Droughtbringer

Who needs compounding? Just get a few Bendalloy people together, and have them burn while you store. Bonus points if they are all twinborn and can store at the same time.

Sign up as Druoght, then.

But what if I'm the best elim?

Sign me up as Lopen

@Herowannabe made this awesome thing: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1407306

This was a great game, thank you @A Joe in the Bush for running it. I wish that I had been able to play longer, as I never really got the chance to protect anyone, but I still had a blast. Thank you, everyone!

This is all of Ornsteins posts, in this game. They lack substance, and I don't see much of a reason to lynch him. That being said, we don't want to lynch Alv, or me, because we have been (maybe, probably) scanned. 1. Roadwalker as Silver Feather 2. Steeldancer as Steel 3. Devotary of Spontaneity as Erdon 4. Ornstein as Pizanca 5. Alvron as Ra 6. Droughtbringer as themself 7. Arinian as Apophis 8. livinglegend as Kharaght I'm coloring this based off of my reads. 3, 5, 6, are my Very Village Reads. 2, 7, are my Slight Village Reads. That leaves 1, 4, and 8 as my maybe elims. I don't have any real evidence as to them being elims, except for the fact that they are not giving me village vibes when almost everyone else is. Since the lynch appears to already be going towards Ornstein I will join in with that.

Please don't do this, if we make too many mistakes here then we end up losing the game. If you have a good reason to lynch me, then say it. Convince people, don't just toss your vote around please. All that this is accomplishing is a bit of a joke for you, and not actually helping us win the game, it is generating discussion on things that have already been addressed in two posts above. Could you give examples of this?

Why? As I said we can not just vote based off of gut at this point, and you need to list your evidence. So if you are placing a vote, then please give us a reason why. Umh... Me. See above.

I highly doubt that. Alv just enjoys destroying darkness. He hasn't actually pushed the lynch outside of voting on Apophis, instead of voting on Arinian. Generally, when Alv votes, he will vote on the Player, not the character. (I think, too lazy to go actually double check this :P) No one has died which is interesting, that means either our elims are going inactive, or are trying to hide somehow. If they don't attack it prevents us from scanning to clear players. They might try to start controlling the lynch, so we need to be warry of Bandwagons that don't have too much reason. Remaining players: 1. Roadwalker as Silver Feather 2. Steeldancer as Steel 3. Devotary of Spontaneity as Erdon 4. Ornstein as Pizanca 5. Alvron as Ra 6. Droughtbringer as themself 7. Arinian as Apophis 8. livinglegend as Kharaght Eight players is not a lot, and our activity has been down a lot recently. I will try to start generating more discussion, now. @Ornstein hasn't posted since last Thursday, and we would really like to have you come back, so please come talk with us more The rules: This means that we need to have a successful lynch either today or tomorrow. If we don't then we will end up losing. I would suggest that everyone looks back through the past cycles and tries to find someone to vote on within the next 9 hours, with their reasoning for doing so. This will give us 24 hours to discuss why we suspect each person, and hopefully decide who to lynch. During lynching for the rest of the game please don't just vote on someone to clear yourself, only vote if you have evidence, and give us that evidence.

So apparently nothing is happening anymore... I have no ideas. Will read the thread.

Fair enough. But since when are you the Light?

Again...?

No, seriously, look back at the cycle. I seriously said Then I didn't come back at any point in the cycle to see anything. Sorry

Just for reference: I had no idea what was going on back then I am actually paying more attention to what is going on in this game, I was distracted by LG41, but now I am dead So more of my attention will be here. The vote on budgie, there, was actually just to tie everything up, because ties are fun. Then I didn't look at the rest of the cycle and didn't see that Budgie was actually about to be lynched. Sorry.

Why are we voting on Apophis?

Fair enough. Against my better judgment, Darkness. HH

Is that worth the risk, though?

To allow myself to not die, I will be moving my vote to Darkness. HH.

I'm smart Sorry LL. Yeah, the IKYK is not a fun thing to have to deal with. It stands for I know you know for the new players. (it is kinda like this scene in the Princess Bride) But my point still stands that they probably didn't participate in the lynch as much as we are all thinking that they are, so. probably sometime tonight (if I'm not dead) will take a look at who all has been active but didn't vote (if there is anyone) to see who all is there. I just feel like the elims would not have done much to stop the vote. Maybe they wouldn't have done much to help it, though. And yes, let us look for the Unstable Mistborn, because I quite like winning. If you are the elims you are also going to want to help us look for them because they are trying to kill us as much as we are, only they have a constant night kill that they can use.

Rand was a thief. /Sarcasm: Big Surprise. I honestly haven't been paying that much attention to the game, so I don't know where to go from here. I'll be checking past days/nights to see what is going on. If someone here actually knows something feel free to bring it up.

You think that everyone who has voted against Drake is evil? Also, could you explain why you are voting for Darkness? You're explanations, don't seem to be that much. Bad Gut Read: This one is fair. Your Defensiveness: Of course I am defensive. I want to stay alive and help however I can. This means that I need to defend myself. As well as the fact that I... (see next point) Asterion Lynch: Asterion had seen the thread. Asterion knew, at least to some degree, what was going on. For me, this means that someone is actively watching the thread, but not actively playing. This seems more suspicious to me, because it implies that someone is using a doc, and looking at the thread and posting directly into the doc rather than saying anything in the thread. If someone is just inactive they aren't doing that. I don't think that we should have lynched Ornstein, still. He was inactive which meant that, at the time, was only helping the eliminators by existing, but not contributing to discussion. I am still happy that we found an elim, but it seems to me that lynching inactives tends to not be as helpful. That being said we did gain some information out of this, namely: The Asterion lynch, and the people who vote on Asterion to try and save Ornstein. This would be Sart, Araris, Drake, Droughtbringer, and Devotary (Yes, me in the third person(I just copied and pasted from N1 and I am too lazy to press backspace)). The biggest problem with assuming that the eliminators would try and save Ornstien is that he is constantly innactive. A direct quote from him, and MR22 is: He tends to be an inactive, and saving him doesn't do much to help the elims, except for the fact that there is possibly a false trail that is being laid behind him. Lynching Ornstein is possibly a way to distance yourself from him, and the fact that he is an elim. Sure, this is just me defending myself, but it still is a decent point, so I will be, personally, looking closer at: Seonid, Straw, Steel, HH, L.Legend. @Seonid has been fairly useful for the town, but has (recently) began to focus a lot on the Mistborn. This could be a good strategy for the village, or it could not. Depending on... @A Joe in the Bush If all of the Elims die does the game end and the Unstable Mistborn win? Or does the game continue until something else? If the game does end then we really need to focus on the UM, but if it doesn't end then we should probably focus elims, form a pact with the UM, then kill the UM afterwards. Depending on the results of this questions, and Seonids reaction to it will change my read of him. So Neutral read for now. @Straw recently has "Voted to solidify the lynch" but that is about it. He hasn't done much but has appeared to be active by pinging inactives and voting on people. Slight Elim read. @Steeldancer You've contributed a lot to the village, providing discussion, and attempting to lynch me The lynching me actually makes me think of you more as town, because you have brought up half decent reasons and seem to genuinly want to lynch someone. That being said... *dramatic pause* Slight Village read. @Hemalurgic Headshot Pushed for lynching Ornstein. Then claimed to not be the Unstable Mistborn, saying that the UM knew who that he wasn't the UM which is weird reasoning. He also is pushing for a lynch on Drake (I think), saying that we don't have to keep him alive, even though he has been contributing to discussion, specifically discussion on the UM. This gives me a slight Mistborn read. @livinglegend has posted only 2 times in this game, and doesn't give me any reads one way or another. So not even a neutral read, just No Read. For fear of losing the game due to killing of all of the elims, I will be putting my vote on HH Instead of Straw. Also, Drake.

Could you guys explain specifically what you we have done to arrouse your suspicions? Also, Steeldancer, is there a reason that you are practically copying everything that Drake says? Drake put his vote onto Aarasis, and in the next post you did the same. After that he said he didn't trust us and then you did the same. I may be reading into this too much, but why are you just following practically everything that he says? You haven't done it so much the past bit, but at the start of the cycle is happened.

This feels largely like you are trying to distract people from something. But I don't know what that is. You did not say why you are putting your vote on Sart, put a challenge that doesn't seem to benefit the Village except for killing Araris or me, and I generally get a very weird feeling from this post. So: Drake Marshal

Rand. I want to see your response, and we need to make sure we keep pressure on you.