Immortal Platypus

I'M SO FRIKIN DONE WITH STUPID DEBATE AND STUPID LAY JUDGES AND ANNOYING OPPONENTS. "Both did a good job. But the neg sounds a little more convincing to me." I NEED FEEDBACK IF I'M TO IMPROVE! different round: "The aff position made fewer repetitive answers." THAT LITERALLY SHOULD NOT MATTER, EXCEPT THAT IT MEANS THAT WE ATTACKED THEM IN MORE DIVERSE AREAS THAN THEY ATTACKED US WHICH SHOULD ACTUALLY BE A BENEFIT TO US! "The neg side, though incredibly thought out and presented ,were less clear on the "critical thinking "cross answers." a) THAT SHOULDN'T MATTER AS CROSS TECHNICALLY ISN'T SUPPOSED TO BE FLOWED AND b) EVEN IF IT WAS FLOWED YOUR WHOLE DECISION SHOULDN'T BE BASED ON ONE SMALL DETAIL, ESPECIALLY ON A RELATIVELY UNIMPORTANT POINT. THAT WASN'T EVEN OUR MAIN POINT, IT WAS A DIFFERENT ONE THAT THEY DIDN'T ATTACK! different round: actually, I really liked that judge and feedback and we definitely deserved to lose.