Well, I am Agnostic.
So it in general means I am confused.
But I also basically share many atheist beliefs.
I agree with Kansas (a little) and I personally find it offensive to believe one can only have mortality if they are religious.
Without god, why wouldn't you kill people? Empathy.
If every feeling is fake, if everything we percieve is merely a byproduct of meaningless photons entering our eyes, so what?
I still feel those feelings, and nothing can invalidate that.
"I think, therefore I am". I dont neccassarially believe in the traditional concept of a soul, but I do believe all people have something deeper. Something that cannot be explained with words.
Something that makes us human.
Even if even that is just a byproduct of horomones and neurons, it's still there. Even if every animal has it, or they can all think thoughts and feel feelings as deep as us, its still there.
We have Depth, and some people call that a soul, but I call that a wall (little orv reference there).
The meaning to life is too find meaning. When you find your meaning, use that to keep on living. But don't die until you've at least found it.
I understand that, and do not take offense. (to that last part)
The problem is, what is a 'good' action? No philosophy is perfect, and each one is loose and will disagree, regardless of religion.
Even religious people dont often use their morality compass imposed upon them by the bible.
The Bible has punishments like 'stone people' or 'make them eat their children' and I understand not believing it, but no matter who you are, you are picking and choosing what is right and wrong based on your own moral compass, religion or not.
The wall between good and evil is very blurry, and even if you believe in god, that line cannot and will not be defined.
Every person has their own moral compass that they stick to, and every person has to justify saying that their system of mortality is superior (or if you want to dig deeper, their belief is superior).