Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Dyring is not inside the inn, as normal. Instead, alot of hammering is heard outside, for more then an hour before he comes in again.

 

"What? so who´s to die? No decision yet?"

 

"Can we kill the tineye if we don´t know who´s the inquisitor or the converted is yet?"

Posted (edited)

Kukri looked to Peng. "What now, Lord Mistborn?"

He opened his mouth to give his usual benediction, but Ja had been failing them these past crucial days. Instead...

"Praise the Mistborn!"

godhood!

could whoever snapped PM me?

Edited by jasonpenguin
Posted (edited)

"Well thats helpful isnt it?

 

So you cannot give us names on seekers and the important people. Fine enough"

 

Give us a list of those you and the seekers have seeked. Those you _know_ isnt the inquisitor. sure,they could still be converted but nevermind that. Just state "villages". We wont know who´s important among them, and the inquisitor and any convert already knows their not one of them.

 

You give no info to them, only to us. Throw us a bone you tightmouth"

Edited by dyring
Posted

"But, Master Dyring, if Lord Peng were to give us the names of the people he trusted, surely the inquisitor would target those very people next. Truly, and rightfully, it would be better if he withheld information from the group, and only told us the names of the people he suspected, I think."

Posted

peng sat, flipping through his notes, sipping a mug of ale with metal flakes in it, then stands up on the table, the mud from his boots making a mess of the recently wiped table. dyring won't be happy about that he thought "the fact remains that two among us are not participating in our efforts to root out the inquisitor. They are hiding, avoiding attention, keeping to themselves, watching us die. The inquisitor might be one of them." he points accros the room to where Matheiw and Digits are sitting. "I think we should kill one of them."

 

keeping a low profile, avoiding this thread, and hoping people forget about me is what i would do if i was baldface. And, if we lynch one of them and they aren't guilty, we don't have to feel too bad because they weren't playing the game very actively.

Posted (edited)

"they are not fully trusted now, since they might have been converted. As long as he does not give out those who are a misting, it makes no difference. And what if the inquisitor targets Peng? The lurcher can protect him, but what if the inquisitor hits him together with the converted? then he is dead, and the information lost.

 

I have no particular knowledge about either of them. But Ill vote for whom you say, still. "

Edited by dyring
Posted (edited)

"they are not fully trusted now, since they might have been converted. As long as he does not give out those who are a misting, it makes no difference. And what if the inquisitor targets Peng? The lurcher can protect him, but what if the inquisitor hits him together with the converted? then he is dead, and the information lost.

 

I have no particular knowledge about either of them. But Ill vote for whom you say, still. "

I do not think sharing this information is a good idea, but I'm going to leave it up to you guys in a secondary vote. post yes or no in pink. yes means i should post a list of the people I am pretty sure are innocent, No means I should not.

 

EDIT: if you don't want to make your vote public, you can PM it to me instead

Edited by jasonpenguin
Posted

Well, I´m the one who asked, so yes naturally.

 

And I agree there is a small benefit to them. But a bigger one to us I think. We will lessen the risk of any more paniced poor decisions as the one leading the shimbles death. Worth it imho.

 

  

Posted (edited)

I'm thinking Peng will have to eventually post his info up here for us. I dont think he'll survive the night, honestly.

If I were the Inquisitor, I would have given my convert Coinshot (heres hoping the conversion didn't work).
But let's assume he did. So tonight, if I were the Spiked, I would send in two Coinshot attacks at Peng, and then use our night order to attack him as well.
I don't think we have three lurchers. So unless Peng draws Pewter tonight... I don't think he'll live. So before that happens, we may need that info public.
But really, there's nobody Peng can even trust, realistically. So.... yeah. I have no idea how to proceed from here. And I guess I'll agree, if we're going to hang somebody today, might as well be one of the inactive players.

edit: oooh. That could work out very awesomely, or backfire so bad. How hilarious would it be if Peng sends the list to one of the Spiked? You could send the info to three people to make sure at least one legit person gets the info and spreads it to the group, on the very off chance one or both of the other two are Inquisitors. BUT then sending it to three people increases the risk of an Inquisitor getting that info.

Which if Peng dies, then we're basically screwed anyway.
By Rust and Ruin, Meta! This game is entertainingly difficult!

Edited by Gamma Fiend
Posted (edited)

new idea: I will give the list to one person, to be used in the event of my death?

Edited by jasonpenguin
Posted (edited)

NO, to making the information that you've gathered public.

 

And yes to your suspects. While Mathieu hasn't made a single post yet it's probably because he's just not been online much, or it may just be that he forgot that this game is still going on. Digits on the other hand has been online more often, or at-least when I checked, and from what I can tell he has been avoiding making posts. I'm not too sure that this is suspicious since this may just be because he really wants to avoid getting killed offhand, as happened last time. 

 

EDIT: noticed Peng's last post

Edited by Aspren
Posted (edited)

I'd say two that you genuinely trust. Just in case one dies or is converted, the rest of us still have the info.

Edit: Mathieu and Digits have both been online today. Suspicious?

Edited by Mailliw73
Posted

I'm thinking Peng will have to eventually post his info up here for us. I dont think he'll survive the night, honestly.

If I were the Inquisitor, I would have given my convert Coinshot (heres hoping the conversion didn't work).

But let's assume he did. So tonight, if I were the Spiked, I would send in two Coinshot attacks at Peng, and then use our night order to attack him as well.

I don't think we have three lurchers.

 

Wait, we have two lurchers? I forgot how many of each Misting there are in the game, or is there not a set number?

Posted

There isn't a set number. We started with at least one of each but there were multiple of a few. We don't know which. (Except maybe Peng.)

Posted

Yeah, I was just saying IF we had three lurchers, that'd be cool. But I don't even know if we have ONE left. (Lets hope, at least?)

I thought i already told you guys this? we are down to one lurcher

Posted (edited)

I vote No. Come on guys, let's do this.

And just some random speculation: Baldface won't have coinshottiness or lurchiness, and probably not tineye or pewter. That leaves him with super Smoke, super Riot, and super Soothe, as well as probably some feruchemical stuff. Remember, it has to remain balanced, so we have a chance. Of course, none of this is certain, just some logic.

Also, new snapped could be a lurcher. That or coinshot.

 

EDIT: Also, Ping, I've sent you a bunch of PM's but have not gotten response. Is it just so much to deal with?

Edited by bartbug
Posted

I... think I'd be in favour of the information being posted, with the caveat that you give some kind of indication as to why you think the way you do.

That was the problem with the last vote; I was prepared to follow you since we had no other leads, but we could have used a bit more information; it might have helped us avoid killing Shimble. Even if your list is wrong, it can give us a starting point for finding discrepancies, narrowing the target pool and starting some debate. This is a game where we need to know each other's thought processes.

Have Digits and Mathieu voted at all? If they haven't, I'd be reluctant to knock one of the inactive players out as the 'safe bet'.

Posted (edited)

"Divulging such information at this time would not be wise, I think. However, I do support the idea of you sharing the information with one or two individuals that you trust. Then, you may disclose the names of those that you shared the information with to the group as a whole, in case they turned out to be traitors after all. It would be best if you waited until tonight, after the vote, before you divulged anything, I think."

 

EDIT: "And I do see the wisdom in targeting the less-active members of our group. Perhaps they would like to take the chance to defend themselves?"

Edited by Herowannabe
Posted

Have Digits and Mathieu voted at all? If they haven't, I'd be reluctant to knock one of the inactive players out as the 'safe bet'.

 

Digits last voted on the first day, and Mathieu hasn't yet voted or posted.

Posted

It might be worth it to hit Digits, I think.

 

So far as the information goes, I'd group-PM (new PM, no adding to existing conversations) 4 or 5 people with your suspicions, so they can verify each other going forward if you're killed in the night.

Posted

OOC: I would just like to point out that my new user photo has nothing to do with this game whatsoever. Rather, it has everything to do with this. Happy Valentines Day in a couple weeks everyone!  :wub: 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...