.png.6feeb5f54bbe3660d49500f91cd7a1ec.png)
dannnex
-
Posts
1915 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
13
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by dannnex
-
Burden of proof logical fallacy. You’re making the claim that I’m Elim, burden of proof falls on you. Also, Burnt. Because I doubt there’s another Brown, and I know I’m village, and I doubt both Browns are vil.
-
This is honestly suspicious, I’d probably vote myself for this, but I don’t think any of the other points hold water. Especially this one: I have never Elim-slipped, risky plans are NAI (also it wasn’t even ‘risky’), and ‘aggressiveness’ is basically subjective. But yeah, voting me for the weird survival push alone makes sense. I can’t even offer an explanation for why it keeps happening because I’m not really sure. I’ve never started any of those myself.
-
Well it’s not super obvious to me..... mind enlightening me?
-
Wait have you roleclaimed? What action are you talking about?
-
I don’t know what I should reveal about my scan. It’s not super relevant, not a huge reveal, but it might be important. I could reveal the result, or I could reveal the target. I don’t think I want to reveal both. Well, just revealing the result doesn’t actually tell the rest of you anything, so I’ll just say that I scanned James. I considered switching to Burnt but you all seemed to think that would be a waste so I didn’t.
-
I......I’m not dead?????????
-
A c’mon I was ninjad! ;-;
-
You just voted me, and under mildly suspicious circumstances. Sorry, but you’re on the list. also, guess we’re doing Quinn. Ash.
-
So when I flip village, y’all should 1. regret your life decisions 2. say sorry 3. put suspicion on Archer, Burnt, Ash, and maybe Breaker or Quinn. everyone got that? That’s the C3 checklist, memorize it.
-
Ikr let it be known that I tried insanely hard to stop y’all from killing a valuable asset (me). I don’t wanna be up in the great dead doc in the sky and see any of y’all throwing shade on me like “well he shouldn’t’ve been acting so sus then”.
-
Sigh well, @Matrim's Dice @Illwei and @James Brafin we seem to be the only ones not voting me, so we should all vote together if we want our votes to mean anything. Who do you think?
-
Archer. Quinn. Just because I’m feeling a bit Chaotic today. And I want friends in the dead doc. Also I’m Vil, so tying a me-shrek isn’t a horrible idea. Ideally I’d tie it with archer, but this works too.
-
Archer is not village seeming at all, at least to me. They are playing exactly the way I did last game when I was Elim. Being online and viewing the thread but not talking, posting only one or two times a cycle, but make those posts big so it looks like you’re contributing, didn’t ever respond directly to my counter arguments, archer is my hardest Elim read.
-
I vote for either a Striker, Burnt (if you don’t shrek me), or Archer Green Kill. When I flip Vil, y’all should put suspicion on Burnt and/or Lotus. I doubt both browns are vil.
-
She’s viewing the thread tho......
-
Wait burnt is online. BURNT WHO ARE YOU SCANNING.
-
Well if burnt isn’t online to say who they scan this cycle...
-
Matrim no thats a horrible plan Remove both browns in one shrek no we could tie me with someone actually suspicious, like striker or archer.
-
Well this is interesting then. Maybe you should all just shelve your me-suspicions, let me scan burnt this cycle, and then reconvene?
-
Sighhhhh Actually I’m not super opposed to a me shrek now. Because of the reveal that there’s another brown, I very much doubt the other one is the same alignment as me. So when I flip Vil, Lotus, you have to out your bondmate, they are almost certainly an Elim. If lotus doesn’t talk, then lotus is also an Elim. So this is actually a very useful info kill. Maybe we should force a tie, so we have one shrek for info (me) and one shrek for suspicions (idk striker maybe).
-
I kinda think Kal....doesn’t make it to the back 5. His arc seems like it’s wrapping up. Kal’s character arc throughout these books has been defined by his Radiant Oaths. The moments where he says his oaths are like the points on a graph that define a line. Except he’s running out of oaths. There’s only 5. I think Kal will say his fifth oath in SA 5, his arc will end, and he will die. At the very very least, I think he’ll be removed. I doubt we’ll see him much in the back five if he survives.
-
I’m just gonna toss a vote on Archer for the same reason I tossed a vote on gears earlier. Archer has been online recently, but hasn’t replied to any of my defenses, or anything at all actually.
-
It should also be noted that all of that is irrelevant now anyway, since we realized that Greys target a vote for removal, not a player to remove a vote on. And since votes were flying around in complete madness, even up to the last possible second, it’s likely just a coincidence that they both ended up on me.
-
And this is the third time I’m explaining it. Here, I’ll just rewrite that entire paragraph.
-
That? That’s not me saying Lotus is vil, that’s just me being glad they didn’t die for no reason at all. Because that push literally had no basis. I was glad they didn’t die randomly with no evidence like Reading did. I hadn’t analyzed Lotus at all, and I was feeling guilty for using them as a means to an end. So I was glad that I had an opportunity to actually get a read on them. And now I have, and that read is null-elim.
