My apologies is this is off topic, already postulated elsewhere, or not the right place to post, but the thread got me thinking.
We often assume that the statement '3 of 16 ruled... now the broken one reigns... etc' means that the broken one is odium and he is in charge.
Has it been considered that the the broken one could in fact be still be Honour, in a dead yet splintered form essentially in conflict with the fellow splinters?
All the societies on Roshar seem to have their own view on honour, based on their own culture.
Has their individual ideas of how to live with honour in life been distorted by an individual splinter, or an external influencer - ie odium who then just sits back and lets peoples cultural differences lead them to self destruct while off world. (I am not sure Odium is on Roshar during TWoK but believe he is in transit on the way back)?
-The Shin have a clear view on honour (don't touch the rocks etc)
-The Alethi seem to find honour in the contest of war or general contest
-Even the Parshendi often seem to act with honour
-Kaladin and Dalinar are trooping back towards what seems to be the original take on honour held by the radients.
All these different views on Honour end up causing conflict between cultures and characters (just what Odium wants).
Perhaps Dalinar's 'Unite them vision' refers to trying to to get much more back together than just the Alethi and people of Roshar.
If you buy into the idea that the shard blades and plate are of Honour, then much of Roshar seems to be ruled by the lust to acquire shards, and shard holders do the ruling.
--
Anyway, who talks to Kaladin when riding the storm? Surely Honour, would not call Kaladin Child of Honour/Tanavast if he was in fact Honour? Would he not just say "My Child"?
This could be a splinter talking, but it probably more likely Cultivation, or can the shard (if not held) still talk to people?
Terrible theory and diversion I know, ahh - but its late here!