You're right. my post was not worded well, and was moderately adversarial. I should have arranged and worded my post in a nicer way, and one that more directly adresses the prompt, such as:
But, you have to keep in mind a few things. Firstly, this is text-only communication. That means that a lot of things will accidently take on negative connotations that are not intended. The second thing is a result of the worlds we're all fans of. Since the magics and world building are so solid, we, as a community tend to want hard evidence or a lot of evidence. With so much info out about Kal, and so many fans of him, a lot of theories are going to be shut down quick, since everybody is so familiar with the topic. As a result, to work in this community, you need to respond to critique one of two ways.(we're all guilty of not doing this, but to foster a good community it's good to try) Either provide more evidence to support your claim, or actively disprove others' critiques.
While bringing up that my and returned's critique were made in bad faith is valid, in such an evidence-based community, it's important to respond to the arguments made, as simply claiming that someone should not have made the argument in the way they did does not invalidate their point.
Lastly, (I'll admit I'm quite guilty of this) as a result of the way the community functions, and it's identity as a forum, it's important to try your best to avoid sounding as though you are personally attacking someone, and admit when you're wrong.
I promise, nobody's trying to attack you, just communicate with you.