Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

Not the dutiful Fafen.

Lol, alright:

1. This character knows a king.

2. This character knows 2 kings.

Siri

There are also a surprisingly large number of people who know two kings… Most of Bridge 4, anyone who knows the Lopen + one other king, anyone who knows Warbreaker + another king, anyone who knows Hoid + another king (I’m pretty sure he mentioned being a king once), any one who knows any combination of Elend, Spook, Sazed, or Kelsier, anyone who knew some combination of Raoden, Iadon, and Kiin, and so on. The Cosmere has a LOT of kings.

Edited by Kingsdaughter613
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Kingsdaughter613 said:

Siri

There are also a surprisingly large number of people who know two kings… Most of Bridge 4, anyone who knows the Lopen + one other king, anyone who knows Warbreaker + another king, anyone who knows Hoid + another king (I’m pretty sure he mentioned being a king once), any one who knows any combination of Elend, Spook, Sazed, or Kelsier, anyone who knew some combination of Raoden, Iadon, and Kiin, and so on. The Cosmere has a LOT of kings.

Not the unwavering Siri

Lol, I love the Lopen point, fair :D I will say the kings are specifically kings in name and not emperors, presidents, primes, etc.

1. This character knows a king.

2. This character knows 2 kings

3. This character was a ruler themselves.

Edited by AceBassMan
Posted
3 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

Not the unwavering Siri

Lol, I love the Lopen point, fair :D I will say the kings are specifically kings in name and not emperors, presidents, primes, etc.

1. This character knows a king.

2. This character knows 2 kings

3. This character was a ruler themselves.

Dalinar.

Posted
25 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

Not the unwavering Siri

Lol, I love the Lopen point, fair :D I will say the kings are specifically kings in name and not emperors, presidents, primes, etc.

1. This character knows a king.

2. This character knows 2 kings

3. This character was a ruler themselves.

The Lopen. For one day.

More seriously: Elhokar.

Posted
1 hour ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Dalinar.

Not the dour Dalinar.

55 minutes ago, Kingsdaughter613 said:

The Lopen. For one day.

More seriously: Elhokar.

Not the willful Lopen or the harsh Elhokar.

1. This character knows a king.

2. This character knows 2 kings

3. This character was a ruler themselves

4. This character is in charge of a different organization now.

 

Posted
7 hours ago, AceBassMan said:

Not the dour Dalinar.

Not the willful Lopen or the harsh Elhokar.

1. This character knows a king.

2. This character knows 2 kings

3. This character was a ruler themselves

4. This character is in charge of a different organization now.

 

Doddery old Taravangian?

Posted
7 hours ago, AceBassMan said:

Not the dour Dalinar.

Not the willful Lopen or the harsh Elhokar.

1. This character knows a king.

2. This character knows 2 kings

3. This character was a ruler themselves

4. This character is in charge of a different organization now.

Raoden?

Posted
3 hours ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Doddery old Taravangian?

Not the doddery old Vargo Taravangian

3 hours ago, Honorless said:

Raoden?

Not the peace-loving Raoden

1. This character knows a king.

2. This character knows 2 kings

3. This character was a ruler themselves

4. This character is in charge of a different organization now.

5. This character is the law.

Posted
2 hours ago, AceBassMan said:

Not the doddery old Vargo Taravangian

Not the peace-loving Raoden

1. This character knows a king.

2. This character knows 2 kings

3. This character was a ruler themselves

4. This character is in charge of a different organization now.

5. This character is the law.

That must surely be a trap. Nale's only ever been in charge of one organisation, as far as we've seen.

So: Kalak.

Posted
59 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

That must surely be a trap. Nale's only ever been in charge of one organisation, as far as we've seen.

So: Kalak.

Not the cracking Kalak. But I'm going to count this as a guess for Nale too, which the character most certainly is and wasn't a trap :D

RoW

Spoiler

Dalinar's connection flashback with Nale, showing Nale as a warlord or leader of another force that Jezrien makes a deal with. At least this is how I interpreted, it's possible he was just a dissident voice and not a leader. But it was Nin, so the turn is yours!

 

Posted
50 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

Not the cracking Kalak. But I'm going to count this as a guess for Nale too, which the character most certainly is and wasn't a trap :D

RoW

  Reveal hidden contents

Dalinar's connection flashback with Nale, showing Nale as a warlord or leader of another force that Jezrien makes a deal with. At least this is how I interpreted, it's possible he was just a dissident voice and not a leader. But it was Nin, so the turn is yours!

 

Aha! Very good point. Probably a leader, but perhaps not a ruler?

Either way:

  1. This character has had more than one bond.
Posted
22 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Aha! Very good point. Probably a leader, but perhaps not a ruler?

Either way:

  1. This character has had more than one bond.

Sylphrena?

Posted
5 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

  1. This character has had more than one bond.
  2. This character is judicious and selective.

Nale again?

Posted
1 hour ago, Honorless said:

Nale again?

That would be cheeky. I wouldn't do that. Not Nale.
Not Sylphrena.

  1. This character has had more than one bond.
  2. This character is judicious and selective.
  3. This character dies in battle.
Posted
19 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

That would be cheeky. I wouldn't do that. Not Nale.
Not Sylphrena.

  1. This character has had more than one bond.
  2. This character is judicious and selective.
  3. This character dies in battle.

Szeth?

Posted
1 hour ago, AceBassMan said:

Szeth?

Not Szeth.
Not Nale.
Not Sylphrena.

  1. This character has had more than one bond.
  2. This character is judicious and selective.
  3. This character dies in battle.
  4. This character is relatively small, but also relatively big.
Posted
11 hours ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Not Szeth.
Not Nale.
Not Sylphrena.

  1. This character has had more than one bond.
  2. This character is judicious and selective.
  3. This character dies in battle.
  4. This character is relatively small, but also relatively big.

Phendorana? 

Posted
1 hour ago, Marukka said:

Phendorana? 

Not Phendorana.
Not Szeth.
Not Nale.
Not Sylphrena.

  1. This character has had more than one bond.
  2. This character is judicious and selective.
  3. This character dies in battle.
  4. This character is relatively small, but also relatively big.
  5. This character is extremely valuable and versatile on the battlefield, and useful and empathetic off.
Posted
26 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Not Phendorana.
Not Szeth.
Not Nale.
Not Sylphrena.

  1. This character has had more than one bond.
  2. This character is judicious and selective.
  3. This character dies in battle.
  4. This character is relatively small, but also relatively big.
  5. This character is extremely valuable and versatile on the battlefield, and useful and empathetic off.

Sureblood?

Posted
9 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Correct!

Yay for me, always getting the ones with the War Goats! :D Hmmm... guess it takes one to know one... :wacko:

1. This character is an orphan.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...