of going through even if we are the only ones placing those particular orders. Wei, sorry for voting you. It was a random vote due to me running out of time and since I knew it wouldn't count as I was filling, I figured it wouldn't hurt. Araris, how dare you be village. Or at least appear very much village. Izzy wants you to be evil so be evil k?
-
You haven't played with me much, but some players will want me dead simply for who I am. I have no issue with randomly killing which as you can see has the habit of taking out elims so the elims wanting me removed early is kinda normal. Especially if they happen to be someone I've done it to before. (Araris, Steel or Elandera for example) I haven't really been paying attention this cycle due to work and life so my vote will not be very informed. Like at all. I made a long post about why I didn't trust Araris based on his vote disappearing and Archer revealing he has a PMM with them but after checking the rules, it turns out my reasoning was wrong so I scrapped it and have now run out of time to write up another post so I'm going to go with my second suspicion and vote for Wei. Hopefully I can explain more when I get back in about 6 hours.
-
I really hope that wasn’t the case. The elims killing someone that had a vote on them is normally bad as it removes someone who players were already suspicious of. Better to let them live and try for a mis-exe next cycle.
-
Archer, I did receive confirmation that I killed Stick. However it is also possible that if anyone else placed orders to kill Stick then they might also receive confirmation. The odds of another choosing to target Stick is fairly slim though. But then, slim odds are what I do best so don’t count it out.
-
Normally I wouldn't do this as it ruins the fun of everyone trying to work it out while I sit back smiling but storm it, I want to. I killed Stick! Or at least, I placed orders for Stick to be killed.
-
There is a very good chance of this.
-
Since there is a no vote minimum this round, why do you think there will be no death? Even if all votes are removed, someone is still going to die.
-
Only when I can. Strange how when I have the ability to kill, you end up evil....
-
With syrup?
-
I'm sad.
-
But I left with it.
-
Having never seen any of the shows mentioned, I'm just going to pop in to claim the win and leave.
-
Current suspicion list: (and hopefully with reasons that others can understand what I'm trying to say) Archer compliments me which feels like a pocketing attempt by targeting my ego, (which works btw) then next sentence says they are against attempted pocketings. I am suspicious and flattered. Wei is not being the Wei I remember which is sad. I liked that Wei. Due to the fairly drastic change in playstyle since I last played with them, I am a little suspicious of Wei but I know where that suspicion comes from so I'm kinda ignoring it. Maybe. A little. Ish. Still suspicious of Araris because it's Araris. They fly under peoples radar most of the time, including mine more often than I like to admit, so I tend to try and keep a suspicious eye on them. TUN is my main suspicion. Yes their playstyle has changed since I last played with them and I don't know the current style which should by rights place them into the same category as Wei but it's their question about roleless that still raises red flags for me. It is a question that I have asked myself when I've been evil for the very reason that it seems like a village thing to ask. I admit that there is likely nothing that will dissuade me from that point of suspicion and it will likely colour my reads further down the line. Not concerned about those suspicious of me as that's a good thing imo. Players being suspicious of me means my playstyle hasn't changed too much during my absence. I always try to look suspicious in order to keep my alignment hidden no matter what side I'm on. Makes it easier to be set up for a mis-exe but it also helps me hide when I am an elim. Vote Tally: Araris (1): Archer Ash (1): Araris Striker (1): Xino Mat (1): Stick TUN (1): Wei JNV (1): Mat Archer (1): Alv I would like to point out that despite what it says in the rules and what some are saying in thread about there needing 2 votes for a exe, the write up does say that there is no vote minimum for this cycle. I suspect that is due to the low player count combined with all the vote manipulation roles. So those with votes on them, you are on the chopping block. Currently going to vote for Archer as he is the only one I'm currently suspicious of and doesn't have a vote. Plus I don't dare break a tie.
-
Thank you fellow initiate of the Gods of Luck and Chance. It is nice to be back however brief it might be. Since TUN is/was TUO, I'm both more suspicious of them and less for asking about roleless claims. If they were evil, they would know or greatly suspect that there are no roleless but at same time asking about them just seems like something an elim would bring up to help narrow down the power player lists. I don't really see a villager wanting to know or care about roleless as that would only help the elims and have no benefit to the village.
-
TUN, you wouldn't have happened to have been The Unknown Order at an earlier point? It's been a while since I've played so I'm not sure if you changed your name or are a new (to me) player with a similar name. I admit it's causing some disjointedness as I keep comparing what you're saying with what I remember about TUO. Archer and Elandera, please don't bad mouth the Gods of Luck and Chance, or RNG as the unenlightened like to say. They are neither fickle nor evil. They are after all, the only pure unbiased beings in existence. As for game related stuff, I am currently a little suspicious of both Araris and The Unknown Novel. Will wait and see before voting on either of them just yet though.
-
Izzy Dedyet is signing up. Izzy swears she won't burn down the Synod meeting place this time. Or was it that this is the time she burnt it down during a failed sacrifice to the Gods of Luck and Chance? Time will tell. Maybe.
-
Congratz on both the 100 games played and the finishing of your spreadsheet. A couple of notes. In QF3 you were killed by Theorymaker. In LG24 Burnt killed you and she was a hidden Elim role. LG36 Joe the Elim killed you. QF56 you died as the Sacrifice was voted for which resulted in everyone dying but them. Wish I could fill in more of the blanks but sadly some of the Docs I no longer have access too, or they never existed. Also, you've been evil 24 times. Fantastic. One more and you will pass me. If anyone deserves to take my throne, it's you. Or Devotary. Either of you two works quite well.
-
I be the Keymaster.
-
I would rather not die on my birthday if at all possible.
-
But if they're claiming Sage then we shouldn't vote for them. Keeping the Sage out of the execution phase means they're free to reveal the Keymaster.
-
Statically speaking anyone is probably a Commoner. 12 players with 3 non commoner roles means everyone has a 75% chance of being a Commoner. TUO, I was unable to answer your question last round due to it ending and all. I nominated you because you already had one vote (in thread at least) so the smart choice was to vote on you (or anyone with a public vote) to increase your odds of being selected which lowered both mine and Droughts odds. Not that it mattered in the end.
-
I vote yes. This is likely the only game I'll be able to play for the rest of the year so I would like it to continue.
-
It's very logical. Since I'm not a nominee this round, it allowed me to reveal Drought as the Keymaster which means there should be no chance of them being voted out killing everyone. If I hadn't revealed then Drought could've been killed and the game ended first cycle. (I did consider that btw but decided against it) This has the added benefit of reducing/refuting false claims. However if I was nominated then I likely wouldn't have revealed as that would guarantee my death so it would not be in my best interest to reveal my role. Thankfully it worked out this round. I voted for TUO and I'm very interested in learning who voted for me....
-
For this cycle at least, can't touch me.
