Jump to content

Illwei

Members
  • Posts

    3479
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Illwei

  1. I figure they're really village and you're trying to pull a gambit like aman and fifth did
  2. If I did then wouldn't i find them to be a village thug? I mean, that's what you told me all along
  3. I'd comment about you calling this shining but it's just outing isn't it lol
  4. Finally someone posted lol mat
  5. Besides that, why do you think people shouldn't vote you EDIT: Okay I can't hold this in anymore. Last night I rolled seeker and mat is an Elim. I wanted to try and find his partners because I didn't think i could get people to exe him but i am having the most difficult time coming up with that world and i need help
  6. You can't replace danex with TUN but you can replace danex with Shining, is my thoughts right now.
  7. Danex I'm getting a feeling that the team is something like Mat/Whysper/Danex...
  8. But you don't think That Archer could be replaced with Whysper?
  9. What's the three other people who you think are the Elims then @The Unknown Novel
  10. TUN is the only one who's' role is unknown, probably a thug EDIT: implying that the lack of resistance on him isn't AI probably. If the elims have 2 thugs and no one else then there's a chance of winning but if the team is 5 and they have two thugs and a third we can't win this.
  11. I have something I'd like to claim but I'd need to find the action claim to make it worth claiming, so again, if anyone wanted to report actions to me I'd appreciate that a lot.
  12. If anyone wanted to send me action claims in PMs I would appreciate that. I'm specifically looking for one thing from last night. something I think can get us a potential clear. I think if there's not another lurcher, then Archer/Cin is a difference check. No one is going to give the Elims a coinshot without giving the village a lurcher, and no one is going to give the village a coinshot without giving the elims a lurcher, even though the rioter is somewhat helpful in that regard. Regardless, I think we're in a good enough position at the moment.
  13. Am I tin(eye)foiling an archer/cin team? yes. is it silly? yes. Mat EDIT: yes, I rolled tineye. Yes, I'm upset about it. lol.
  14. Yeah, linked earlier by someone (shining i think idk) on p1/2
  15. @Matrim's Dice you said earlier that you felt like that post from Archivist was coached. if you had to pick someone, who would you say coached them to post that?
  16. sounds like a good plan, i think we got this game in the bag
  17. Ok lets try this again, all lurchers should be on me, regardless of how many there are?
  18. Just kidding, if there's another lurcher you should be on me, Archer should be on himself or wtv idc
  19. No one else claim, if there's another lurcher you should protect archer, if there's no other lurchers I should be protected.
  20. Archer you were not in threat of dying, why did you claim?
  21. Hey Cin, why do you feel like posting unedited posts? From previous cycles? In the future, if you're village here, it's more beneficial to just post an edited version that's relevant to the presence. In my mind you're doing it to show that you had thoughts last cycle and weren't just frozen not knowing what to think or do. I think that's less useful to the village then having coherent posts. When you post like that you give openings for people to push on things that aren't there. Or maybe they are-that's my issue. Also do not quote from PMs. even providing timestamps from them (like Archer did last cycle, I really just wanted a general time) is borderline imo. Anyways @Archer wasnt it theoretically 7v4 yesterday? I thought there was 11 or am I incapable of counting EDIT: I see now, it's a recap of a conversation
  22. This is mildly where I'm at, with Whysper, TUN, Bookwyrm and then cin as a conditional
  23. That's a good counterpoint Also he didn't lean elim on stick, he had her as null.
  24. We didn't have three trains with moving parts, we had three people with like 2 votes each and people obviously not feeling threatened because of it. @Shining Silhouette there's a level 0 tell that can work on new players called the rule of three, it's not damning but it feeds on my mat suspicion and the annoyance he's showing right now at having voted out an elim by supposed luck. but since stick and turtle were both village, mat's the 3.
×
×
  • Create New...