Jump to content

Quintessential

Members
  • Posts

    1691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Quintessential

  1. I... would love to know what the reasoning against me is? being voted for no reason is not fun, especially since I've died that way a couple of times in the recent past.
  2. I... okay can we please stop spreading the vote out for things that are literally not reasons?
  3. *rubs eyes* nobody has explained to me yet why it's a good idea to kill Striker. Last cycle there was a fair bit of agreement that Reading was mildly sus, so Liranil killed him. This cycle there appears to be, for some reason, a fair bit of agreement that Striker is mildly sus. Clearly a fair bit of agreement that someone is mildly sus is not a good reason to shoot them in the head, given that the last time we did that we lost a vil Yellow!
  4. Ash because I always kill Ash if I can Why are Striker and Breaker even in the pool? Striker, all we have is vague gut (which is the reason we killed Reading--that turned out sooo well) and Breaker... I thought we were reading him as vil?
  5. ...why? We know he's a Warder. If he's elim you won't be able to kill him, and if he's village the elims can target him too, which would take out Breaker's ability.
  6. Your scanning Burnt doesn't really prove anything, though. We're reasonably certain she's Brown because a) that's easy to disprove by having her scan a specific person and tell them what they are (I've already volunteered, as has Books) and b. her Warder has also confirmed that she's Brown. It'd be... quite an in-depth con for them to both be lying, with relatively low chances of success.
  7. Okay, well I've already asked you this once but if you don't think Dannex is the right kill then who is? I mean, you can obviously just not vote but you can't expect all of us to do that.
  8. sighhhh why is this game so chaotic... If you guys don't wanna vote Dannex, then don't vote him, but it's a really bad idea to totally ignore the main suspects of the cycle and vote based on light gut because it gives the elims an alternative to those main suspects--an easy out, a way to avoid weighing in on them. Edit: ninja'd by Ash, so this wasn't directed at you obviously XD
  9. Yes exactly thank you! First Lotus and now Striker. Not having a counter-train to Dannex would be concerning, yeah, but that doesn't mean we should just up and start one for no discernible reason!
  10. He's... posted like twice this cycle, right? That's about as inactive as you can get in this game. Anyway I meant "relative inactive." Someone who wasn't involved in the whole mess from last cycle. This just feels like deflecting suspicion and trying to focus on people who we really have nothing against. Edit: No can we please not do this again??? We always regret ties, every single time, and yet we keep doing them anyway! We can pursue suspicions of Striker and/or Matrim next cycle, but for now they're just distractions from the whole Dannex-Burnt-Lotus mess that's going on that we really should deal with first.
  11. Woah woah woah where did this come from??? Why are we last-minute switching to inactives AGAIN? that didn't exactly turn out great last cycle. Also it worries me that this keeps happening to protect Dannex. I'm feeling quite comfortable with my vote on him at this point.
  12. Not if they all end up being village! I mean if I were Green Ajah I'd have just not outed myself and secretly shot at someone every turn, because that sounds fun, but as a responsible non-vigilante I can't recommend that XD
  13. Archer... in Archer's first game they were elim and they spent the entire time dominating the thread with long posts iirc (I was in that game but I died C1 so I didn't pay too much attention to what happened after that). So yeah, I guess come to think of it Archer isn't necessarily village just because they seem to be trying to solve... since that's what they did their first game too... Yeah.
  14. I tried to tell her that... anyway, how about you Ash? Thoughts? Edit: @Liranil to be completely honest as the Green Ajah I would probably hold off killing anyone this cycle, until we have more information and can avoid shooting our protectors in the head but that's just me.
  15. : P right since I put this in an edit I suppose it serves me right, expecting people to see it: Edit: Also can I ask the confirmed roles (Dannex, Liranil, and now Burnt) to confirm who they're targeting tonight? If Burnt or Dannex wants to scan me, I'm fine with it--I have a fairly unimportant role, so my being outed likely isn't a problem. For some reason the Shard won't let me mention people? idk weird glitches but anyway we don't want this stuff to be decided way last minute 'cause that's just confusing and sometimes leads to things like village Yellow Ajahs dying. I'm not gonna tell you guys who to target 'cause you've got plenty of other people doing that for you, but please announce ahead of time? Preferably soon. I backed off. And then realized there were other reasons that didn't have to do with possible scumslips that it would be a good idea to vote Dannex off. So now I'm voting him again.
  16. Might be a better thing to worry about later, tbh. I don't think there's anything immediately concerning about Connie's survival, given how many ways there are for that to happen in this game. Probably better to focus on making sure that the exe isn't a tie this time around.
  17. I'm... pretty sure we have wayyy more than enough of that already. Also, unlike a lot of people in this game I am not a chaos demon, or at least not on purpose. Less chaos means my brand of logic works better XD Edit: Also can I ask the confirmed roles (Dannex, Liranil, and now Burnt) to confirm who they're targeting tonight? If Burnt or Dannex wants to scan me, I'm fine with it--I have a fairly unimportant role, so my being outed likely isn't a problem.
  18. You scanned Illwei? I... guess that makes sense : P though it mighttt not be the best idea to out any more people just yet. We're only on C2 after all.
  19. Ohhhh I am way too happy with that reference I love that scene so much Edit: @Illwei Okay, then according to you who is the right target?
  20. What's WIFOM? And yeah, this whole situation is a problem. Way to state the obvious we're less than two hours from rollover and the votes are spread out between... I think it's still five different people. Assuming the claims have all been true, which seems reasonable given how many scans there are in this game to disprove false claims, we have three PRs outed, two of whom don't have Warders and third of whom has an outed Warder with one life left. We've already killed one of our vil Protection roles. And nobody died to the exe last cycle, so we can't even analyze the votes. Pretty sure this is like, the definition of a problem. Question is, what do we do about it. In the interest of consolidating votes and because I legitimately don't know what else to do, Dannex.
×
×
  • Create New...