Jump to content

Emerald Falcon

RP Accounts
  • Posts

    471
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Emerald Falcon

  1. Why, if you believe Gorilla is a villager here, would you not just be happy about people off wagon in hopes that they don't vote her?
  2. What do you infer my intentions were then? 30 minutes before the cycle closes isn't an ideal time for anything.
  3. To be quite honest, I haven't been /trying/ to cause confusion at all this game. I've been actively trying to play more lawful which I thought should have been obvious, and yet here we are Edit: Honestly, I think I have to side with coral here. Like, yes, we're talking about me so I'm biased, but justifying my vote on croc wasn't necessary at all in that situation regardless of my alignment. I can't help but think this interaction moves amber down in my reads.
  4. I think it's funny, because I've been trying to keep my chaotic tendencies at bay. Then I forget for a moment and claim PMs with coral and mauve, or slide into Ostrich DMs and try to convince him I'm a teammate of Kat's
  5. @Oxblood Beagle I didn't place a vote because I didn't think it was necessary. I strongly felt that we should be exploring other paths, so I didn't want to build the wagon on Kat more than it needed. I will say that even though it isn't AI, your take on me is perfectly valid- the condemnation without a vote and whatnot. I don't follow the reasoning based on the seeker people and you seem to have, I assumed it was clear I was playing off of Kat and even clearer if you read the summary of mine and Kat's PM. @Charcoal Hyena I haven't read the whole thing yet but skimmed and I don't recall Kat saying I was in village meta? In his readslist he states that he...has no read on me?
  6. Someone called out tonight, So I'm going to be at work until almost Rollover today. Was hoping to get out some stuff but I'm just not very proficient in mobile posting.
  7. One can only try so hard to put out content that should be easy to engage with. Also Meerkat is Lassie and I am Shawn, I take no criticism (constructive or otherwise) Ostrich can be like, Juliet or something idk. Interacting in PMs is fine and dandy if you all are doing that but remember that it supplies the other members of the village less reason to village read you really for everything you say in PMs and not in thread. This is why I dislike PMs.
  8. - The tineye message says "regular spiked" and not "vanilla spiked" despite the village flips saying "vanilla" EDIT: Coral, what's your read on me rn?
  9. That along with the age old mistake of using "Regular" Instead of "Vanilla" But anyways, irrelevant. A quick look at D1 votes - I had a whole lot of motivation for this earlier in the day when I was on my phone... Bolded are people who are confirmed. Not bolded are my strongest reads, and blue are the people who I think are probably village. Italicized then are the most suspect based on process of Elimination, I suppose. Most of my positive read on Coral comes from our PM, where I bounced a readslist back and forth with them. I didn't play it right honestly, but nonetheless they still seemed to be hesitant about clearing people for certain things, and only did so once I did. That's what gives me most pause about them. At this point, I think I'm going to say that Meerkat and Coral are most likely the same alignment here, regardless of what that is. We flipped Mauve D1 and then Saffron the next, and I genuinely think we shouldn't be flipping Gorilla today. I do think Gorilla's vote here wasn't very good. Immediately more suspicious of everyone who is off the two main wagons. The Elims killing Scarlet though is just. Confusing to me. Supposedly weird kills like that make sense only in the situation where the Elims are losing, and kills don't really matter because they're going to die anyways. My other theory is that all the Tineyes are village. They're all village and the Elims figured out that Scarlet was one of them, and need to limit communication. If which that is the case, that would help narrow down possibilities for Elims potentially based on their views on PMing vs. Thread. If anyone has any questions on any of my reads or actions throughout the past days I'm more than happy to comply, though I believe i have been transparent in my thoughts throughout. Oxblood Beagle
  10. I have been playing like lassie all game and we all know how that worked for Shawn. I haven't thrown out a single bizarre theory yet. This needs to change, and soon.
  11. That works! If you are or know of the seeker, message @Salmon Meerkat and @Emerald Falcon. This is an Evil that MUST be stopped.
  12. Furthermore Meerkat supposedly hates wolfing, which furthers my thoughts about how he wouldn't be opposed to a gambit such as this
  13. Anyways, back to business Coral wolf equity rises here, regardless. They're not the seeker but they claim to have fooled meerkat in PMs. If so, why didn't he try to thunderdome? All he had to do was fake confusion for a minute, then claim this was an attempt to kill him without wasting a NK. The question then gets raised, why coral then? What danger was he in before? Which would potentially backfire back to Meerkat but the point still remains Giving up here doesn't reflect well on coral. I'm not taking anything Meerkat says at face value. Tired? I still believe him capable of looking. Why wouldn't coral just out a red check in thread? Because that's what you do. There's no point in interacting in PMs with a re-check (that you have rechecked, to see what they have to say) there's no role in this that would change the results of a check to spiked.
  14. Lol it is just openwolfing ok In which case ignore the fact that my explanation of me thinking he was evil looks like an Elim trying to get credit, and instead look at it like a Villager finally being right about Meerkat being evil :P.
  15. I for one have not had a strong trust on Meerkat. I don't know what's going on but by not refuting they're basically claiming it's right. Their overfixation on identities this game hasn't ever sat right with me, and specifically them seeming to trust me without actually ever trusting me. That among things I've mentioned throughout to some people. If this is some big phishing attempt or an attempt at killing Meerkat then perhaps I'll eat my words :P. No coinshot kill today?
  16. I don't have enough time to type out all my thoughts and for people to respond to them. I'll post them during the night (lot of good that'll do) but I don't have enough time, and the thought of it is making me mental. Either by tonight I'll trust myself more or I'll be hopefully able to figure out what went wrong. And there goes magenta trying to self pres onto someone who isn't Iguana.
  17. The point is that claiming does NOTHING to stop people voting on you. Claiming a vote manip only encourages more. I'm not going to talk in circles here but that's that.
  18. And suddenly Onyx moves into my village reads. Really guys, it's that easy. Just post. Unless I've made a mistake, these seem to be very interesting vote movements. Beagle, why go from voting on someone to suddenly voting beside them? I simultaneously feel best about the players on Onyx and that Onyx is Village. The other problem is i feel just as confident about the composition of the Iguana wagon. The Octopus wagon, who got suspicion for earlier in the cycle has the most questionable players on it, for me. Asterisks mark those who i have varying levels of trust on. >> Saffron Iguana(4): Pearl Chameleon*, Charcoal Hyena*, Onyx Flamingo*, Salmon Meerkat* > Onyx Flamingo*(3): Mint Heron*, Fuchsia Ostrich*, Coral Swan~ > Scarlet Octopus(3): Chartreuse Penguin*, Saffron Iguana, Oxblood Beagle Magenta Albatross(2): Amber Vulture*, Emerald Falcon****** Pearl Chameleon*(1): Violet Axolotl~ Turquiose Gorilla~ (1): Amethyst Scorpion Amethyst Scorpion (1): Turquoise Gorilla~ Purely by wagon composition I'd be voting iguana here. The other thing that bugs me is why would they claim? As either alignment? The problem is I read it more village because objectively a soother claim does nothing. It's not going to make people less suspicious of you, and it's at the very worst going to earn you even /more/ votes, just for the sake of votes. if you're village you save yourself, and if you're an Elim you save yourself and it's the same thing as the Elims saving you. And an Elim would know this, no? On the other hand, it could be seen as a last attempt to survive through a claim. but...why? When did they see themselves as damned? I don't get how they would have got that through the thread, and if they did, then why did they not have a stronger read on me for being one of them to push them? I might need to reread their post but if they're simply ignoring the pushes on them that's just more reason to vote them.
  19. I suppose we'll start here- First of all, I was a pretty prominent vote on Mauve, if I do say so myself. Not only that but the second person I have been pushing for the majority of Day 1 and today has been you. I'd think you'd have more to say on my other than "coinshot coinshot talkative" regardless of any backreading. Magenta, what was the goal of voting on me? >> Saffron Iguana(4): Pearl Chameleon, Charcoal Hyena, Oxblood Beagle, Onyx Flamingo > Onyx Flamingo(3): Mint Heron, Fuchsia Ostrich, Coral Swan > Magenta Albatross(3): Amber Vulture, Turquoise Gorilla, Emerald Falcon Pearl Chameleon(1): Violet Axolotl Scarlet Octopus(1): Chartreuse Penguin
×
×
  • Create New...