Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
32 minutes ago, CallsignZen said:

alendi

Not the optimistic Alendi

30 minutes ago, Bejardin1250 said:

Kwaan (he’s a fuerichemist)

Not the eidetic Kwaan

 1.This character is Scadrian.

2. This character is never seen directly.

3. This character is not a known allomancer. 

4. This character has interacted with Waxilium Ladrian.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, AceBassMan said:

Not the optimistic Alendi

Not the eidetic Kwaan

 1.This character is Scadrian.

2. This character is never seen directly.

3. This character is not a known allomancer. 

4. This character has interacted with Waxilium Ladrian.

 

The guy Wayne leaves in charge when he goes to find Wax. Starts with a B, I think.

Posted
8 hours ago, Kingsdaughter613 said:

The guy Wayne leaves in charge when he goes to find Wax. Starts with a B, I think.

I forget exactly who he leaves in charge in the roughs and I don't have the book around to check, but not that character ;)

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, AceBassMan said:

I forget exactly who he leaves in charge in the roughs and I don't have the book around to check, but not that character ;)

Then the third named Lawman. The one who isn’t Miles or Wax.

Edited by Kingsdaughter613
Posted
10 hours ago, Kingsdaughter613 said:

The guy Wayne leaves in charge when he goes to find Wax. Starts with a B, I think.

Wayne left Barl in charge

Posted
14 minutes ago, Kingsdaughter613 said:

Then the third named Lawman. The one who isn’t Miles or Wax.

John Deadfinger? Its not him.

9 minutes ago, Chinkoln said:

Wayne left Barl in charge

That was his name! Not Barl

 1.This character is Scadrian.

2. This character is never seen directly.

3. This character is not a known allomancer. 

4. This character has interacted with Waxilium Ladrian.
5. This character has an animal name.
Posted
38 minutes ago, Kingsdaughter613 said:

Sebariel 

 

36 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

Vstim?

 

33 minutes ago, CallsignZen said:

miraze 

No, no, and no. These fine gentlemen are not this character.

Posted
Just now, Bejardin1250 said:

Tonk fah 

It is not the deceptive Tonk Fah.

  1. This character has merchant contacts.
  2. This character has been punished for killing.
  3. This character bears visible evidence of their punishment.
Posted
3 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

Kaladin?

It is not the yo-yo that is Kaladin Stormblessed.

  1. This character has merchant contacts.
  2. This character has been punished for killing.
  3. This character bears visible evidence of their punishment.
  4. This character was thought to be unkillable.
Posted
5 minutes ago, Bejardin1250 said:

Rashek?

It is not stern Rashek.

I've reconsidered Clue #4 and it's a bit unfair, so #5 ought to narrow it down.

  1. This character has merchant contacts.
  2. This character has been punished for killing.
  3. This character bears visible evidence of their punishment.
  4. This character was thought to be unkillable.
  5. This character was discovered alone on an island.
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Bejardin1250 said:

Is this Dawnshard?

I haven’t read it

Stick?

Alas, no. Stick remains stick. It is (RoW Spoiler):
 

Spoiler

Testament

But I think you should go next for that excellent answer.

Edited by ElMonoEstupendo

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...