This has been a contentious topic between myself and my coworkers, and I've made an account just to ask this question.
For context, the Coppermind tells us
Quote
When a Shard Invests a world, it will begin to fuel the local magic system. Each Shard can do this differently, though much of the system is dictated by the planet itself.
And
Quote
While not all magic systems in the cosmere are directly tied to a Shard, Shardic presence greatly influences the shape a magic system takes. On a planet inhabited by a Shard, magic forms as a result of the interactions between a Shard's power, Realmatics, the world's natural inclinations and, in some cases, even genetics.
This seems to indicate to me that, had the Shards we know decided to Invest in different systems, we would still end up with very similar expressions of Investiture on each planet, with differences lying more in how the Investiture is accessed. I might not be using the best vernacular here, so let me use an example to try to explain.
In my head, the above tells me that, had Ruin and Preservation decided to Invest on Nalthis, instead of Scadrial, Preservation would have begun fueling Awakening. The way to preform an Awakening would likely change, for instance, Breaths might never come into it, they may still have used Metals to fuel Awakening, or some other way. But the end result would be something basically like Awakening, and not the Metallic Arts. Likewise, if Endowment had Invested in Scadrial, then the Metallic Arts would have been fueled by them, and we'd see some other manifestation of how to power that.
The other side of this argument is that the Shards have a LOT of influence over the use of Investiture on their Invested Systems, however, this seems to contradict the "much of the system is dictated by the planet itself" line.
So, the question becomes: Which is it? Do they have a large influence, or a not so large one?
Question
listerfeend
This has been a contentious topic between myself and my coworkers, and I've made an account just to ask this question.
For context, the Coppermind tells us
And
This seems to indicate to me that, had the Shards we know decided to Invest in different systems, we would still end up with very similar expressions of Investiture on each planet, with differences lying more in how the Investiture is accessed. I might not be using the best vernacular here, so let me use an example to try to explain.
In my head, the above tells me that, had Ruin and Preservation decided to Invest on Nalthis, instead of Scadrial, Preservation would have begun fueling Awakening. The way to preform an Awakening would likely change, for instance, Breaths might never come into it, they may still have used Metals to fuel Awakening, or some other way. But the end result would be something basically like Awakening, and not the Metallic Arts. Likewise, if Endowment had Invested in Scadrial, then the Metallic Arts would have been fueled by them, and we'd see some other manifestation of how to power that.
The other side of this argument is that the Shards have a LOT of influence over the use of Investiture on their Invested Systems, however, this seems to contradict the "much of the system is dictated by the planet itself" line.
So, the question becomes: Which is it? Do they have a large influence, or a not so large one?
Link to comment
Share on other sites
6 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.