-
Posts
4240 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by The Unknown Medallion
-
LG 111:The Third Great Awakening
The Unknown Medallion replied to Araris Valerian's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Really, there's no reason to read the rules until everyone else has figured out what scenario it is- 64 replies
-
LG 111:The Third Great Awakening
The Unknown Medallion replied to Araris Valerian's topic in Sanderson Elimination
I will spectate for now. I don't think I have it in me for a free-for-all- 64 replies
-
Harry Potter canon? Never heard of it
-
Kas is gagging in disgust right now and has no idea why
-
@Archer I used a spreadsheet for voting in these games: It worked very well and could definitely be useful for a rerun of this voting mechanic. The only problem is that it looks ugly without spreadsheet coding, but it's not particularly hard to calculate even without
-
It's a shame when the consensus is right but still not enough to get the vote. I think that this Ruleset would work well with the spreadsheet voting system I've used in the past Edit: Curious why @|TJ| revealed the Obliviate
-
So you think voting villagers is e!indicative (sure, you say it's NAI bit that's not what your comments and reads say), man do I have something to tell you about this game Especially when mine are basically statistically expected I think Wahr and Mint are pretty clear teammates, what with giving Ink the +2s that saved them this cycle I'd probably guess a low active as the fourth to explain why they didn't also upvote Ink What even is this We're voting Prefects because a prefect has to be elim. There's two left and one of is both widely village read and brought this PoE to our attention We have to vote an elim today, and a prefect (Ink) is by far our best shot Uhhh You wrong? Except I kinda agree, just for different seasons. I can't excuse Mint giving their only plus to Ink. At least Wahr gave their +3 to TJ, but the fact that they're both at 2 to seem less obvious is incredibly suspicious to me
-
@|TJ| This is the only mention c2. It's not explicit, but I assume elims that were specifically looking for Prefect identities could find it. Coco/Araris tied for second. No mention of Doc, but an examination of our PM members would likely lead to the assumption that Doc won. @DrakeMarshall, I also saw this while scrolling and figured I might as well quote it to you. Why are you switching up on me? Just a few cycles ago you were defending me if Coco was village, and she was Edit: Thought those would merge. Oops
-
I don't think a low thread control elim tries to throw doubt in the poe very much, and both Ink and Ver fit that mold. Am I talking around the problem? I mainly addressed TJ, who is literally in the pool. Not that I've spent many words at all, cause this rollover time sucks for me I'm currently going for Ink, and I think Ver and TJ are roughly equally likely to be elim Again, I'm engaging with the topic at hand, every post has addressed it on some level I think. You are tunneling at least a little bit Aman v!read me toward the end I think, but idr. And do you really think e!me has this few positive votes when I could be upvoting my teammates. At least one teammate has to be Village read enough that e!me could justify it. I still think we did, I'm going to check now actually. Doc also didn't say he was going to self-protego in the PM. I don't think he even mentioned it as a general strategy.
-
I actually hate this post. I know why Drake made it and the claim, but it still reads bad tonally I know you're dead now, but to me, if you switch your name and pfp, it's essentially the same as getting a pinch-hitter I think the elims switching up their kill doctrine is in response to the prefect pool containing an elim, as well the highest voted player being more obfuscated. I don't like that you're considering e!TJ here. Doc didn't tell us (Slytherin) that he was protegoing himself, so there was no accountability. I suppose he could have lied to e!TJ about it, but that feels convoluted.
-
Yeah, I just assumed you were joking completely, so I saw no reason to let newer plays get confused by it. Tbh, if I had known it was a reaction test I would have let it play out a little more, but I also wouldn't have made a joke claim in response
- 849 replies
-
- extra credit
- extra dead
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Never, that's not allowed (sometimes rulesets have secrets, but the presence of secrets must be declared and still approved) We are all joking Well that's settled Through the Living Ink You think we can read?
- 849 replies
-
- extra credit
- extra dead
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
That is definitely misunderstanding I was being tongue on cheek and would have responded that way to any blank vote You said you wanted negatives don't complain when you get them. I likely would have changed my votes (don't ask me to who, I don't know), but I was at a wrestling camp literally all day yesterday.
- 849 replies
-
- extra credit
- extra dead
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I didn't give positives out, though I wish I had. I didn't have much time nor good service before wrestling kept me away until after rollover Hey, I'm in Slytherin too I don't recall anyone explicitly claiming their specific numbers, though susses were shared that may not have been included in thread. Don't remember anything more than that though, so maybe asking Doc was the correct decision
- 849 replies
-
- extra credit
- extra dead
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Aman is completely joking, which should be obvious considering there is no scan in the rules
- 849 replies
-
- extra credit
- extra dead
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
