Illwei

it's not even a tie anymore my efforts are meaningless ;-; Liranil

Reading Which is why it's like- Why is Matrim, someone who often has the same thoughts as me- weirded out that two players are having similar thoughts :P. I think that the reasoning on TUO is...??? but I'm not gonna- I'm not gonna try for another last minute switch >> that...worked so well last time >> I'm just gonna...Leave yall till D2 because apparently no one liked my idea of leaving it to complete RNG :P. I hate day 1s so I'm gonna do the ignore and come back later :P. EDIT: Liranil @Straw

I had something quoted here. I did. It's been hours now and I don't know what it was >> so uh Matrim You seem more laid back in a way? idk not a statement on your alignment, just a statement. I'm gonna come back to the thread tomorrow. Right now.... Back to Reading @Shard of Reading uh something else right. Reading is in the game, right? I'm not being an Idiot rn? :P.

It's just like, your thoughts were "why contradict someone, even if you think their reasoning is wrong, if they have the same conclusion as you?" That just doesn't feel right to me at all, like- at all. Idk.

Okay, so I don't agree with TUO saying that mat looks tunnell-y, but this: This just feels like an incredibly Elimmy mindset I can't get it off my mind Matrim

I mean, I just know that I've definitely done that before. Contradicted myself in arguing with someone else that is? because when someone else presents the same argument as you, I feel like it's easier to poke holes in it than it is to poke holes in a theory you've crafted yourself. EDIT: I'd been mentioned by me >>

I don't like this statement? I mean, opinions change? if everyone came into the game with thier set opinions and never changed them, it wouldn't be that fun of a game :P. we're throwing Ideas out and then basically asking people to disprove them. Danex gave some reasoning that TUO didn't agree with, so he countered it. He's not trying to get people to believe him with Faulty evidence. I'm giving town points for that.

Smh legitimately offended that I'm not the first person you think of here ;-; /s *googles* > the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories. Haha a solo doc in a solo doc

Was danex then a mistborn in LG72...no that don't- this conversation is meaningless xD Okay basically my point was as two people who haven't rolled vanilla, that may be why they assume more roles than I think there are. EDIT: TUO/Illwei Elim team confirmed

I was trying to think of games that Danex has been vanilla :P. MR46 - idk LG71 - Mistborn maybe? er.... LG72 - Truthless QF50 - Brown Ajah Idk, I don't keep tabs on everybody :ph34r; Yeah i know I could check the stats sheet but see the thing is I just don't want to :P.

Aviar don't protect from the...*ahem*...grinch, and Trappers hitting Elims is unlikely, with only one shot, so I don't think that Aviars matter here. I also don't think there's a 5 Elim team :P. Could it possibly be this? : Kinda feels like an attempt to seem more village. I chalk it up to two players who have played Role Madness games :P. Danex was in....MR 46 and LG71...I don't think he had a role in those? idk. Wait. Was Danex a mistborn in LG71? right? idk. so it's...that thing where like, you get a role every game, so you assume that others also have it? not confirmation bias....er...idk. ...? thought you just said it was likely ? Straw isn't going to assign roles to specific people (>>) it's gonna be RNG'd, so- ? EDIT: ..is it confirmation bias???

Again I say...that's...a quarter of the people here?? you think that a quarter of the game are doctors? And another Quarter Messengers? I don't think this is Role Madness :P.

;). Okay okay okay. On one hand, this is incredibly strange reasoning :P. On the other hand, this feels like it comes from a villager. (oh look Based!Danex? again? how interesting :P) Maybe it's just the fact that I can't read, but I've definitely missed posts before. The less actions I have to remember to submit, the better >> Also straw seems to like larger Elim teams, should we be theorizing a team of five >> Also I was legit thinking something like "smh this is my backwards game" smh :P. me? Poke voting? Setup Spec? Actually trying to understand the rules? something's off here... xD. Okay and? Your vote's already on me why would I care what you think of me? Because my vote's on you, maybe? It... probably won't stay. I'd like more time to get a better read of you. I'm absolutely confused by this exchange??? ??? Smh Missing my vote on DeTess. I went through to see who hasn't talked in thread, and...3/4 of yall have??? why when I think of the thread then, do I only think of Mat and Quinn? What's the line between posting enough to encourage activity, and posting too much that people feel overwhelmed by the thread. *sigh*. @Shard of Reading Reading

smhmh DeTess Hm, I mean, I know it's not pure rng but it's a like 1/15 chance that they actually hit the person submitting the kill, no? so I don't think that's an incredibly important sabotage? I feel like that's more reasonable late game. It lasts 3 cycles, so it's not like it would just be sabotaged for the one cycle. I agree with the aviar- unless Straw for some reason made everyone Aviar holders, then I think it's not that big of a deal for the Elims to try and work around them? it's like the 1/15 thing I guess it's lower because i't'd be 1/12 or 2/12 but there's still- I don't think that would be a priority idk I started writing this like 10 hours ago and in switching tabs I found it again...if my sentences make no sense it's because they were finished at different times okay I take no responsibility :P.

Wait wait it's 10 til and who's protecting

:P. 2-4?????? I can think two maybe, but a whole quarter of us being doctors is just wayyyyy too much for what I'm thinking. I also hate doing setup spec. butttt aaaanyways- See: all the times the Elims get given an alignment scanner :P. This again feels like too much to me??? idk, 3 role scanners is a lot for a 16 person game Imo. Doctor and bookkeeper make sense to me, but I don't see the use of an Elim!Aviar Holder, but afdhlgkjd that doesn't mean they weren't given one. I mean, kinda use, but at the same time it would only be appliccable for trappers, and they only have one kill- so not that difficult to avoid, imo? Inb4 Illwei flips Elim!Aviar Holder I would also like to know this >:). awwww ;-; I, too, love the Terms of Service.

Guys Amazing Idea here that I forgot to mention before No one votes, we let D1 be complete RNG. :D.

Illwei's DMs exposed!

It's been less than an hour, give them time, smh xD. :ph34r; heheheheheheheheheh I thought you voted on yourself in QF50- no wait no you didn't did you. I voted on you, and then you asked me to unvote :P. Yeah I don't remember any other time either?? :P.

Get back to me in like, cycle 4 :P. Welcome to the show where Illwei can't reference things because ongoing game hehehehehehehe

Smh it makes you Quinn, smh. :P. Good good I'm in favor of this :P. Kwinny Quinn See here guys, Poke voting works! just like I always say! :D.

smh so serious "pending further evidence" where's the chaotic Kwinny I know and love? ;-; Kwinny EDIT: This, but like, I'll just let yalls do the speculation and I'll speculate on your speculation :P. *patiently waits for gears to do his rules things"

"use it well" sounds like such a strange thing to say?? so performative or whatnot. Or perhaps just jealousy? :P. Now you're not assuming that?

Gears, wahddya mean? i went through connie's posts and showed that Elim!her wouldn't have lied :P.

mmmm 22 minutes? :P. EDIT: @Araris Valerian Went through your D3 posts, nothing about how much defence we had at all?