Jump to content

Arinian

Members
  • Posts

    711
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Arinian

  1. Well what I can say I know only that I'm villager. Don't have much time and health to say something else(it's 3 AM and my brain not very good working right now so I not gonna fool you cause you already was fooled ) . So I leave all to your decision ohh and also I again claiming "I told you".
  2. I don't think that you was too aggressive, even if so I can't blame you for that cause I didn't brought solid point to my gut read on you. Also sorry to everyone who asked me something but I don't have time to give answers I was really busy today and tomorrow promises to be not much easier. Really sorry about that, I know it's looks like very convinient reason to avoid answers and blah blah blah, but I can't do nothing about that. Oh also everyone can blame me in bandwagoning on Alv (it's not bandwagoning but.... mehh you can count this as bandwagoning ).
  3. I didn't wrote about Doc cause I don't suspect him, I have opinion on him but I always writing only whom I suspect, others(about whom I didn't wrote) is neutral for me. Not 55% village not 45% village just neutral I suspecting everyone till I don't get solid evidence to guess about their alignment. Now only whom I think is villager is Drake/ Oh, okay. Maybe I should quote all your votes in this game? Most of them based just on gut read and really weak points and now you blaiming that when I do so I'm elim. Or about that I didn't vote on this turn, maybe I should reminde you when you voted on me on cycle 3? You was first who said that I'm suspicious but voted on me after there was 3-4 votes on me. And about you leading in "right direction" almost all your post was absolutely neutral you or just voted based on your gut read or was talking about things that can't say much about your alignment so there not much things to say about you except your behavior was not same as when you villager as I see it. Only thing that was indicable for your alignment it's lynch on me so about your alignment can say my(but I know my alignment soo you can count that's as reason) or Quivers death. Oh like I'm only didn't vote, or I should again bring how you voted on me? So with your logic you elim too, Doc elim, Ecth elim... everyone is elim. Beautiful. And you didn't thought that I just not decided on whom I want to vote from this bunch? I was not sure on whom I want to vote on Alv or Ecth I thought between them, I still not sure whom I suspecting more. And also you asking me about reasons but you didn't bring any reasons just scratch. I'm elim cause I not voted, I elim cause I'm voted(remiding my vote on Alv for what I was lynched), I elim cause I not suspecting Doc, and I elim cause suspecting you. Ecth. Shqueeves. Drake. Oh and that very convinient thing, Quivers lynch was able to clean me little bit(if he elim) and now lynch delayed and on same turn you raising lynch on me, why not earlier not previous turn, why you was so reluctant with voting on me again if you so sure that I elim?
  4. Honestly on start of game I thought that Elsecaller can do that but then decided to myself that's this will be too overpowered so I didn't ask about that. Now I think that that's superoverpowered for elims even if Stonewarden is cheapest spren and Elsecaller is most expensive still it's overpower(If elims can kill swapped person with only one elim, can they?). That just my opinion on that. So what I think... we in damnation bad situation. Why? Cause Inactivity Reigns. If we won't imprison inactive player on that turn(or some of inactives will come back) turn or two later we will be unable to execute or pardon. So what we will do? Imprison inactive so maybe we still will have enough votes to excute\pardon or we will test our luck(imprison someone whom we suspecting?). I hate Lift, so no I'm not dissapointed. There can be many reasons(Quiver is villager and they just want to confuse us, or he is just elim and they just get one more pair of hands for kills, or all that thing is crazy WGG and Joe is elim or... I don't know something else). But I don't see any reason why Elsecaller is not elim, what reason for villager to save inactive player keeping village without information and making from active player easy target(only 1 elim to kill so they without problem can kill Drake and Joe in one turn). So I almost sure that Elsecaller is elim(or DA is Elsecaller). Why no vote from you on previous turn? I'm really geniunly interested, you was active, so what? It's looks like really convinient thing for elims active player who gains honor for RP. And you so CERTAIN about their goal, cause you looks CERTAIN? Or you just wants to point us on this idea? So whom I suspecting: 1)Alv. That's was interesting trick (fits for Alv? I don't know, I think yes) with Elsecaller(maybe that just I'm too stupid that didn't thought about this trick), also he saying that he not sure that Elsecaller elim(but I don't see reasons why village Elsecaller would do that(only if he get prophecy from Preservation that Quiver will save us all)). Also now I think that elims all that time was investigating(okay it's obvious that they investigated) players till turn 5(so they will have list from which they can choose whom they want to see dead), I think that's clever move from them(I think fits for Alv). 2)Lopen. Mostly gut read. Also he was one who knew that Rae is Lighweaver. Lopen's post if someone missed: 3)Jondesu. This suspicion based on his votes on previous cycle, also there was many people suspicious of him when bandwagon on me formed so that can be that I was distraction not from Quiver but from him.(If it was so as you can see this worked and now there not many people suspicious of him.) Also if Shqueeves is unjust then it's will increase my suspicion on him, now my suspicion on him not solid enough. 4)Randuir. Bad gut read, not much more to say. But if Shqueeves is elim I think it increases chances that he is too. 5)Ecth. I was not suspicious of him till now but he not voted on previous turn but there was RP from him(also I'm paranoind of WGG . And as Joe said me not long ago "You should be very paranoid when I'm near, not little bit.(Also Alv said me almost same thing in start of this game, coincidence ?)) Still there stays question if we should imprison inactive so we won't lose our ability to execute or we discussing whom we suspect(as it should be normally) and then decide who of active players is suspicious enough and imprisoning him. Hope I'm understandable *shrug*
  5. I don't know but wording says this:
  6. To pardon 2 people in one cycle we need 150% of players. So I think now you know answer on that.
  7. I just looked through thread again and what I've seen. Just want to point that Jon voted on Drake twice, I don't count that as evidence for something I even can say that usually elims more careful with their posts. But that just my opinion. My point for vote on Shqueeves was that he is lurking not cause he is inactive. And his (Shqueeves's) post was not very substuntial, he just jumped in thread and said "Hey guys I'm here I have nothing to say but don't lynch me" of course that not means that he is elim but that's also don't make him active player he is still lurker who just don't want to be lynched for inactivity(low activity). Okay that's understandable why he didn't put vote cause probably he didn't read through thread. Hmm... maybe I missed Shqueeves vote somewhere? Cause you changed your vote. You not played with DA before? Cause voting on him for his usual behavior it's mehh... he can be elim and he can be villager his behavior means nothing. I don't think that HH familiar with DA's usual behavior so I even don't know why I quoted him *shrug* And back to randuir. You changed your vote but above you said "for pretty much the same reasons as arinian" and "I'll (re)move my vote once he's actually voted on the pardon/execution of drake" as I see my reasons was not even close same as yours. And that really safe vote change from Shqueeves on DA and than on JUQ makes me suspicious. You jumped on DA's bandwagon for his short posts as I understand? But after you was pointed that it's usual for him you used JUQ's inactivity so Shqueeves was left behind without yours vote on him. I'm not accusing you, I have not enough evidence to make my logic chain solid but that's suspicious. Also same about Jon I can see this fast change from Shqueeves on (easy target) DA as a good chance to save teammate. So I returning my vote on Shqueeves I want to lynch him just for information.
  8. Guys sorry but voting for DA is waste, he always doing not most clever things (I think he just getting fun from that). If someone don't believe me you can look on DA in MR20 or check LG28 his behavior don't mean that he is elim. What I think that someone pulling votes from Shqueeves cause by random we hit in elim and I think this one who pulling votes it's Jondesu (don't know whom better to lynch to prove my idea hmm... Jon or Shqueeves hmm.) Drake. Quiver.
  9. Even don't look on DA it's his usual erratic behavior.
  10. I don't think that we can get 14 votes to pardon him in so short time. Sorry Drake, you just was unlucky. I will put my vote on Shqueeves(yes again). I really don't know on whom to vote. Probably I want to see Alv in prison(only for reason if Drake will be revealed as villager) but I doubt that Alv will collect more votes on him till the end of cycle(and there vote manipulator who trusts in Alv) so Shqueeves. As I said I doubt that Drake will get enough votes(14) to pardon him(on previous cycle we even didn't get enough votes to execute Quiver) so I will keep my vote on his execution. I will try to look through thread before rollover(but I'm not sure) and maybe will change my vote.
  11. All what I can advice for now is we keep Drake in prison but Stoneward or Elsecaller protects him. So I changing my vote on Quiver maybe we really will get something from that. And voting for Alv's imprisoning. Why? Cause right now I'm sure there was 2 attacks on Rae Drake's attack was blocked by Windrunner that what I think, but elims wasting 2 attacks on Rae only cause she said that she was going for Edgedancer... mehh... I don't believe in that. Probably I shouldn't vote on Alv cause if Quiver is elim then Alv probably not, but gut read says that I should vote for Alv. Maybe I will rethink all this later but now that it so. Ninjad by randuir .
  12. If Windrunner blocks kill it also will be mentioned in write up?
  13. Now I'm confused. Why Rae was burning in write up? She was saved? But if she was saved why that not mentioned in write up. First my thought was that Aman failed with information that he put in write up and two kills(Dustbringer's attempt and Unjust's kill) was one kill so he just described it as two. Now I think that there was two kills, but why(I don't believe in such coincidences)? And how Rae avoided first attempt on her life? All what I can guess that: someone whom she said that she was going for cultivationspren was elim and he just decided to go for sure kill on her.(I mean double tap) And I don't think that Doc is elim, revealing all that so obviously mehh it's not what I see as elim behavior also I have village read on him. But it looks like not very experienced move(or they just want us to think so)... hmm. I will vote for Shqueeves he is new player and I've seen him looking through thread many times but saying nothing (maybe I bit biased cause I don't like lurkers, sorry if something), also this all mixed with bad gut read. Probably I will change my vote later if my head will give me other thought. Aman are protects also should be mentioned in write up?
  14. There was part where Rae burning: So I think that Dustbringer attack on Rae existed, but you probably right maybe Drake not Dustbringer and just tried to save himself by using this part of write up.
  15. Khm... What a lawful spren. Read write up about Lomot's death this one almost identical. I see there 3 posibilities: 1) Aman is lying to us. I doubt in it so we going to other. 2) Drake attacked Rae on same turn when elims decided that it's good idea to kill Rae, I don't know what elims thought when they decided kill someone so suspicious *shrug* That's possible but chance of it not very big, so Drake is unlucky if he is villager. 3) As I said to you in PM he is just unjust Dutbringer who was very unlucky. Also question to Aman. Dustbringer's kill goes before or after lynch?
  16. Aman just wrote me that someone bonded cultivation spren. So Windrunner keep your eyes on Drake.
  17. Khm... sorry but I can't be in Bridge group cause I'm fugitive. Drake.
  18. Hey! Dustbringer don't do it! On what I will waste my time? I already dead in all other games that going now. Or hmm... Elsecaller swap me with Mage so he will be killed by Dustbringer
  19. I don't think that we will get much from quiver's lynch honestly. But lets hope that I'm wrong
  20. So you mean bond that formed on this cycle is Dustbringer? So my spren still free wohoo!
  21. I meant trust not in this game but trust to person at all. If you want I can delete you from list of people whom I can trust and put you on list of people whom I will kill when I get kill role... I think there still some place between Lopen and Alv, it suits you?(Joe don't worry, you on the first place whom I will kill when I will get kill ability(joke)) RP:short and horrible RP
×
×
  • Create New...