Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom discussion

[Enter a username]

For anyone unaware: 

Commence discussions.

[The Wandering Wizard he/him]

The skeletons could be revived, it has happened often enough in zelda games.

[Channelknight Fadran]

Trailer gud.

[The Wandering Wizard he/him]

6 hours ago, Channelknight Fadran said:

Trailer gud.

How many times have you watched it?

[The Bookwyrm he/him]

What's with the flying bird thing....

Also, a recurring theme in each trailer seems to be reverse-motion. A new ability to use...

[Going_North_cal]

we're forgetting all the stuff from the original trailer... zelda and link in the catacombs beneath the castle, finding the corpse of Ganondorf and all the malice.

also elephants.

elephants pog.

[The Bookwyrm he/him]

6 minutes ago, CalanoCorvus said:

we're forgetting all the stuff from the original trailer... zelda and link in the catacombs beneath the castle, finding the corpse of Ganondorf and all the malice.

also elephants.

elephants pog.

Are we sure it was Ganondorf?

There was also the weird hand with all the runes. The hand that, I should point out, is probably Link's now.

[Going_North_cal]

1 minute ago, The Bookwyrm said:

Are we sure it was Ganondorf?

 

he had the Ganon eyes.... and the yellow forehead crystal. those all suggest it was ganondorf *shrug*

[The Wandering Wizard he/him]

5 minutes ago, CalanoCorvus said:

he had the Ganon eyes.... and the yellow forehead crystal. those all suggest it was ganondorf *shrug*

It very much looked like Ganondorf from Twilight Princess.

[Channelknight Fadran]

There is literally nothing that suggests that the creepy mummy man is not Ganondorf

[Going_North_cal]

Exactly!

[That1Cellist he/him]

On 9/15/2022 at 10:16 AM, Channelknight Fadran said:

There is literally nothing that suggests that the creepy mummy man is not Ganondorf

That's a fallacy by the way, I think.

[NameIess]

Just now, That1Cellist said:

That's a fallacy by the way, I think.

When there is evidence for something and no evidence against it, that's not a fallacy. It would be a fallacy if there was no evidence either way.

[That1Cellist he/him]

Just now, Nameless said:

When there is evidence for something and no evidence against it, that's not a fallacy. It would be a fallacy if there was no evidence either way.

Yeah, you're right. I have unfortunately led myself down the path of stupidity. 

[Rabbit Unmade she/her]

Don’t forget the hair. Gerudo hair, remember.