Jo and the Bush

Noted! Hrmmm. . . Maybe. Sure for right now. Given the actual wait time of running a game, and the eagerness with which some people have to run games, (Such as me, who would happily run every game), I'm actually going to go talk to the others about how many times someone can appear on the list. Like, I have half a dozen games ready to run currently. Should I sign up for half a dozen slots and run 6 games back to back, preventing anyone elso from getting to GM for half a year? Obviously not, but where is the 'acceptable' amount of multiple sign-ups at once?

Done. Know anything about what game you want to run?

So did we ever come to a final desicion on who's running LG112? Is it @Aeoryi or is it @The Unknown Medallion? I know that TUM is prepping his Meta game. Aeoryi do you have a game ready?

Okie dokie, you have been added!

Noted! Noted! This is the List we have of GM's. It's somewhat difficult to predict how long you would have to wait. Currently, if Aeoryi doesn't decide to GM LG112, it will be TUN. If TUN decides not to, I'll keep going down the list by asking Twinstorm, Tow, Wahrheit, and Araris. Those 4 are pretty far down the list, so we normally wouldn't expect them to be running a game already, but because everyone else said no, it might happen. (It won't, TUN is getting his game ready, so if Aeoryi does say no, he'll be running LG112) But basically, just because you're low on the list, it doesn't mean that it will be a long time. On average, a game is posted every 26.17 days (taking only the past two years of games into account), and goes in order of LG - MR - LG - QF. If your really want to run a game, and others are a bit busy? You could sign up for a QF and potentially run it 3 months from now. More likely is you sign up for a Long Game and run it 11 months from now. Worst case scenario,, the 35 inactive GM's on the list come back to activity and the wait time to run a game increases to 6 years. What type of game? Long Game, Mid-Range, or Quick Fix?

Alrighty. There's still 10 others to choose from, so don't do it if you don't think you can. Thanks for the spectacularly quick response! @Hoid Slayer and @KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren you two are now in spots 4 and 5. If Xino, TUN, and Kasimir can't run it, do either of you have both a game an the time? Xino has confirmed via Discord that they are unavailable to run a game right now.

Hello GM's, now that QF79 has started, we should start looking for the GM of LG112! The QF probably has less than two weeks, so the signups for LG112 will hopefully go up between May 17th and May 24th. @xinoehp512, you are at the top of the list currently, twice actually! If you want it, it's yours. We don't currently have a game approved from you. Any ideas? After that it's @Aeoryi, who apparently has a role-madness Mistborn game in the works. @Jo and the Bush, you're in third in line, also with no game listed. If Xino and Aeoryi can't take it, can you? @The Unknown Medallion, you're fourth, and according to the spreadsheet, you have an unapproved game involving Nightblood and Breath Mechanics. Is that ready to go if your three predecessors can't do it? @Kasimir, you're fifth. Hopefully we don't have to go down that far, but do you have a game to run if it gets down to you? Thanks, but I'm a bit busy with school for the next 5 weeks. After that I should be able to run a game, but not right now.

I have a little under a week to decide if I can spare the time to play SE. Oohhhh, I want to play in this game so bad. If I haven't signed up by Thursday, someone ping me to remind me to decide. Speaking of pings, @Fizz9, do you want to play in this game?

Agreed. I am not available to GM at this time.

Noted!

Are they told whether or not they failed? Because if they are, then it's actually just 100% chance of success, and if they aren't, then this ability is spectacularly useless. I would urge caution with having a fail chance that gives the opposite alignment, because it either forces players to spend two cycles on every alignment check, or results in bad executions that get the player doing the seeking executed. If you want to have a fail chance, I would say have the failure not give them any alignment, so they know it failed but receive no information. I'm somewhat confused about the wording here. It sounds like you're rolling at random for each player when the game begins to determine their role? I can't tell if they have a chance to become all of these things, or if they only have a chance to become one of the 5 of (Vanilla, Captain, Councilor, Inquisitor, Witch). The Aes Sedai Witches and the Annointed Council can roleblock players, but it looks like literally only the Aes Sedai Witches and Shadow Informants have actual actions that can be roleblocked? Being an Aes Sedai Witch doesn't seem at all useful, and the Shadow Informant's action is one-use. What is the purpose of roleblocking at all?

Noted. You are on the List

Noted!