MacThorstenson

Actually wait, can every one please say what hours they are most available to talk about this stuff? Mine is about 700 am to 1000 pm est.

I don't know about other guilds, the DA just gets whatever they want. But the GB has a store and each member gets an allowance and commission from contracts they complete. Maybe have no limit on the funds that a guild can produce, but have a rule that members cant use their own guild coin. DA can make coins and give it to their members, GBs the same, they have to acquire it from other guilds. This will be my last post today. Sorry guys, I need to get up in 6 hours. Also, I say no to fractured guilds,.

That is the rule. Please vote yes or no. We need a majority though preferably unanimous vote to decide on this. Yes.

what about a waiting period between lives? yea or nay

Sorry, I forgot to explain that in the previous post, one revival is assumed and guaranteed (this could be subject to change, I rather like the Idea of having one extra chance, because it provides value to the one life that you do have), the next ones have to be earned.

The Gods of the Meta role play (The guild of mediators) are mercy-full and allow hero's to have another chance, if they deem them worthy. Basically, you can request another revival and based on what the Guild decides, most likely the unbiased ones because this has he most possibility for abuse (Favor gathering), you could be revived, with your current character and everything.

Maybe you have one extra life instead. its possible to have unlimited revivals, but need to be awarded.

I think that what ever system we choose, has to not fall into stagnation. I am in favor of a system with more consequences because people have a way to win. They can hope that they can beat the big man. The DA stopped being as active because we were too OP. Hemalurgy is too OP, by allowing that and not any of the consequences, we destroyed everyone, and they stopped fighting b/c they had no chance to win. EDIT: Ninja'd again.

Now we move onto an interesting topic, consequences of death. Do we want to operate with a ROTMG (its a video game) system? Where you have one account, and on that account you can make a character, who will die permanently, and you will have to make a new character? I think that this system has the potential to increase the dynamism of the sub forum EDIT: Ninjad

No, attack could happen anywhere in the social groups section, but if one tries to attack in the guild HQ, members of that guild would be able to preemptively fight back.

Guild thread. The thread: People you wouldn't want to meet blah blah blah... is the HQ of the DA. The GB thread is the HQ of the GB's

@Kidpen I think its better because It allows the person to have a reasonable chance to avoid/recruit help. My only having things happen in PM's it removes a sense of publicity that assassinations usually would have. I also think that it would be alright if Assassins PM'ed the target, saying that they snuck into their house while they were asleep, but they would understand that if they started to make noise, after attacking someone, inside of a guild HQ, people would come running. The element that I don't want to lose, is the fact that assassinations don't take place in a vacuum. If you stab someone in a public place, then they will fight back. people will take sides. By moving everything into PM, that element is lost. and by doing so, assassinating becomes way too OP.

I like that. Though I would still like to be able to implement some sort of security feature if you are in your home base. If I was in a DA, and a fellow come in that I didn't want him there, because I either expect him to be an assassin or something, I would like to be able to preemptively fight back

I think that assassinations can be public and spontaneous. Otherwise there is no point to training secrecy/stealth. In addition, it will allow mediators to interfere if things get out of hand. finally, it will allow people to have normal PM's. If every time someone is killed, they die after being added into a groupchat with a GB and a Mediator, people will just stop responding to those. Attacks (spontaneous and unplanned fights) should be illegal. In public chats. If someone posts in your groups thread, while you are having a conversation, you are allowed to attempt to kill them using RP, even if they haven't done anything except be there. They have to specifically request a flag of peace.

These basic rules should only govern inter-guild interaction. Nothing revolving around what happens inside of guilds. This can be broken down into smaller questions Combat (interpersonal or guild) (Assassination (Ambushing with the intent to kill) vs duel (Prearranged fight) vs attack (Spontaneous fight.)) Death

Soooooooooooooooo... what should we tackle?

It appears that we will have a net loss of one rep in two hours. Shall we begin?

Wait, so you're saying you don't trust the man who swore to destroy your guild and everything it stands for in a hail of hemalurgic spikes? Now your just being unreasonable. </sarcasm> In reality, I can understand why you would think that. I also think that having many unbiased is a good idea. I was hoping to get three people to try to sign on, but I'm concerned with the amount of activity this forum has, and the amount of people that are willing to leave the guilds. I will also be gone in two hours.

@Archer I do have a question, this is something that can be done without nohadon, is there any way that I could get you to trust me being an Unbiased One?

In the past, they have been on at similar times to us. Maybe to day will be good as well?

I think that waiting for @Archer and @Nohadon would be best. Having a rep from each of the guilds appears to be the best for deciding what happens.

Its good, and I like it. I think that there is a lot of potential there.

right now everything is in a state of limbo. I would suggest waiting until there is a clear set of rules, before creating much more RP.

You would have to wait a little before creating a new character. I guess it depends on how meta we want to keep this. we could create a whole intro thread, with signups, and character sheets. Or we could keep this meta, and have your shard character be linked to your account.

We are currently discussing the consequences of death on another thread. This competition could also be until someone yields.