Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Jezrien.

 

4 hours ago, #1_Taln_Fan said:

Taravangian

 

4 hours ago, Shinwarrior said:

Gavilar

 

4 hours ago, AceBassMan said:

Raoden?

No to all!

1: This person is royalty

2: This person is knowledgeable

3: This character is Invested

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Kingsdaughter613 said:

Nope!

1: This person is royalty

2: This person is knowledgeable

3: This character is Invested

4: This character’s name* is only given once.

Bajerden.

Edit: Cancel that, something else came to mind. VaraTreledees.

Edited by ElMonoEstupendo
Posted
4 hours ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Bajerden.

Edit: Cancel that, something else came to mind. VaraTreledees.

No to both of those. But close!

1: This person is royalty

2: This person is knowledgeable

3: This character is Invested

4: This character’s name* is only given once.

5: This person’s name* is also the title of the book they initially appear in, and this character is the first POV in that book.

 
Posted
2 minutes ago, Kingsdaughter613 said:

No to both of those. But close!

1: This person is royalty

2: This person is knowledgeable

3: This character is Invested

4: This character’s name* is only given once.

5: This person’s name* is also the title of the book they initially appear in, and this character is the first POV in that book.

 

Warbreaker the Peaceful.

Posted
29 minutes ago, Honorless said:

Technically Hrathen

Technically: yes.
Actually: no.

9 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

Warbreaker the Peaceful? ;)

Well he was a bit full of it. But not Warbreaker.

  1. This character works to build peace.
  2. This character stood to inherit power.
Posted
1 minute ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Technically: yes.
Actually: no.

Well he was a bit full of it. But not Warbreaker.

  1. This character works to build peace.
  2. This character stood to inherit power.

Elend!

Posted
1 hour ago, Shinwarrior said:

Elend!

Not Elend.
 

33 minutes ago, CallsignZen said:

cultivation

sja anat

taravangian?

Despite quite a range, not Cultivation, Sja-Anat, or Taravangian.
Not Hrathen.
Not Warbreaker.
 

  1. This character works to build peace.
  2. This character stood to inherit power.
  3. This character opposes progression.
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Technically: yes.
Actually: no.

Well he was a bit full of it. But not Warbreaker.

  1. This character works to build peace.
  2. This character stood to inherit power.

Preservation?

Edited by AceBassMan
Posted
2 hours ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Nice one. Royalty threw me for a bit.

  1. This character works to build peace.

Then my plan worked! Mwahahahaha!I was gambling that no one was going to remember that Warbreaker had been a king. And, of course, was also royalty by virtue of being married to one.

30 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Not Elend.
 

Despite quite a range, not Cultivation, Sja-Anat, or Taravangian.
Not Hrathen.
Not Warbreaker.
 

  1. This character works to build peace.
  2. This character stood to inherit power.
  3. This character opposes progression.

Leras?

Posted
50 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

Preservation?

 

20 minutes ago, Kingsdaughter613 said:

Then my plan worked! Mwahahahaha!I was gambling that no one was going to remember that Warbreaker had been a king. And, of course, was also royalty by virtue of being married to one.

Leras?

Neither Leras not the slightly-distinct Preservation.
Not Elend.
Not Cultivation.
Not Sja-Anat.
Not Taravangian.
Not Hrathen.
Not Warbreaker.
 

  1. This character works to build peace.
  2. This character stood to inherit power.
  3. This character opposes progression.
  4. This character abandons a friend.
Posted
2 hours ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

Neither Leras not the slightly-distinct Preservation.
Not Elend.
Not Cultivation.
Not Sja-Anat.
Not Taravangian.
Not Hrathen.
Not Warbreaker.
 

  1. This character works to build peace.
  2. This character stood to inherit power.
  3. This character opposes progression.
  4. This character abandons a friend.

Wow, I'm struggling.. is it Lift?

Posted
21 minutes ago, Shinwarrior said:

Wow, I'm struggling.. is it Lift?

Not Lift, no.
Not Leras.
Not Preservation.
Not Elend.
Not Cultivation.
Not Sja-Anat.
Not Taravangian.
Not Hrathen.
Not Warbreaker.
 

  1. This character works to build peace.
  2. This character stood to inherit power.
  3. This character opposes progression.
  4. This character abandons a friend.
  5. This character was thought to have perished, but no!
Posted
33 minutes ago, CallsignZen said:

….kelsier…??

Not Kelsier.
Not Lift.
Not Leras.
Not Preservation.
Not Elend.
Not Cultivation.
Not Sja-Anat.
Not Taravangian.
Not Hrathen.
Not Warbreaker.
 

  1. This character works to build peace.
  2. This character stood to inherit power.
  3. This character opposes progression.
  4. This character abandons a friend.
  5. This character was thought to have perished, but no!

One last bonus clue, and I'll be back in the morning: This character leads their people to relative safety.

Posted
1 hour ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Not Kelsier.
Not Lift.
Not Leras.
Not Preservation.
Not Elend.
Not Cultivation.
Not Sja-Anat.
Not Taravangian.
Not Hrathen.
Not Warbreaker.
 

  1. This character works to build peace.
  2. This character stood to inherit power.
  3. This character opposes progression.
  4. This character abandons a friend.
  5. This character was thought to have perished, but no!

One last bonus clue, and I'll be back in the morning: This character leads their people to relative safety.

If it's not Thude than I'm guessing that it is from 6th of the dusk cause I haven't read that one. 

Final answer: Thude

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...