Jump to content

Clanky

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1090

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Clanky

  1. Clanky
    Naturally It does. Lopen what cycles did Ada say his scans were from? Also I see that we decided against killing Shallan with the mission. I suppose I understand that.
  2. Clanky
    "I've got it this time guys! I've definitely got it!" "What now Klin..." "Grass! It's grass!" "Huh?" "The missing ingredient in my eternal youth potion! Every winter it looks like it's all withered and brown but it isn't actually dead, it always revives in the spring. It must be what I've been missing!" " 'Sigh' Why are you even still working on this Klin?" "Well isn't it obvious? I want to be Forever Young." "Do you really want to live forever? Forever and ever?" "It's so hard to get old without a cause, I don't want to perish like a fading horse. Youth's like diamonds in the sun and diamonds are forever" "What?..... You're so weird Klin. Why do I hang out with you." ----- So I don't really have any thoughts yet. Just want to remind people that even if your vote doesn't get someone put on the horns doesn't mean that nothing happens to them. Tuition still increases from having complaints filed against you. Also isn't there supposed to be 48 hours in each cycle? The countdown timer has it ending 36 hours after this thread opened?
  3. Clanky
    I personally do, I believe Shallan is the only one who is completely inactive though. Anyone else have thoughts on this? Use the mission to kill Shallan?
  4. Clanky
    Don't we want to use the mission to get rid of an inactive?
  5. Clanky
    Hey! I had already died once no need to try and get me killed again!
  6. Clanky
    Well I didn't quite expect that. Good game everyone and thanks for GMing Ada. Mostly way to go PK, every one of your attempted attacks were at traitors?! So what does a Masters Apprentice get to do Kipper?
  7. Clanky
    When someone is healed once from a fatal wound they are upgraded to just wounded. A wounded player who receives a second fatal wound dies. However if a wounded player is healed again then they go back to healthy and are back to normal. Sart went directly from Fatal Wound to fully healed meaning he had to have been targeted twice by a acolyte that cycle. The problem with Jerle and PK both being traitors is that it would only clear them as long as nobody ever scans their role and finds out they are not a Shadowbinder. Also given that there was a shadowbinder who killed STINK that would mean that either there is another loyal shadowbinder who actually killed STINK and knows they both are lying, they killed a member of their own team on purpose or a skinchanger changed the target of their kill to STINK but nobody has claimed to have any part in doing that so I doubt it.
  8. Clanky
    Maill told him that there was another claim in thread. I assume he then PMd maill to get the name since I don't see Maill actually saying who it was but PK does find out. The reason I voted for PK was that I am more suspicious of him then Jerle, and if he is 24 hours from when he said he would be inactive then he should be back before the cycle is over to defend himself. However the more I think about this the more confused I get as to why two people would claim the kill? Option 1: One of them is a traitor who decided they would be more trusted if somebody thought they killed STINK. Unlikely unless they are a shadowbinder as well in case someone stewarded them. Option 2: Both are loyal shadowbinders who just happened to decide on killing STINK at the same time. Looking more and more correct to me. Option 3: Both traitors who decided to go literally insane. Idunno, can anyone think why this would be make sense? Paranoid King. I will however move my vote on to Jerle for now. Your thoughts on the matter would be very much appreciated beyond one sentence.
  9. Clanky
    Thanks again for that, I didn't know if you wanted me to reveal to the thread so I didn't. I'm also suspicious of Paranoid King. To use his power he needs to be part of a successful lynch. That does explain his strange voting patterns somewhat but why didn't he put a vote on Alvron last cycle? Assuming both he and Alv are traitors he only voted for Alv when he knew Alv would survive. Then next cycle I am killed when I was pushing very hard for Alvs death. Perhaps they were hoping that they could push the lynch to someone else and give Alv time to heal himself? Also here he questions Maills use of a stoneman kill to justify Strawmans lynch and then later after it is revealed that STINK was a traitor stoneman he used his previous statement to cast suspicion in mailliw. That's a good way to use the death of a fellow eliminator if he had known STINK was bad all along. Then there is this thing with Jerle claiming Shadowbinder as well and I would like to hear from Jerle about. EDIT: Colour
  10. Clanky
    Yep, Sanderson Admitting. Everybody just goes in a circle talking about all the horrible things they've done to people in Sanderson Elimination. It's a great time.
  11. Clanky
    Hello everyone! I'm back! Thanks Priest! I don't like how the all discussion just dropped off completely last cycle and you all let it happen. Three votes isn't enough for anything good to happen. Alvron. Sure Maill may have been buildered it is a reasonable thing to happen. Actually I'll bet he was buildered anyways ensuring that he wouldn't be saved and you probably even did target him just in case you were followed again. As for you not knowing what caused it, I really doubt that. It's either a builder or a skinchanger depending on which one the traitors have. You also never responded to anything in my original post voting for you so I wouldn't mind some response. EDIT: Dammit I completely misread how that lynch went. using the character names really confuses me. Anyways be bck with another vote soon. EDIT 2: So now that we've got our first dead Greenseer I think we should ask questions here in the thread so that Maill can respond from the dead doc through his PM. The best way to take advantage of this would be using yes or no answers i order so that he can just respond with Y or N. Anyone think of anything we need to know from the dead doc? 1) Maill is there another Greenseer?
  12. Clanky
    LUNA, You were right about Ada, Lopen. Basically Ada has constantly been suspicious of LUNA yet never placed a vote at all.
  13. Clanky
    So PK claimed to be the Shadowbinder and we have another Shadowbinder claim? Did both STINK and the other shadowbinder claim to have killed STINK? I doubt that the traitors would have a shadowbinder and a Stoneman. Unless they only have 3 players and there is no faceless man maybe?
  14. Clanky
    I didn't think about multiple roles. But it does say "Roles and alignment will not be revealed immediately upon death" in the OP so I guess it is possible
  15. Clanky
    Isn't Giant-blooded the only thing that survives the lynch?
  16. Clanky
    If what Sart says is true there are at least two other acolytes out there who could heal you. Since we now know your role I'm not sure what exactly you need to be alive for another two cycles more for. Besides even if you die you can still communicate with us through a greenseer. It seems like people are going to let Alv take the test for you since he isn't the top lynch candidate at the moment anyways. Even if Alv does heal you I'm not sure that I would completely trust him. after all the traitors would have had no need of an acolyte last cycle so what better person to have make a kill on a person in need of healing than an acolyte themselves just in case they are followed and asked to prove themselves.
  17. Clanky
    Vote Tally: Alvron(2): Sart, Clanky DeathClutch(3): Mailliw, Jerle, PK Jerle(2): Lopen, Deathclutch So the vote tally lines up with deathclutch being the one getting lynched so far with these reasonings: So in other words not much reasoning. Nobody had more than one sentence as to why they are suspicious of him. So personally I think that those are horrible reasons but who am I to judge. PK, if you want someones death that will give a bunch of info why not pick Alvron? At least people have posted more than a sentence about him. Also there have been multiple role claims that would be useful to know and some real discussion about it. I don't know but if info is all that you want I'm not sure why you picked Deathclutch.
  18. Clanky
    Well you could be the one making the kill because you have the least useful role or people with less important roles roles were inactive. Also this is probably the main reason for it being strawman who was killed exactly so that you would have an excuse in case you were caught. I'm thinking that now knowing that STINK was a stoneman the eliminators decided that they would first infect whomever they killed so that they can have a convenient excuse should they get caught visiting that player. To be fair that only would have worked a few times until people would suspect and begin protecting the infected players, which then also helps the traitors by drawing protection towards the infected players allowing them to target other players with ease. Alvron. Another point that isn't in your favour was bringing up using a red priest on STINK or Kyn, by putting it into an edit you make it seem like an afterthought so that it would be less suspicious of you if STINK wasn't revived and was a revealed traitor. Also Sart, I wouldn't be so quick to clear Kipper when STINK only voted on him to tie the lynch and didn't want to actually be the deciding vote. Also now that strawman is dead for anyone that didn't get his code yet it said "I am a steward" using the first and last letter of each line.
  19. Clanky
    Deathclutch, I'm going to move my vote to Lopen. As I believe Sart posted earlier he has been active but really flying under the Radar, most of his posts have been about who is in line for a fatal wound from inactivity. Sure that's good stuff to know I guess but it doesn't really help much just to point it out. If a player is paying attention to the game to notice you put their name on a post they will probably realize they are in-line for inactivity death anyways. His only post that wasn't about that is just basically a rehashing, plus a few more thoughts, of what each role should do which is one of the things strawman was in trouble for. Plus he hasn't voted yet and the second cycle is almost done. Also now that Strawman isn't really up for a lynch it would be nice if we could get an acolyte on healing him.
  20. Clanky
    Personally I think that the red priest should wait to use their power until someone more confirmed than "usually people killed on C1 aren't eliminators" is killed or someone who we know has a valuable role. Did any of the dead players claim a role to anyone here? Also I think Mark is definitely not the most safe to bring back. You are 100% basing that off the fact that C1 lynches have a poor success rate. However they aren't always wrong. If I had to choose someone to bring back this cycle it would be Kyn because he was killed by the traitors and I doubt that they would kill one of their own so early even if they have a Red priest. I still don't recommend it at all though. Anyone revived this early would seem very suspicious to me with the lack of data we've got.
  21. Clanky
    Has STINK changed his mind about going on missions? If he hasn't then I am also fine with going for some more missiony stuff.
  22. Clanky
    If sart doesn't come on and post this cycle he dies even if he is healed. Healing him once brings him to Wounded, then he will get another fatal wound from not posting again ending up with him dead anyways. If he does return before the end of the cycle and start contributing then I am all for him being healed.
  23. Clanky
    Basically wha I see about strawman is a new player who is enthusiastic about his first game and likes to be involved. I realize that people don't really like being told what to do but I don't think it's meant to be forcing people to do things it's just suggestions and basically everyone does stuff like that. I just don't think we should be lynching anyone whose only crime is enthusiasm this early into their first game. I'm going to put a vote on Deathclutch. His vote seems like a traitor trying to seal an early lynch without much discussion. Also his first meaningful post of the game is a vote for a player without any reasoning. EDIT: Vote Colour
  24. Clanky
    What exactly do you propose the code is used for? It isn't really much of a code if everyone has the key to it.
  25. Clanky
    Wait... Now you're good? Do you even really know what your own name is?
×
×
  • Create New...