Jump to content

Through The Living Ash

Members
  • Posts

    626
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Through The Living Ash

  1. Looking at the relative sizes of the moons the way it mentions in the World Guide, I had a thought: Does the size of the moon correlate to how much the respective Shard Invested Roshar? Cultivation seemingly did far less than Odium and Honor, but as Honor was on Roshar before Odium it would make sense that he Invested the planet more. I'm not suggesting that the size of the moon would change if they suddenly Invested the planet more or less, but that it was potentially planned that way. I like the theory of the 4th moon falling during the Shattering, although perhaps better if it was not an intentional act.
  2. "That was both direction and actual distance. But," he gestures in front of himself, "if we were to assume that this is forward, then we are trying to go..." he spins around and points again, "this way. And if you were to look, you would see in that direction a planet, for which we are trying to go about 12 degrees down from the equator and 40 miles offset to the right from what we would view as the center." Give me a little bit to think about it.
  3. Chips is correct (for once). Jerome is the monkey controlled by @Uninteligenius while Bartholomew is the fish with legs that I control. And Bartholomew most certainly does have echolocation.
  4. blind Chouta sampling, poetry by
  5. Bartholomew echolocates you and then nabs the sandwich.
  6. : duet by Wayne and Lopen
  7. "Spherically, it's at 35.04 degrees, 120948376 kilometers, 12.69743 degrees from Cep's reference direction."
  8. Second nodded. "Yes, I am ready. And a word of advise: while you certainly have a skill for theatrics, sometimes people enjoy a little more... subtlety."
  9. "Transportation. That is the job that you were assigned."
  10. His daddy being Brutus. Brutus
  11. Doug does not. This caused
  12. I know; I'm very impressive. You should applaud now.
  13. No, based on your logic, if there is another 2: 2+2+2=(2+2)+2 associative property of addition (2+2)+2=7+2 substitution 2=2 identity property of inequality 7+2=9 substitution 9=42 identity property of inequality (skip)
  14. "We could... ask nicely?" This bit is not exactly playing out how I thought it would
  15. I gratefully accept the eyeballs.
  16. Also, if there was another 2, it still wouldn't be 6. It would be 42.
  17. No. Although I can see how you make that connection, that was entirely unintentional. Taeidin shakes his head. "No, far too far to walk."
  18. But I could make that argument for the plus sign as well (skip)
×
×
  • Create New...