Jump to content

Amanuensis

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5932

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Amanuensis

  1. Amanuensis
    I think you missed a few posts, Gamma this was discussed not long ago. Elephant was the second vote on Roadwalker, and Elephant also said he'd make a concerted effort with his two accounts to reveal his identity if he was in danger
  2. Amanuensis
    Lmao Fura. This is what I was just typing (4) reklawdaoR: Elandera, Sapphire Elephant, ITIAH, Metabardnition, (1) High Priest of Lord Tekiel: Furamirionind, (1) Elandera: Aranduensis, (1) A Joe In The Bush: Jondesu, (1) Gammalv Fiend: Araris Valerian, (1) ITIAH: Cadmium Compounder, (1) NotASteelClone: Seventh Saint, (1) Aranduensis: Mailliw773, (1) Guest103492: HPoLT,
  3. Amanuensis
    Thank you for the effort, Elandera. It is much appreciated. Despite viewing the thread earlier, @reklawdaoR still hasn't posted. After this last ping I think I'll give up on trying to get their attention. ITIAH doesn't seem like a bad alternative for the reason CadCom voted for him, which I'll go ahead and quote below. (3) reklawdaoR: Elandera, Sapphire Elephant, ITIAH, (2) High Priest of Lord Tekiel: Mailliw772, NotASteelClone, (1) Elandera: Aranduensis, (1) A Joe In The Bush: Jondesu, (1) Gammalv Fiend: Araris Valerian, (1) ITIAH: Cadmium Compounder, (1) Mailliw772: Metabardnition, (1?) Metabardnition: Seventh Saint,
  4. Amanuensis
    Hmmm. Let me take a look at Maill. I'm not sure if it's particularly off, per say, but I would honestly like more serious content from everyone. @Mailliw772, as the "next vessel in line for the Storm" that "sees all," what can you tell me? Oh... very well then.
  5. Amanuensis
    I'm going to vote on Elandera to make things a little bit more interesting / add some pressure. @Elandera, what are your thoughts on my last post regarding you and on Aranduensis' own vote? With that done, here are the current votes, by my estimate: (3) reklawdaoR: Elandera, Sapphire Elephant, ITIAH, (2) Elandera: Aranduensis, Adavantos, (1) High Priest of Lord Tekiel: Mailliw772, (1) A Joe In The Bush: Jondesu, (1) Gammalv Fiend: Araris Valerian, (1) ITIAH: Cadmium Compounder, (1?) Metabardnition: Seventh Saint, @Jondesu, to clarify... is your intention to vote for the GM, who's name is A Joe In the Bush, or for the player, who's name was previously @A Joe In The Bush but is now May I suggest The Only Joe? @Mailliw772 and @Araris Valerian can you tell us a little bit more about your reasoning for voting for these players? Also... I'm not really sure if Seventh Saint putting "retract" in green was good enough to take his vote off of Meta, so I have it with a question mark here. Would hate to see someone get lynched by accident. Especially my dear friend Meta! EDIT: Oh yeah. I should put the caveat that if @reklawdaoR doesn't post today, I'll probably change my vote to them. Whatever apprehensions I have about Elan are nowhere near damning enough to be a priority over an inactive.
  6. Amanuensis
    I'm like 99% sure that Sapphire Elephant (and other anon accounts, if they come to exist) cannot be targeted by abilities. In particular, I would expect the anon account definitely can't be converted, since that wouldn't change the alignment of the player with the Multi-Boxer role, who's controlling it. So as long as their identity remains a secret this shouldn't be a concern.
  7. Amanuensis
    I'm pretty okay with voting for reklawdaoR, for the record, but the middle portion of this post is pretty flawed. Just in case I was wrong, I quickly skimmed through the whole day again and haven't seen "Aranduensis" do a single thing remotely trolly. Pretty much every one of his posts have been role analysis / clarifications. While I very clearly have been taking this game lightly, however, that can be explained pretty easily by the fact that it was the first 24 hours of the game. I also find it interesting that you didn't mention Steel, who I think has the most problematic metaplay in the game. On the first page I pointed out the flaw (he says never trust his clone, and it's impossible to determine which is the clone, therefore Steel can never be trusted). Sooo, yeah. @High Priest of Lord Tekiel, if you were to return your vote to Elan, I would legitimately consider joining you Elan's response seems way too easy for my liking, as if he just latched onto a pair of names that have been mentioned relatively frequently and justified it with half-formed thoughts. Villagers do this kind of thing all the time - especially early game - but so do people trying to look like villagers, since they lack any other direction + motivation to actually find the evils. I'm pretty cool with killing inactives like @reklawdaoR, though. I always prefer them over people contributing, even minimally. Furamirionind. I believe you missed a vote or two, but I need to get ready for Uni right now, thus I'll look over it later.
  8. Amanuensis
    [insert obligatory "Why not both?" gif] In this games case, Eliminator = Villager. So I didn't claim Elim, I claimed Village. That's why it was a joke I think I was very helpful in pointing out the Elephant thing. Gammalv just managed to steal my thunder also I'm sure my antics have been entertaining for a few people, at least. What's the harm in having fun? I'm not impersonating anyone, for the record. I am definitely the original Adavantos.
  9. Amanuensis
    Ah ok. In that case, all is forgiven. I'm not sure typing retract in green is enough to take your votes down, however. You may need to repeat all three of our names On the subject, however. High Priest of Lord Tekiel. It seems the cookie you gave me has granted me allomantic power, so I've decided to forgive you. Which brings me to a dilemma. Who do I vote for now? EDIT: Oh right! Furamirionind! All is fair in love and war. And besides, you never answered my question.
  10. Amanuensis
    I feel attacked under what pretense am I a spambot? Explain yourself! TY Joe <3
  11. Amanuensis
    Hm. If someone were to have a statement like that in their signature, I reckon they must be the incarnation of darkness and evil themselves. I wonder what such a malicious manifestation is up to, now. Sparks! My cover is blown. Unless... Burn you, Gammalv! You caught me! Now everyone will realize I'm Aman's #1 Fan / President of his Harem Fan Club. You hear that, senpai? Pls notice me.
  12. Amanuensis
    I think Aman is probably right, Fura. I dare say that Aman is always right and should be trusted by all players in every game. Totally-not-biased opinion aside, in this case the rules support his read of things over yours, I think. From the initial post: Key word being all in "all the abilities of the Spammers". The statement above is not only followed by a list of Spammer roles, but in the Player list doc you just mentioned... Please note that the role's name is in green. Sapphire Elephant is basically a confirmed villager role with a degree of protection, in that he probably can't die unless the player with the Multi-Boxer role is killed themselves. EDIT UGH! Couldn't you guys have let me finish my post first >> EDIT DEUGH: Also how do you keep confusing me with Aman, @Furamirionind? We're nothing alike...
  13. Amanuensis
    To be fair, I don't really think Gammalv or ITIAH has said or done anything particularly trolly (though I'm still upset about those RoW Spoilers ). But if you're using trolliness as a qualifier for eliminatorness, then I'll happily accept the label for myself. Also, Steel. While I doubt I'll ever be able to parse whether or not it's you or your clone talking, and subsequently never be able to develop trust towards you in general, I have a more critical lead. HIGH PRIEST OF LORD TEKIEL! I demand you answer for the crime of baking a sharp metal object into this cookie you gifted me! @High Priest of Lord Tekiel Hello Meta! Long time no see! Honestly a bit surprised you haven't PM'd me already. I do qualify as one of your old buddies, don't I? Don't I...? ...please.
  14. Amanuensis
    But how can I know that you're not the clone?
  15. Amanuensis
    Hmm... okay. I'm convinced. Steel.
  16. Amanuensis
    As is tradition, I'm going to openly claim eliminator and see how long I can survive the game. Spoilers!!!!!!!!!
  17. Amanuensis
    I have considered your proposal, and decided not to sign the form. I might have been gone for over three years but I don't need a tutorial on how to SE. Thank you kindly for the cookie, however Thank you, Wilson! I'm glad the justified text is what you remember me for, of all things.
  18. Amanuensis
    Hey everyone! Most of you probably don't remember me. The last game I played was LG17 back in January of 2016, which is practically a lifetime ago! Wow. But anyway, I happened to be perusing the forums after a much-too-long hiatus and decided it was about time for my return debut. And what better way to begin than by helping save our forums from these spammers? I can't think of many, sooo.... Count me in
  19. Amanuensis
    Thanks, Kidpen! Fifth! I didn't know we shared our Birthday! Happy Birthday!
  20. Amanuensis
    We're always happy to welcome new players to our community! I'm sure I'm speaking for us all when I say we're looking forward to getting to kill know you.
  21. Amanuensis
    I'm very excited to play my first anonymous game, and I'm very thankful it gets to be this one. Can't wait to see how things turn out. Count me in!
  22. Amanuensis
    Huh. Did you know there's a DrakeMarshall running around here somewhere, too? What're the odds.
  23. Amanuensis
    I'm at the point where I'm very worried that we're gonna reach end game before we know it. The village really can't afford inactivity deaths. 3 to 8 now, but if @STINK, @Nohadon, @Coop772, @Lumgol and @Gancho Libre are mostly village and die, we're toast.
  24. Amanuensis
    N1 Convert, D2 Lynch, N2 Convert, N3 Convert, D4 Lynch, right? That's 4 beads, 3 conversions. I'm a little concerned about the Seeker being compromised tbh.
  25. Amanuensis
    At most, the game is what, 2 to 9 right now?
×
×
  • Create New...