Jump to content

Clanky

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1090

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Clanky

  1. Clanky
    Sorry Ripple, I forgot about your vote this cycle. Still it is only a poke vote and doesn't really affect any of my reasonings for my suspicion. Also you should know that of the three I said, you are the least suspicious. I have reasonings for Winter/Zeph but for you it is mostly circumstantial evidence and you just seem like you fit with the other two.
  2. Clanky
    Granted, you can only use internet explorer to access your Mindnet I wish that nobody ever shares the fate that you just bestowed upon Mr. Mistborn
  3. Clanky
    I know that you haven't played a lot and that can explain some of the things you said. That is why I didn't pursue you any further with only the original reasoning of posts without content that seem to be just attempting to look like an inquisitor. However you have said several other things that are Skaa-like or just plain wrong. I do tend to give newer players a benefit of the doubt at the beginning of the game but we are far enough along into this game for that to be long gone. Do you want me to do further analysis for your guilt? I could look at your voting history. I see a vote on Kas early on that didn't even get close to threatening a lynch and a vote for Creccio that you removed before the end of the cycle. Thanks for the informative response. I see that beyond the "I'm new" excuse you used the same reasoning that Winter did. I don't want you to just come out and say your skaa btw. I get way more info from you continuing to defend yourself. On another note I do not share the same convictions about Alfa that Death does. I think that the members of the eliminator team are: Zephrer: I have given my reasoning several times Winter: I have also given several reasons for this and a new one in which Zeph uses an eerily similar defense to Winters. Kasrippimar: Kas dropped out because he was too busy. Which I totally understand and he gave good reasons for. However I do find it more likely that he would drop out if he were an eliminator since it usually requires more time and effort(as Winter pointed out as a reason for Wyrms innocence) Also Zephrers one non-threatening vote which stands as his only vote to date was on Kas. I.e vote for your teammates when they aren't in danger idea. Since Ripple has replaced Kas she has made one vote on Stink because he was being rude and hasn't voiced any hard suspicions. Now as I said earlier about the Skaa potentially staying out of the way and letting the inquisitors kill themselves, this seems to be what they are doing. It seems to be a concerted effort to stay on the fringe of the debates and not put down any hard suspicions on anyone. EDIT: I would also like to point out that Lopen and Shallan both also fit the bill of staying to the outsides.
  4. Clanky
    Ok, coinshot if you are an inquisitor please kill Zephrer if it is Alfa who is lynched and not Zeph that is. So Death is covering for a Skaa coinshot who killed two of his teammates? So I guess you can't vote for anyone then since we have no seeker.
  5. Clanky
    Inactivity isn't the only possibility for no Skaa kill. It could have just been miscommunication of who was supposed to send in the kill order (unlikely but possible) or it could also have been someone was designated to send in the kill order but they forgot/something came up. I think one of these two options is more likely than the whole Skaa team just didn't even try to kill anyone.
  6. Clanky
    So last cycle we had 16 people left and only 5 votes. This left us with a tie vote and not much new info to go on. This cycle we still have only five people voting I think. At this point in the game there is no reason not to be voting! If you don't have any suspicions by now I don't really know what to say to you. What I do know is that we can't rely on the Coinshot who may not even be an inquisitor to kill all the Skaa for us. So vote! You have 14 hours left today and I want to see at least 10 votes here by the end of this cycle!
  7. Clanky
    I would probably play every game still, even though it would probably end in my failing out of school and living on the street within the year...
  8. Clanky
    Granted, you spend the rest of your life trapped in the rookery. I wish to be stick
  9. Clanky
    Seems like a lot of players with no roles. I was also without a role but I was almost expecting this game to be close to role madness. Anyways congratulations Traitors I think this has to be a record for quickest SE ever. I had completely forgotten about the lynch the captain win condition.
  10. Clanky
    Ok Winter the vote is gone (for now). It is a different case than the Ripple effect (it is a good name) but it does share some similarities I suppose. Zephrer, I'm back to you. It would be very poor strategy for Deathclutch to claim to be the coinshot who killed the Skaa if he wasn't. What does he gain other than maybe finding out the identity of a coinshot who is probably out of metal anyways? He would be guaranteed to die if he was lying no matter how he goes about it. Explain to me how death could be working with a coinshot in a game with no PMs. Maybe you didn't think of that because you have been collaborating with people all game? I realize that this may fit into the Ripple Effect but I still think slip-ups like this can be for analysis purposes. I have noticed that you have been expressing doubt of deaths innocence for a while now but I fail to see a single time you voted for him. Now I think this is because as a Skaa you know he is innocent. So you want to get him lynched without being the one who places the first vote. That way you can have plausible deniability when we find out he was telling the truth about everything.
  11. Clanky
    That is a bit different from Ripples typo. This is more of a "Eliminators wouldn't act certain of stuff like this so this would make me less suspicious". I did read your posts but when you don't say anything about my main suspicion about you then they aren't really going to change my opinion.
  12. Clanky
    @Winter, What changed your mind from this point to this point? You went from "I'm only voting for Orlok so that someone is lynched" to "I was certain Orlok was guilty". Between those two posts we had approximately zero posts from Orlok. So I don't see any rational explanation for the change of heart.
  13. Clanky
    We also can't be sure that the new coinshot even is an inquisitor. Perhaps the Skaa got a coinshot with only one or two shots and they were waiting for good targets to use it on. I would like to hear some more reasons from Death as to why Badger is a Skaa. Until I get that I will be placing my vote on Winter. I never got any good reasoning to make me rethink my vote from last cycle. EDIT: Vote recolouring
  14. Clanky
    Generically only really old yankees are learning science. GOMETS
  15. Clanky
    Ninjaing is when somebody posts right before you and it often affects what you would say in your post or says the exact same thing you did.
  16. Clanky
    But it's only Loyal hemalurgists that keep the HI in line. Any traitorous hemalurgists wouldn't stop the HI from changing sides. EDIT: There are ninja's everywhere!!!
  17. Clanky
    I realized that which was one of the reasons I realized it was a poor idea. No problem I'm here to help! Unless you are a traitor, then I am here to kill you.
  18. Clanky
    I believe that was just a case of getting roles confused. I believe she meant this: guess I don't see anything wrong with the roleless/weaker people telling the HI who they are, since then he could let the Forgers know and they could give them a better role and the HI wouldn't know what the new role was (right?).
  19. Clanky
    You can PM the GM at anytime. It doesn't count as a regular PM. Also it's the Forger not the Hemalurgists that change a players role.
  20. Clanky
    Except the HI has the ability to check peoples roles. They can check that a players role which will make people less likely to try and lie about a role to them. Also I said that the plan was a bad one. I know that it will not work I was just saying what I had been thinking before realizing it won't work. Also Queensteph instead of posting twice in a row you can use the Edit button on the bottom of your first post.
  21. Clanky
    I was thinking more along the lines of people who don't have the most important roles or who are roleless could reveal this to the HI. Then if a forger needed a target to forge a new Hemalurgist or something like that then they could ask the HI for a target. This would only work while we are sure that Araris is still on our side but It could stop forgers from forging over Hemalurgists or Elantrians. The more I think about it the more I find this actually to be not a very good plan. I am just worried about losing important roles to forgers or forgers being too wary of this which allows the traitors forger(if they have one) to give all the good roles to fellow traitors.
  22. Clanky
    That is a possibility. Perhaps if we wait to see how many hemalurgists contact Araris first. If there are only one or 2 then yes we should worry about that but if we have 3 then I think we can take that risk as we will have time to forge new ones before they all die. I agree that the eliminators won't have a Mistborn but I definitely wouldn't be surprised if they had a Forger. This would potentially allow them to have one in the future.
  23. Clanky
    I agree that Araris should be trusted and I;m not really sure why there was ever an argument about it. He is on our team. That should have been the end of discussion. He isn't like Survival in LG14. He can't just pick and choose sides. I am leaning more towards telling him everything. If he can direct the forgers then we don't have to worry about them forging any important roles away. Also the more he knows the more likely we can win without ARaris ever turning in the first place. @Badger, We don't really need to discuss day 1 lynches. It has been discussed time and time again. I much prefer to discuss who we should be lynching day 1. I will start with Orlok. He started the whole "Don't trust the HI" bit and then just left to let others continue his argument. EDIT: @Araris, nobody can contact you yet since PMs are only allowed at night.
  24. Clanky
    You have to sign up a long time ahead of GMing right? So didn't Wyrm know he would be GMing the next LG before even signing up for this game?
  25. Clanky
    Sorry for leaving you hanging there. Had school in a few hours and decided I should probably sleep at least a little. Now for my opinion on you. I started off when you became active again thinking that you were good. Then I realized that this post here was basically just rehashing my suspicions so I thought you may be trying to gain my trust through that. Also your recent defence of me from Kipper reinforces that this may be the case. This doesn't mean that I don't appreciate it but anytime someone defends me without reason to trust me 100% I worry about that. Other than that you have been good about promoting discussion and have been very open with your suspicions. This makes me want to trust you even though I disagree with some of your suspicions and methods (mostly how you are using who played in previous games). Also you had Lopen as the most suspicious person in the game in your will before his death which is a (small) point in your favour. So if I had to guess which side you are on I am leaning inquisitor, but that doesn't mean that I am not watching you very carefully
×
×
  • Create New...