Jump to content

The Unknown Character

Members
  • Posts

    4260
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by The Unknown Character

  1. Wouldn't we get 4 normally, so long as 2 out of the first 3 are e? Burnt I'm comfortable assuming it's not a Drake/Hael team, as the elims said they wish to concede this night and not the previous one/they had a real chance before they killed Drake. If Doc/Drake e/e, there's no reason to say Hael is e. Either say he's v and exe v!Stick or say you went rogue and scanned someone else v or e or scanned Stick e coincidentally, really he could do anything else and it would make infinitely more sense That means there isn't a logical world where Drake is e, meaning Stick is e. Mist isn't relevant because we won the loop, that means that it's actually two of (Coco, Twin, Stick) and the last elim is either Doc or Hael Now here's where my own feelings come in, though I think they're fairly factual If the team is Stick/Hael, I don't think he relays the dead doc's message until he comes under more direct fire. He claimed before a vote was even on him. If it's Stick/Doc on the other hand, his actions make sense. Potentially because of timezones, potentially not, he doesn't claim until after Hael and particularly after people believe Hael. Theoretically a better play might be saying he scanned Drake as e, but that could have cast suspicion on him for being a loose cannon and makes sense as to why it was not chosen. Mechanically, I lean more towards e!Doc mechanically but more towards e!Hael tonally In conclusion, I think we exe Stick next. Then we need to decide which of (Coco, Twin, Doc, Hael) we're more confident in, especially if we don't get that leeway exe that we would normally have. Could people reiterate why we exed Twin? I don't remember the reasonings that cycle very well.
  2. Stick eliminated twice as many teams as Hael, and the only teams that Stick didn't eliminate require the elims to make a nonsensical kill
  3. If I had a nickel for every player that doesn't seem to realize we did exe the outed elim, I'd have like three nickels, which isn't a lot, but it's still enough to annoy me Not actually annoyed, but that EoD was a scary read
  4. We should roleblock Doc in case he bought the rez mask, but I believe I know what Mist is referring to and he's right other than that one concern
  5. No wait this is true We shouldn't exe Doc/Hael, because one of Drake/Stick is e, and one of them is dead. Doc/Hael is a 50/50 of hitting one elim, exing Stick is a 100% chance of having one elim dead If we haven't exed an elim yet, there is no reason to kill Drake, as the elims would have the win locked. If we have exed one elim, we need one more to be dead. We have two pairs that each have an elim, but only one of those pairs already has a dead player @Wahrheitswächter @Araris Valerian @|TJ| @Wonko the Sane @Mistfallen Soldier @Divergent @Archer Feel free to correct me here, but the only world I see where this doesn't work is Hael/Drake, in which case the elims just decided to give us a chance where we had none
  6. Not referencing this but it's nice to have out in the open I have the Mask of Scents myself Edit: (TJ visited no one last night)
  7. What worlds would it eliminate if Doc and Hael were absolutely 100% not e/e for reasons
  8. I can confirm that Can someone remind me who Hael's teammate would be, hypothetically? Lol, I was being vague enough that it would be hard to figure out
  9. @Wahrheitswächter I kinda want to say the thing, if you know what I mean Edit: I don't think not having this info out would help that much
  10. I didn't believe this before, but this post seems like such a lie to me Mind sharing how it's accurate?
  11. But wait, I had the "Failed to Buy a Mask" last loop, but I got it again this one
  12. Care to share your code word Burnt? I think I'm willing to clear Mist and Doc12 here, and I think we should ignore the dead group l2 to go after Haelbarde just in case.
  13. Did you get your approvals or do I need to look at it again?
  14. Know, I guess I'm just iffy on who’s Burnt's teammate. Twin makes enough sense I guess, I was largely reacting to the previous votecount with you at number two, but looking back I think Twin is 2nd now It's something I've noticed, in flipless games, players always assume dead players are village, no matter how good of reason they had to exe them
  15. I do not like the state of votes currently. I don't really like the idea of voting someone who could be a Mask holder, but Burnt especially so because she only dies if v!, but if she's v so is Coco making us lose. On the other hand, I actually do just straight up think Burnt and Coco are e/e (with one of TJ/Doc, depending on who has the Stone Mask). More thoughts later
  16. Kinda just do think Burnt is e, but the argument for the kill last loop is the argument for the kill this loop, if they kill Ash three times, they can potentially steal a 100 Rupee mask
  17. Must have mixed up the old versions If you agree vote each other, the Mask holder will have the vote on them removed, as well as the vote on the person they voted. If the Bremen soothes the third person, it could still be any of you. If you vote different people, Bremen will make it at most two suspects, potentially only one if an additional person votes each of you Well I say Confirmed village equals Confirmed right, and since I'm Confirmed that must be true
  18. I find it amusing that me and Hael presumably both went for alliterative codes Actually, no, it just means they didn't Equip last night. We'll check again today, incase votes don't work for some reason Actually, @Doc12, @Mistfallen Soldier, @Burnt Spaghetti, don't vote each other as that leaves you open to the Bremen (mildly sus of Doc for suggesting it). You should vote separate people who are not up for the exe or Stone Mask candidates
  19. Also, to whoever sent me what I can only assume is a puzzle of some sort, uh, screw you too?
  20. That was me actually I didn't know PMs were unsigned. Could you spoiler the code phrase for *reasons* please?
×
×
  • Create New...