Jump to content

Araris Valerian

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4721

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Araris Valerian

  1. Araris Valerian
    I'm curious, @DroughtBringer, were you being honest with me in our PM the cycle before you died? Because your PM with Dalinar had all of us convinced that you were lying to us and fishing for information when you told him to target me with a kill. And I guess the Forest elims didn't hit Dalinar the last night. That's the only way the game would have kept going.
  2. Araris Valerian
    Thanks for running this! Overall I think this game was done very well. My largest complain was the lack of GM provided player lists each cycle, which was somewhat inconvenient. I am interested in hearing what happened the last night, since I thought the game would go for one more cycle.
  3. Araris Valerian
    @Aonar Faileas is the game actually over?
  4. Araris Valerian
    Except that I'm not court anymore. I'm probably going to die during the Night if I don't get lynched now. It's a waste of your vote to put it one me since I'll die anyways.
  5. Araris Valerian
    @The_Lady_of_Chaos I'm not an eliminator, so it doesn't help you to vote on me.
  6. Araris Valerian
    My alignment is in no way related to the Zeta Realm, so no Whitelegs.
  7. Araris Valerian
    Well, I'm still somewhat attached to them, since we worked together the whole game. My new win condition is technically compatible with theirs still. But I am not Court anymore.
  8. Araris Valerian
    Guys, I'm seriously not an eliminator. You know the rest of my team, vote for one of them please.
  9. Araris Valerian
    Orlok. Cloudjumper. I'd also like to mention that I'm actually not an eliminator anymore, by the way. Kinda stinks, because I'm pretty sure that we would have gotten the tie.
  10. Araris Valerian
    Majestic, you should probably take the Test tonight. Maybe you too, DA.
  11. Araris Valerian
    Spaghetti is in the other thread, actually.
  12. Araris Valerian
    We could make a neutral role next cycle with the Medium vote. Edit: @DroughtBringer are you able to take the Test? I would like to know your win condition, but if you can't get it then the Test would probably help with that.
  13. Araris Valerian
    @Burnt Spaghetti @Drake Marshall Don't give up. We have the upper hand over here as well.
  14. Araris Valerian
    @A Joe in the Bush Does Elbereth get a second extra life? I don't know if it matters, but if it does then it would be nice to know.
  15. Araris Valerian
    @Eternum That was kind of the point
  16. Araris Valerian
    @DroughtBringer What is your win con?
  17. Araris Valerian
    I think both Eternum and DA are elims. The attack on DA was a WGG, so that the elim team could do a triple kill tonight, with their team kill, Ysengir kill, and Protector kill.
  18. Araris Valerian
    My own player list: Active: 1. Eternum 2. Darkness Ascendant 3. Araris 4. Dalinar 5. Hemalurgic Headshot Semiactive: 6. Cloudjumper 7. Majestic 8. Doc12 Inactive: 9. Lady of Chaos 10. Polkinghornbd
  19. Araris Valerian
    @A Joe in the Bush Could we get a player list? Edit: @Dalinar Kholin, we know of two kills, Eternum's kill as Ysengir, and the elim kill. Eternum can clear up which is which, although I doubt he attacked his newly appointed Protector. That means that the elims probably targeted DA, which doesn't make too much sense to me. I mean, he has an extra life, and has a win con of protecting the Medium. That's two good reasons for the elims to not target him. So there isn't really any reason for the elims to attack DA that I can see, except for a WGG. But at the rate we're going, a WGG isn't really a necessary thing for the elims to do.
  20. Araris Valerian
    Eternum, since Stick died, do you still get to make a Protector?
  21. Araris Valerian
    Well, he wasn't an eliminator. I suppose for analysis purposes, we should treat this as a mislynch, although I'm going to bed now, so said analysis will have to wait.
  22. Araris Valerian
    Eternum could be an elim. That is a possibility, but again, we can sort things out if an elim becomes Medium (or I hope we can, at least). However, it doen't really make sense for the elims to be given a second kill role in such a small game, or for said killl role to reveal themselves. Yeah, it gets some trust, but it limits the use of that kill. As far as PMs go, I don't really like them most of the time. I find that PMs lead to lots of role claiming and elim scheming. While private village communication can be nice, I don't have any need to communicate privately this game, so there isn't too much point in responding to PMs. Lynching an inactive during a meeting is different. A vote on an inactive player is easy to get behind. I'd bet we could get 8-10 votes on the same person if we tried to do that. That's a lot more powerful than having the scattered votes that we have this cycle, considering that we need a larger pile of votes than the Court to actually lynch somebody. However, we don't get any information from that sort of lynch. The issue of killing inactives has been discussed in many LGs that I've been a part of. Usually the best plan is use a kill role on them, if @name doesn't work to get them involved. But the lynch is too valuable of a tool to waste on inactives unless everyone else has been cleared somehow.
  23. Araris Valerian
    But that doesn't work... If DA is an elim, and become Medium, we can use his knowledge of the win-con to discover his alignment. He gets lynched the next cycle, which makes the protector lose their powers. Then we lynch the protector the following cycle (if they sent in a kill). So the elims lose around 1/2 of their team, and get 1 extra kill. That doesn't seem in any way worth it to me. I guess the protector could take the test, but that would just cause them to likely get lynched in the other thread, and thus not be a very useful decision.
  24. Araris Valerian
    @Eternum As I mentioned in the thread last cycle, lynching an inactive player is something we should do during the next meeting, to force players from the other thread to participate. With your kill role, those players would be good targets, since dead or alive, they aren't generating discussion. Also, once you are Medium you can kill inactives without having to worry about hitting villagers, since you would have a new win-con. However, we need more information from the lynch than killing Polking would give us (although I suppose if he flipped elim you might get suspicious of me). So, if we don't lynch an inactive/lurker, who does that leave? Reginald Canuk (Dalinar Kholin) Marv (Hemalurgic Headshot) Kintas (Jondesu) Araris Valerian (Araris Valerian) Noah (Eternum) Tautali Laust (Megasif) Centaurus (Darkness Ascendant) That hurts. 5/12 players aren't participating... If all of the elims are active, then we have basically lost this game already. As for my vote, I'm going with Megasif. From a village perspective, I don't get why you would find DA suspicious. If an elim gets voted Medium, then Doc could see if they knew the win-con, and we could lynch the elim Medium next cycle. If I was an elim I would be desperately avoiding a Medium vote right now. DA's willingness to go for that role makes him soft-cleared IMO. Also, It's totally pointless to guess what happened in Zeta. Unless somebody is willing to step up and take responsibility for killing somebody, the randomness makes that sort of talk a waste of time.
  25. Araris Valerian
    I can definitely get behind Eternum as medium, since he's soft-cleared IMO. Edit: We need at least 7 votes for the medium to change at this point.
×
×
  • Create New...