Quick Fix 76: Judgement on the Shores of the Purelake

[TwinStorm He/Him]

This should be right

Vote Count

Aeternum (1): IcedOutPenguin

IcedOutPenguin (3): StrikerEZ, KaladinsSenseofHumorSpren, TwinStorm

Booknewt (1): AskthePizzaGuy

@StrikerEZ you wanted this

Edited August 9, 2025 by TwinStorm
edited for spacing and tagging

[Askthepizzagal He/him]

13 minutes ago, StrikerEZ said:

Okay, anyone got a VC? I could be persuaded to switch my vote to Book. Also, wouldn’t it be wild if Pizza and Twin were elims together? And they’ve just been having fun pretending to be town solvers in thread?

Iced is almost certainly elim, but I’m also wondering if he’s just an extremely off-base villager. Kind of want to townread him because he was way quieter when we played elim together a few games back. 

I could also be persuaded to vote Aet, solely because of vote analysis from D1. 

Can you explain this thought process-

Maybe Book is a hit, even though only Pizza has suggested so, since day 1 happened. But also, smudge and smear Pizza in the next breath.

Iced is almost certainly guilty, but, hedge, caveat, I want to town read him, here's why he's not elim in the next breath.

And can you be here for more than 2 minutes per day phase?

 

[CoderDrag0n8 He/They]

9 minutes ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

@CoderDrag0n8

Would you be willing to vote with me today? Do you have me as a town read?

I do have you as most likely to be town.

I will double check the reasoning, and then vote accordingly.

[Askthepizzagal He/him]

Please do a search for her name on every page of every day of this game.

Note how no one is discussing her, note the reasons I suspected her instantly upon entry day 1, note how no one did anything with that.

Note her lack of solve in her post where she gave reads. Check how neutral and hedgy it is.

Notice she isnt here solving on this critical day, either.

[CoderDrag0n8 He/They]

Just now, Askthepizzaguy said:

Please do a search for her name on every page of every day of this game.

Note how no one is discussing her, note the reasons I suspected her instantly upon entry day 1, note how no one did anything with that.

Note her lack of solve in her post where she gave reads. Check how neutral and hedgy it is.

Notice she isnt here solving on this critical day, either.

I distinctly remember seeing very few Booknewt... However, we do have to consider that she could just be now very active. Or maybe it's been a few off-days for her.

I also did see the few posts she had, and how they rarely said much, but that could also be explained by not having enough time to check.

If you can prove that she isn't just inactive, then I can vote her, but otherwise, Iced is looking very sus.

[Askthepizzagal He/him]

1 minute ago, CoderDrag0n8 said:

If you can prove that she isn't just inactive, then I can vote her, but otherwise, Iced is looking very sus.

Explain the criteria, I am not sure I understand what youre looking for.

Do you want me to quote her posts and explain whats wrong with them?

[StrikerEZ he/him]

13 minutes ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

Can you explain this thought process-

Maybe Book is a hit, even though only Pizza has suggested so, since day 1 happened. But also, smudge and smear Pizza in the next breath.

Iced is almost certainly guilty, but, hedge, caveat, I want to town read him, here's why he's not elim in the next breath.

And can you be here for more than 2 minutes per day phase?

 

It was honestly just me thinking out loud. From my perspective you seem very villagery, but I tend to get paranoid about people that seem super villagery to me. That was the whole thought process. And also isn’t Twin also pushing Book?

Also this is kind of the best I can do right now. I’ve got more homework today, DCI finals is tonight, and I have two tests to take by end of day Monday.

Anyway, Booknewt.

[Askthepizzagal He/him]

4 minutes ago, StrikerEZ said:

It was honestly just me thinking out loud. From my perspective you seem very villagery, but I tend to get paranoid about people that seem super villagery to me. That was the whole thought process. And also isn’t Twin also pushing Book?

Also this is kind of the best I can do right now. I’ve got more homework today, DCI finals is tonight, and I have two tests to take by end of day Monday.

Anyway, Booknewt.

Is Twin pushing book? Where?

Until just now Twin had Book as a town read all game and thought her reads and votes were great.

It wasnt until I suggested she was guilty and why did that reverse, and Twin is not actually voting Book, just asking her to respond to the suspicion.

That's neutral at best, no offense Twin. Just describing the behavior here accurately, not shade.

[TwinStorm He/Him]

8 minutes ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

Is Twin pushing book? Where?

Until just now Twin had Book as a town read all game and thought her reads and votes were great.

It wasnt until I suggested she was guilty and why did that reverse, and Twin is not actually voting Book, just asking her to respond to the suspicion.

That's neutral at best, no offense Twin. Just describing the behavior here accurately, not shade.

None taken. 

I've honestly not been paying attention to Book most of game, just seeing her posts and thinking them okay, not "great"

Everything Pizza's said has been right, but I don't like voting on her without her proving herself, when there's also the fairly guilty party of Penguin.

[Ookla the Newt she/her]

1 hour ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

They do not actually sit and discuss with people, they feign activity a little bit when theyre here, they arent trying to solve a mystery, theyre not inquisitive, theyre not making waves, most of their reads are listed as neutral and the remainder hedge, which is the same as being neutral, and the very few reads they made outside of that, were suspicions on townies or town reads of mine.

They do not appear concerned with solving this game, not really. They appear concerned about getting to the next day and the next day and letting everything else resolve itself.

I've mainly been concerned with getting to the next day bc I've been on a road trip, and the rest of today's the first time I've been able to actually sit down and look through stuff throughly and actually analyse phrasing and such. Other times I've been online in a car, or near midnight in a hotel room, or right after waking up while the rest of my family's been getting ready.

24 minutes ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

Notice she isnt here solving on this critical day, either.

Because I was on a hike bc mandatory family time. Same with most of yesterday. If you want to vote me bc of that, that's a decision.

10 hours ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

@Booknewt Can you describe why you chose Hoid over Penguin?

I voted HoidSlayer half as a tossup, because I was placed in a tricky position, with very little time to do analysis. So I mainly just went by vibes, and was worried that I was viewing Penguin too negatively based solely on his comments in very early C2. I decided if he actually was elim he wouldn't have been making waves that much, so voted HoidSlayer. That was my rational, like it or not.

[Askthepizzagal He/him]

If I do a search for "book", a few things that have nothing to do with Booknewt pop up in the first day, but otherwise, beyond tallies and mentions of her name in a neutral manner, acknowledging that she is a player in the game, this is everything about Newt.

 

 

On 8/7/2025 at 11:29 PM, Askthepizzaguy said:

Of those not present, I believe Var, the shorter fellow, to be more innocent, and the Booknewt to be more criminal leaning, with intent to vote them if they do not show up.

 

Because she wasnt being discussed.

Surprise, two minutes later, she arrives.
 

On 8/7/2025 at 11:31 PM, Booknewt said:

Ooooops, I'm rly sry, I didn't realize that ppl posted this much during SE and hadn't checked the shard until like 5 minutes ago. Also I kinda have no idea what I'm doing. (I read the rules and understand them, just still figuring out the rhythm of an actual game)

From playing Mafia, I kinda think IcedOutPenguin is jumping on the bandwagon a lot, which usually indicates trying to seem non-guilty, so that's my vote. 

Edit: Also I sent this before reading what Pizzaguy said (I was scared clicking show new message would delete my message if I hadn't sent it). Why do you think I'm more criminal leaning?

So what she is saying, without saying it, is that she has been reading and following the game and not commenting or getting involved.

 

On 8/7/2025 at 11:34 PM, Askthepizzaguy said:

Because Striker was discussed and voted and talked about and you were not.

And because I had a lot of town reads all game- A LOT of town reads all game, I start to look at the folks who arent playing.

Of those, KelsierApologist is by far the most villagery, with Striker and Book in a dead heat, but this is what I used to tiebreak it.
 

On 8/8/2025 at 2:02 AM, Askthepizzaguy said:

Long quote snipped, here is the relevant bit

 

Booknewt did nothing much, so if Penguin is innocent, I wouldn't suggest Booknewt is. They showed signs of having basically read everything before talking, which is cautious behavior I associate with the guilty, nervousness, essentially.

Striker didn't show up, and should have, but they're probably town given the other susses toward the slot and also, due to how many susses I actually have here, the five named above.

This is how I was solving those slots.

On 8/8/2025 at 4:46 AM, Booknewt said:

Well, that's helpful to know actually. I've been going by mafia experience... 

This is her contribution on day 2, is just pleasantries.

On 8/8/2025 at 5:10 AM, Booknewt said:

Okay, thanks! (also yeah I'm starting to see the layers on layers bit...)

 

Current Leanings

No particular opinions on: Aeternum, Kaladfin / TwinStorm, Doc12 / Javert, KaladinsSenseOfHumorSpren, Striker, Kelsier Apologist (I know I'm veryyy neutral on a lot of people)

Hoid Slayer: Mentioned that he's worried elims might target him, which might be something similar to something I've seen before in a mafia game where a kid convinced the doctor to always protect him bc he was the "detective" (he was the mafia) or maybe I'm just reading too deeply into that comment.

Penguin: Not really suspicious of him anymore, he was like 50% a "I have no idea what I'm doing lemme go with a vague hunch" vote. Kinda acting weird during this Cycle, though. Very vehement he's not an Evildoer

Askthepizzaguy: I honestly think PizzaGuy's town. If he was mafia (or whatever term is being used *checks rules* Evildoers) he wouldn't be standing out this much. I can understand not knowing who to vote for - I half randomly picked based on a hunch. 

CoderDrag0n8: Maybe pushing innocence a little too hard, but might be bc he's new, and doesn't know exactly how this works, so I'll give him a pass for now.

Really actually read this list of opinions.

Aeternum is town, nearly lock, in my opinion, none from her.

Kaladfin is no read.

Doc, easily someone you can have an opinion on before he died, is town, no opinion.

No opinion on Kaladins can make sense, no issue there.

Striker, no opinion, that makes lots of sense.

Kelsier, no opinion, can make sense.

Hoid Slayer, remember, this is a list of opinions and leans. Describe what alignment is being leaned in this entry. Can you?

Penguin, this is a list of leans, not really suspicious anymore for no reason, but he is also weird.

Me, I'm town. Sure.

Coder, this is a list of leans, tell me what alignment is being leaned here. Maybe bad, but, pass.

So you can understand why this list of leans isn't really a list of actual leans. There are no leans. There is one name that has an alignment, me, in 12 other players besides her.
 

On 8/8/2025 at 5:20 AM, Aeternum said:

Do you have any specific examples that led you to this conclusion?

Knowing Pizza, it's unsurprising how much he's talking 

Can you respond to my questions when you have a chance btw.

Sir, I invited you to this game to have a chill game where you don't need to do that smh.

Aeternum asks a basic solving question.

On 8/8/2025 at 5:25 AM, Booknewt said:

Prob the following (hopefully these work quotes have NOT been cooperative with me): First is kinda neutral-sounding, but sounds like its trying to be neutral sounding, but then again it sounds like something I'd say, so I might be reading too much into this, and second is prob intro-rp in retrospect, so I take back the negative lean as I type this out. 

Tell me what alignment lean you glean from this answer. This goes from being a lean if you squint, to being even less of one.

On 8/8/2025 at 5:52 AM, Aeternum said:

Tyty. I ask because you directly parroted a point Iced made early d1, which I'm not a fan of you doing.

Aeternum points out she is just borrowing content from someone else, and she doesn't have a response, and no one in the game follows up on it.

On 8/8/2025 at 2:55 PM, Booknewt said:

Yeah, I have the same question

"I am also here", look at the actual timestamps.

This person showed up, didnt participate in the discussion, made this comment to blend in with the discussion, didnt actually try to solve a mystery, and bounced.

20 hours ago, Doc12 said:

Booknewt: New, a couple of posts. Made a post with reads on players, mostly reading everyone neutral. 50/50 shot here. Do you think you could update your reads list based on happenings this cycle?  

No updates, no reads.

19 hours ago, TwinStorm said:

Alright, read time

Booknewt is giving me village appeal, with some solid early reads and votes.

Doing a search for everyone even mentioning Book, this pops up.

18 hours ago, IcedOutPenguin said:

He didn't do much in cycle one, other than provide a few thoughts and vote counts

I think he's trying to exe either Hoid Slayer or CD, neither of which are likely elims.

I think Twinstorm is another Elim. I don't know who the other would be, Booknewt, maybe? 

The reason I think he's an Elim in the first place is by process of Elimination, it's not me, Pizza, CD, or Hoid Slayer, and probobly not Ksause or KelsierApologist. That leaves Aeter, Doc, Striker, TwinStorm, and Booknewt.

Here is iced clustering Book in with lots of other names, but not voting there.

 

18 hours ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

Twin, Striker, Booknewt, and Ksauce for me, are hovering around null and some of them read like theyre just trying to get to the next round without kicking up a fuss or interacting with me too much.

I don't thiiiink Booknewt is wolf anymore but I also can't shield them specifically? Give them a day pass maybe, if you think you can agree on the day pass anyway.

This is me mentioning Book before I try to get her involved in the game directly by end of that day.

18 hours ago, Doc12 said:

I really want @KelsierApologist @KaladinsSenseOfHumorSpren and @Booknewt to tell me who they're actually suspicious of and vote. 

He was murdered.

16 hours ago, Booknewt said:

Sorry! I'm on a family road trip, and was on a hike literally all day. Also I'm typing this in a car with a veryyyy loud little brother in the seat next to me, so my analysis may not be the best, since I'm tired, nauseous, and have a little brother fake "shooting" me. (I'm not busy at all tomorrow starting 2 pm EST though, so I'll be very active then, and will actually have good analysis)

Andddd looks like I'm the tiebreaker... Okay, this'll be interesting bc I am barely capable of analysis rn. Give me like 3 minutes

So let's examine the thought process here.

15 hours ago, Booknewt said:

Okay, I feel REALLY guilty after what he just said, but... Hoid Slayer. Sorry, but it A) proves both Penguin and him, and (B) he's still suspect after last night.

Might rethink this, but I have to help unpack stuff rn, so I'll check back in like 15 minutes

Edit: Yeah, I still feel that way. I know he's tried explaining his decision last night, and I'm sorry if it really was a genuine random move, but for now he's my best bet.

Basically, Booknewt borrows other people's suspicion to determine the vote.

Which she would inherently understand, if she was parked and following the game, having read up, but choosing not to interact.

That's what that reasoning absolutely must imply.


Now she is here. I have summoned her.

[CoderDrag0n8 He/They]

34 minutes ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

Explain the criteria, I am not sure I understand what youre looking for.

Do you want me to quote her posts and explain whats wrong with them?

3 minutes ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

If I do a search for "book", a few things that have nothing to do with Booknewt pop up in the first day, but otherwise, beyond tallies and mentions of her name in a neutral manner, acknowledging that she is a player in the game, this is everything about Newt.

 

 

 

Because she wasnt being discussed.

Surprise, two minutes later, she arrives.
 

So what she is saying, without saying it, is that she has been reading and following the game and not commenting or getting involved.

 

And because I had a lot of town reads all game- A LOT of town reads all game, I start to look at the folks who arent playing.

Of those, KelsierApologist is by far the most villagery, with Striker and Book in a dead heat, but this is what I used to tiebreak it.
 

This is how I was solving those slots.

This is her contribution on day 2, is just pleasantries.

Really actually read this list of opinions.

Aeternum is town, nearly lock, in my opinion, none from her.

Kaladfin is no read.

Doc, easily someone you can have an opinion on before he died, is town, no opinion.

No opinion on Kaladins can make sense, no issue there.

Striker, no opinion, that makes lots of sense.

Kelsier, no opinion, can make sense.

Hoid Slayer, remember, this is a list of opinions and leans. Describe what alignment is being leaned in this entry. Can you?

Penguin, this is a list of leans, not really suspicious anymore for no reason, but he is also weird.

Me, I'm town. Sure.

Coder, this is a list of leans, tell me what alignment is being leaned here. Maybe bad, but, pass.

So you can understand why this list of leans isn't really a list of actual leans. There are no leans. There is one name that has an alignment, me, in 12 other players besides her.
 

Aeternum asks a basic solving question.

Tell me what alignment lean you glean from this answer. This goes from being a lean if you squint, to being even less of one.

Aeternum points out she is just borrowing content from someone else, and she doesn't have a response, and no one in the game follows up on it.

"I am also here", look at the actual timestamps.

This person showed up, didnt participate in the discussion, made this comment to blend in with the discussion, didnt actually try to solve a mystery, and bounced.

No updates, no reads.

Doing a search for everyone even mentioning Book, this pops up.

Here is iced clustering Book in with lots of other names, but not voting there.

 

This is me mentioning Book before I try to get her involved in the game directly by end of that day.

He was murdered.

So let's examine the thought process here.

Basically, Booknewt borrows other people's suspicion to determine the vote.

Which she would inherently understand, if she was parked and following the game, having read up, but choosing not to interact.

That's what that reasoning absolutely must imply.


Now she is here. I have summoned her.

That seems like good enough evidence.

Booknewt, care to explain yourself?

[Ookla the Newt she/her]

3 minutes ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

Because she wasnt being discussed.

Surprise, two minutes later, she arrives.

 

4 minutes ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

Basically, Booknewt borrows other people's suspicion to determine the vote.

Which she would inherently understand, if she was parked and following the game, having read up, but choosing not to interact.

That's what that reasoning absolutely must imply.


Now she is here. I have summoned her.

OKAY. Ppl have been suspecting me all day, and I was being discussed all day, so that was a complete coincidence. I didn't show up then to "hedge and be unclear" did I?

I've been "choosing not to interact" bc I barely have any idea how this works. Also, I will freely admit trying to get to today - I've known since Monday I'll be free this afternoon, and wanted to be able to actually get to today when I can actually analyse stuff. My "read[ing] up" is a brief skim over comments.

 

I'm sorry if this seems aggressive, just... yeah.

[Askthepizzagal He/him]

1 minute ago, Booknewt said:

Ppl have been suspecting me all day, and I was being discussed all day

No, they have not.

This happened just recently, by me alone.

[Ookla the Newt she/her]

10 hours ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

@Booknewt Can you describe why you chose Hoid over Penguin?

2 hours ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

Of the remaining 3 names in your pile-o-suspects, @IcedOutPenguin would you be willing to vote for Booknewt, or Twinstorm, or Striker?

 

Is there any reason you have to vote any of those names?

Can you tell me in particular how you feel about Booknewt, who I can't find anyone but me or the dead even discussing?

1 hour ago, TwinStorm said:

@Booknewt: Fairly neutral rn, willing to believe you're town for a bit, though some explanation on why you chose Hoid Slayer is necessary, before I can make a decision.

[Askthepizzagal He/him]

Is that your evidence of you being discussed all day as a suspect by others?

Me, me, and a neutral slash town lean in a leans list containing all the players?

 

Edited August 9, 2025 by Askthepizzaguy
slash town

[Ookla the Newt she/her]

That is my evidence of my being discussed. And pinged.

If you want to argue me as being elim, then fine, argue me as being elim. But argue me as being elim based on stuff I've said, or on my votes, not on the fact that I'm new, this is literally my first game, I barely know how this game works, have habits of backreading instead of responding bc I've lurked on the forums for about a year and a half, and have been on a road trip typing things in a moving car.

I promise you - my showing up just then was a coincidence. People have mentioned me all day. Also that was just a sample, I didn't put all of them. Since not putting every instance of my name is apparently an indication of guilt, here are some more. 

If I was going to show up when I was being indicated, wouldn't I do that when I was first being indicated instead of an hour later?

54 minutes ago, CoderDrag0n8 said:

I distinctly remember seeing very few Booknewt... However, we do have to consider that she could just be now very active. Or maybe it's been a few off-days for her.

I also did see the few posts she had, and how they rarely said much, but that could also be explained by not having enough time to check.

If you can prove that she isn't just inactive, then I can vote her, but otherwise, Iced is looking very sus.

 

47 minutes ago, StrikerEZ said:

It was honestly just me thinking out loud. From my perspective you seem very villagery, but I tend to get paranoid about people that seem super villagery to me. That was the whole thought process. And also isn’t Twin also pushing Book?

Also this is kind of the best I can do right now. I’ve got more homework today, DCI finals is tonight, and I have two tests to take by end of day Monday.

Anyway, Booknewt.

 

1 hour ago, TwinStorm said:

Alright, this makes a ton of sense. For rn tho, I'm going to ask @Booknewt to defend herself, and vote IcedOutPenguin who at this point, after refusing to say why he voted for me, and little explanatin against Doc, I'm fairly sure is elim.

 

[Askthepizzagal He/him]

1 minute ago, Booknewt said:

If you want to argue me as being elim, then fine, argue me as being elim. But argue me as being elim based on stuff I've said, or on my votes, not on the fact that I'm new, this is literally my first game, I barely know how this game works, have habits of backreading instead of responding bc I've lurked on the forums for about a year and a half, and have been on a road trip typing things in a moving car.

Let me turn down the temperature a bit.

*soft spoken*

Book, I did in fact argue you were an elim based on what you said, explaining why what you said indicates that you are guilty and not really solving the mystery, due to the content of your posts.

And the votes you are making, and how others in the game are treating you. Everything I am saying must be considered in-bounds.

I never mentioned nor made an inference on your alignment based on being new.

Additionally, your being busy or not, doesn't affect your alignment itself, I can accept youve been busy. However, I still believe you are guilty based on the content of your posts and your solve and how others in the game have treated your slot.

In a most impersonal manner, I assure you. I am sure you are a lovely person, this is my guess, and it is a guessing game and I am allowed to be right, wrong, or guilty myself, in order to make this accusation.

Can we agree to these terms?

And also, I would like you to now also acknowledge that I did in fact case you almost solely on your content and not, factually, did not accuse you based on being new.

Because we should be honest if we're innocent.

[Ookla the Newt she/her]

Okay, sorry if that was a bit aggressive. Just kinda frustrated.

I get that you weren't arguing that I was an elim based on my being new, just that a lot of the stuff that you were casing me on was due to my being new. (should've been clearer about that)

The argument about my posts being hedgy is fair, and honestly a lot of my approach during the first few days was similar to what an elim would be doing - trying to get to the next day. 

5 minutes ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

Can we agree to these terms?

And also, I would like you to now also acknowledge that I did in fact case you almost solely on your content and not, factually, did not accuse you based on being new.

I can agree to these terms. Note, however, I was not accusing you of accusing me based on being new, but saying that what you were arguing was due to my being new.

[Askthepizzagal He/him]

Ok.

Hey, Book... I'm innocent (you dont have to believe this) and I very much don't believe in making my suspect feel bad, and I always, always, always consider worlds where I am wrong.

What I need from you, if you still believe me to be innocent, is to now just ignore my vote for you and just, take your time, read the game, and make those reads however way you believe you can, make guesses, come up with reasons.

If I am wrong about you, it is very very good practice anyway, to exercise those "I think it could be this" muscle.

Also, if I am wrong about you, this is the only way I could really see it, is to see your solve in full action.

Not a demand, not even a request, just a suggestion on how we proceed forward together, if youre innocent.

I laid out the case work, its up to everyone else to show me why it is wrong, and also, you can do that by being villagery and truthful and honest and guess who the elims are. I might still guess you wrong after. Thats okay. That's on me at that point.

It's never your fault when someone else guesses you wrong, if you simply speak truth to them.

Thats my entire philosophy. Its on me if I made an error here, so dont feel like you made the error.

[Ookla the Newt she/her]

All right. Sorry again that I jumped to conclusions about what your accusation is based on.

I'm making a log of literally every significant thing that's happened so far, so my reads might be a while

[Askthepizzagal He/him]

ThatOneWorldHopper
The Unknown Order
Hoid Slayer
Doc12
Askthepizzaguy
Aeternum
KelsierApologist
Starseeker- not safely town, but leaning that way
CoderDragon- not safely town, but leaning that way
TwinStorm- read dependent on actions, and how others flip. 
StrikerEZ- like others, depends on what he does, and how others flip.
Iced- complicated, this person can be innocent its just really hard to see that and I cant shield him, all I can do is look at literally any world where he is innocent and what that would imply.
Booknewt- I explained where the suspicion came from.
 

Booknewt, if innocent, has an extremely valuable perspective on the game right now because she knows my top suspect is innocent. But, if most of my other reads are much better, then this is her roadmap from my own chair.

If I could have marked down Hoid as definitely innocent yesterday, it would have been extremely helpful to me. Same with if Iced is innocent here. Same if Book is.

Striker, I basically need his help to flip an elim today, and most days, until the game is over, if he is innocent. That's my path forward together with Striker, and even so, i usually just die.

I really love a lot of Twinstorm's posts and I badly want to work with him because he seems to care and show up and that means a lot when Kelsier won't, but I can't lock him innocent either.

Coder, I am starting to feel like he lacks an agenda and is mostly actually lost, but i don't know if I can get to a solid, solid town read I would always be comfortable with. It's just a town read. I also think some of his more random votes might have been hits, as it happens, which would be amusing to him if he is town.

Starseeker, Ive been really... really struggling to get there. i don't like sneaking from one day to the next, I like it when everyone collaborates and is open and active, as much as possible. I was wary of this person on both previous days, but I wanted to find them innocent if possible. I am leaning this is the case, because they are putting in both the RP and the effort. It's just hard for me to be super solid about it.

Kelsier, I'm still shielding. I think the exchange I had with them on day 1 was something not from an elim, strongly. If I am pocketed, then I am, but my vote doesn't go there unless something shows guilt.

Aeternum should never be elim here. I stake the game on it.

I am afraid some of my other guesses of town have already died, so the people I deeply trust is a circle that has been shrinking every day instead of expanding like I would prefer. It was not Seth and it was never doc, it should never be Aeternum, and I will shield Kelsier until the cycle I die. And I'm relying on hopefully two of Twin, Starseeker, and Coder to come through for me as innocent.

And if anyone is innocent in those bottom 3 names I badly need them to shine and make their mark on the game now, not later.

And I did this all afternoon instead of sleeping. I really need to do that. My apologies.

[TwinStorm He/Him]

4 minutes ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

ThatOneWorldHopper
The Unknown Order
Hoid Slayer
Doc12
Askthepizzaguy
Aeternum
KelsierApologist
Starseeker- not safely town, but leaning that way
CoderDragon- not safely town, but leaning that way
TwinStorm- read dependent on actions, and how others flip. 
StrikerEZ- like others, depends on what he does, and how others flip.
Iced- complicated, this person can be innocent its just really hard to see that and I cant shield him, all I can do is look at literally any world where he is innocent and what that would imply.
Booknewt- I explained where the suspicion came from.
 

Booknewt, if innocent, has an extremely valuable perspective on the game right now because she knows my top suspect is innocent. But, if most of my other reads are much better, then this is her roadmap from my own chair.

If I could have marked down Hoid as definitely innocent yesterday, it would have been extremely helpful to me. Same with if Iced is innocent here. Same if Book is.

Striker, I basically need his help to flip an elim today, and most days, until the game is over, if he is innocent. That's my path forward together with Striker, and even so, i usually just die.

I really love a lot of Twinstorm's posts and I badly want to work with him because he seems to care and show up and that means a lot when Kelsier won't, but I can't lock him innocent either.

Coder, I am starting to feel like he lacks an agenda and is mostly actually lost, but i don't know if I can get to a solid, solid town read I would always be comfortable with. It's just a town read. I also think some of his more random votes might have been hits, as it happens, which would be amusing to him if he is town.

Starseeker, Ive been really... really struggling to get there. i don't like sneaking from one day to the next, I like it when everyone collaborates and is open and active, as much as possible. I was wary of this person on both previous days, but I wanted to find them innocent if possible. I am leaning this is the case, because they are putting in both the RP and the effort. It's just hard for me to be super solid about it.

Kelsier, I'm still shielding. I think the exchange I had with them on day 1 was something not from an elim, strongly. If I am pocketed, then I am, but my vote doesn't go there unless something shows guilt.

Aeternum should never be elim here. I stake the game on it.

I am afraid some of my other guesses of town have already died, so the people I deeply trust is a circle that has been shrinking every day instead of expanding like I would prefer. It was not Seth and it was never doc, it should never be Aeternum, and I will shield Kelsier until the cycle I die. And I'm relying on hopefully two of Twin, Starseeker, and Coder to come through for me as innocent.

And if anyone is innocent in those bottom 3 names I badly need them to shine and make their mark on the game now, not later.

And I did this all afternoon instead of sleeping. I really need to do that. My apologies.

good job caring abt SE, Pizza

Tanks for your section on me tis nice compliment

[CoderDrag0n8 He/They]

3 minutes ago, Askthepizzaguy said:

ThatOneWorldHopper
The Unknown Order
Hoid Slayer
Doc12
Askthepizzaguy
Aeternum
KelsierApologist
Starseeker- not safely town, but leaning that way
CoderDragon- not safely town, but leaning that way
TwinStorm- read dependent on actions, and how others flip. 
StrikerEZ- like others, depends on what he does, and how others flip.
Iced- complicated, this person can be innocent its just really hard to see that and I cant shield him, all I can do is look at literally any world where he is innocent and what that would imply.
Booknewt- I explained where the suspicion came from.
 

Booknewt, if innocent, has an extremely valuable perspective on the game right now because she knows my top suspect is innocent. But, if most of my other reads are much better, then this is her roadmap from my own chair.

If I could have marked down Hoid as definitely innocent yesterday, it would have been extremely helpful to me. Same with if Iced is innocent here. Same if Book is.

Striker, I basically need his help to flip an elim today, and most days, until the game is over, if he is innocent. That's my path forward together with Striker, and even so, i usually just die.

I really love a lot of Twinstorm's posts and I badly want to work with him because he seems to care and show up and that means a lot when Kelsier won't, but I can't lock him innocent either.

Coder, I am starting to feel like he lacks an agenda and is mostly actually lost, but i don't know if I can get to a solid, solid town read I would always be comfortable with. It's just a town read. I also think some of his more random votes might have been hits, as it happens, which would be amusing to him if he is town.

Starseeker, Ive been really... really struggling to get there. i don't like sneaking from one day to the next, I like it when everyone collaborates and is open and active, as much as possible. I was wary of this person on both previous days, but I wanted to find them innocent if possible. I am leaning this is the case, because they are putting in both the RP and the effort. It's just hard for me to be super solid about it.

Kelsier, I'm still shielding. I think the exchange I had with them on day 1 was something not from an elim, strongly. If I am pocketed, then I am, but my vote doesn't go there unless something shows guilt.

Aeternum should never be elim here. I stake the game on it.

I am afraid some of my other guesses of town have already died, so the people I deeply trust is a circle that has been shrinking every day instead of expanding like I would prefer. It was not Seth and it was never doc, it should never be Aeternum, and I will shield Kelsier until the cycle I die. And I'm relying on hopefully two of Twin, Starseeker, and Coder to come through for me as innocent.

And if anyone is innocent in those bottom 3 names I badly need them to shine and make their mark on the game now, not later.

And I did this all afternoon instead of sleeping. I really need to do that. My apologies.

I will say that I have finally started to pick up how the game works, and currently have a critique against the Booknewt elim

As Booknewt is saying, I feel like her behavior can be explained simply through inactivity and rellative newcomer

So, I feel Booknewt is leaning more innocent than IcedOutPenguin who is not only looking crazy sus, but has also stopped talking since booknewt has been brought up while I know he has been online and posting (in HTKAD)

@IcedOutPenguin, any defense?

(also i'm doing this while supposed to be doing homework so...)

[Askthepizzagal He/him]

3 minutes ago, TwinStorm said:

good job caring abt SE, Pizza

Tanks for your section on me tis nice compliment

You've been hovering above null and positive all game.

I just recognize that you're probably good at the game no matter your current alignment.

If I die "tonight", if Iced is innocent, my legacy remains basically the same here. Check Book and also the folks who chose Iced over book. If book is innocent, I've made an error, and I hope that forgiveness goes both ways in that event.

If Book is guilty, I double down on that town pile because those town reads are why I got to Book in particular as the main suspect I have outside of Penguin, here.

Penguin suggested her name, but not why, and not with a vote. They can be together, or, it can be one or the other.

I think those 2 names should be the choices today, and I dont know if we have the activity or personnel to divide ourselves into three wagons.

I also won't be here. So someone probably needs to care pretty hard about the rest of the day phase and also be an innocent that people trust, in order for this day to end in a successful move instead of putting us up against the absolute limit of mistakes we can afford.

If we get there and we fail, it's okay. We guess, and wrong guesses are still legal.