Jump to content

The Unknown Character

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4260

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by The Unknown Character

  1. The Unknown Character
    Exactly. Same with Seekers.
  2. The Unknown Character
    I'd believe it. And he seems like he's vil because he's a Smoker.
  3. The Unknown Character
  4. The Unknown Character
    As Mat mentioned earlier in the thread, it's a deviation from the current meta of low info kills, meaning killing low activity or low interaction players.
  5. The Unknown Character
    Perfectly neutral, as all things should be. On a serious note, I'm thinking V, because it didn't feel like there was much pushback against him, or even much elim activity in general. Which suggests the elims weren't in danger really.
  6. The Unknown Character
    @xinoehp512
  7. The Unknown Character
    I agree with literally the entire first paragraph, I'm not anti d1 vote; I'm anti voting with little to no reason. I know, this is so confusing despite never having actually played with/been gmed by/officially spectated by Wyrm.
  8. The Unknown Character
    The vast majority of d1 exes kill villagers, and by voting without evidence, I mean threadbare little to no reasoning. Basically all we have d1. Here's an metaphor that might explain my thought process. Would you rather turn in a test with an almost perfect score last, or turn in a test with a horrible score first, then take the test again and turn in a test with a slightly better score last? And that's the biggest thing, when it will happen regardless of me, why should I bother unless I'm confident in my opinion? To return to the previous metaphor, if I have a passing total grade regardless of if I turn in the test, why should I take it unless I'm confident I would only improve that score?
  9. The Unknown Character
    False, that is a flawed argument, why should I vote in a way that is likely if not almost certain to kill a villager? I have gone down this road before, but I would rather be right less often than be wrong with a higher chance of being right later. I don't refuse to vote d1, or d2, I refuse to vote without evidence (except jokingly obviously).
  10. The Unknown Character
    False, you should only do it if you a have a reasonable suspicion that someone is an elim. Hence why I rarely vote day one, and but when I do, it is more likely that they are an elim.
  11. The Unknown Character
    Any particular reason for that?
  12. The Unknown Character
    Mischievous and deceitful, chicanerous and deplorable.
  13. The Unknown Character
    Also, since this is a prequel and therefore before the breaking of the Tyrian Curse, aren't we pretty much doomed?
  14. The Unknown Character
    Meticulously meticulous reads formed with meticulously meticulous methods about meticulously selected and often meticulous players. Also known as Shining is crazy. Hence why they're "The Shining."
  15. The Unknown Character
    It is actually pretty normal, and is called a poke vote. It means someone will make a read (elim or village), which will determine the entire game I think.
  16. The Unknown Character
    (TUN)
  17. The Unknown Character
    Ah yes, blend in with the one person who posted, kill me now, I must be a rampant spiked murderer.
  18. The Unknown Character
    Second
  19. The Unknown Character
  20. The Unknown Character
  21. The Unknown Character
    "Can I go?"
  22. The Unknown Character
    "Professor?"
  23. The Unknown Character
    @Knight of Iron
  24. The Unknown Character
    Oppressive.
  25. The Unknown Character
    Yes. Almost as fun as whose.
×
×
  • Create New...