Jump to content

The Unknown Medallion

Members
  • Posts

    4244
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by The Unknown Medallion

  1. I disagree. All lurchers should be on me. With regards for how many there are.
  2. I believe Archer is making a case for why he isn't elim by chosing an unprovable role that the elims could very well have. Useless?
  3. First of all, no direct quoting from PMs, just paraphrasing. This doesn't actually help, although it does mean Archer wasn't looking looking for who you were going to kill. Not revealing this second player is not helpful, one of them/Archer kind of has to be e. If they aren't it suggests a very high risk appetite.
  4. How did you do this? @EveryoneExceptTUN,
  5. I don't like this, sure v!Archer could have just made a mistake, but all e!Archer had to do was know who you were going after. I think I'm going to go Archer (Da(n=n)ex) for how their Da(n=n)ex points were faulty and now that the Da(n=n)ex train is likely to go through, Archer reserves Mat as a place to move their vote in the future, which assumimg Archer is e, Da(n=n)ex is very likely flip vil. Was there anyone he seemed to not want to kill?
  6. I think they aren't e/e because Archer probably would have retracted his vote if they were, but v/e, e/v, and v/v are all possible. Since I'm e!reading both a decent bit, I'm thinking it's not v/v.
  7. My pool of elims is looking something like Da(n=n)ex, Illwei, Bookwyrm, and slightly Mat for being a consensus elim read that I read as neutral. Even though I agree with the end result, the way Archer is going after Da(n=n)ex feels a little odd, so toss them in as the same willingness to exe as Mat. Tiered: Illwei (Maybe equal with Bookwyrm) Da(n=n)ex/Bookwyrm (Da(n=n)ex preferred) Mat/Archer (Mat preferred) Archivist (almost true null, but I've gotten a slightly negative tone from a couple posts. Willing to chalk it up to newbieness though) I'll dismiss Illwei for now since they don't seem to be widely elim read. Da(n=n)ex voted for Bookwyrm and seems to be aiming for a mix on them, so not e/e. Out of those two I prefer Da(n=n)ex, so I think that's where I'll place my vote. Why are people v!reading Archer and Illwei exactly? I kinda get the feeling they're being effort cleared, which maybe for Illwei, but definitely not for Archer, and effort clearing isn't very good in general anyways.
  8. I'm to the point where I actually have reads (don't ask me to spell them out, I just have them), and the only one I really would have been fine with voting was JNV. The thread attitude didn't seem really for JNV until as Mat said, 2:59:30.
  9. I'm not liking Illwei’s tone. It isn't necessarily elim, but something feels weird about it.
  10. Odium is technically an English word, but unlike most others it was stolen wholesale from Latin without any changes.
  11. What's up with that list of names? Why only those people.
  12. Because the kills are differentiated in the writeup proper, and it says Alv was killed by Spiked.
  13. So Stick and obviously Wizard were the Coinshot kills, that was way harder than it should have been for me to figure out.
  14. Coinshot vs elim kill? @Araris Valerian
  15. Not that I'm complaining, but any reasoning?
  16. I'm edging towards this just being how Archer pinch-hits, but if anything it's e!indicative since he did the same thing when pinch-hitting for e!kas in the Alcatraz LG.
  17. What did Stick claim? I didn't see that.
  18. Honestly, this is pretty normal. We're lucky we have enough people this game that we can lose three villagers and not have that big of an impact.
  19. I think the best option is still Araris Valerian. Prove me wrong.
  20. Very clear difference I think.
×
×
  • Create New...