The Unknown Medallion
-
Posts
4240 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by The Unknown Medallion
-
Appreciate it, but I don't know if I could handle this even if I wasn't busy with wrestling -
I'll nominate @A Jo in the Bush, @Doc12, and @Archer (are you around around or just here for the AG )
-
I am good with Jo for now. I hope he can stand by me on that. I don't like how static we've gotten these last few days, but there's not much I can do considering I've been busy with wrestling, and the current elims likely aren't findable based on vote connections. I'll try to do some vote analysis tomorrow, but I probably won't be able to find much I highly doubt it's a gambit considering there likely aren't more than two evils right now
-
Think I have to go Honor’s Ghost for self pres. Don't like the votes popping up on me for little reason The problem is that we're almost certainly dealing with a convert here, so there's no connections to work from. I'm not fond of Jo, and he's who I want to look at next/if enough people are willing to follow me tonight. The convert is going to be looking for the Shardbearer right now, and that's exactly what Jo's gambit is doing. That combined with his push on me is worrying.
-
@Doc12 Any response since I can see you're online?
-
? I started the Akimiko train. Mistfallen had no votes when I first voted there
-
This seems to be skipping over the train on TOW entirely, which was at least a third of my reasoning for voting Akimiko. It seems weird that you also would think everyone's going after Akimiko for tone when I think we've been pretty clear it's about more than that while Akimiko keeps dragging back to that being the only point I'm really conflicted here, because Akimiko still isn't really engaging. There's no way to tell if Akimiko is really being this gloomy, in which case I feel really bad about exing them, or if they're playing genuine emotion up to survive In the end, until further notice, my vote is staying because Akimiko's flip either way will be very useful
-
^ Same, there's two hours left and I'm fully willing to switch if convinced
-
The extra votes are worrying me. Still confident enough that Akimiko is e, but I don't trust a lot of the late additions whichever way she flips
-
But why not say this earlier? Why not open with this? Every time I've changed my playstyle, I've pretty explicitly mentored it. Also, why does an aggressive play style involve requiring a consensus train on d1, when information about vote movements is most useful, and why is doing otherwise letting the elims win? Like, I believe that you were trying a new playstyle and I don't have a problem with it, there's more reason to think you're an elim than just tone
-
That was my first guess too, but, one, this is the time to break character or hint while within character (straight up no reason to not do the latter), and also the character doesn't seem like the one the signup describes
-
Like, what is this? This doesn't feel like how Akimiko was in previous games, furthermore, it's overdramatic and misrepresentative of my reasons. Might be confbias tunneling, but the feels like an elim digging a deeper and deeper hole with the Mist voters potentially being teammates trying to save Akimiko (more likely confbiasing on the second than the first imo)
-
Ah I see, I thought you were taking about the first bit, that makes more sense
-
?
-
Wth is Akimiko's tone here Why do you feel so weird??? Edit: Ninja’d, but that Wahr post does not make me like him or Akimiko any more at all
-
Akimiko
-
>.> ~ I don't like the TOW train. Feels defensive of Wahr, not that I'm advocating returning to a newbie. I can see that Elim doc quite vividly though. "Wahr is getting votes" "They aren't defending themselves" "try the newbie defense" "it's not working well enough, start a counter train"
-
Rude Doc12 How that for a vote
-
What about offering to convert people to my cause? Or if they ask really really nicely?
-
That order is completely nonsensical now that I think about it. Hmm Updated citation: DrakeMarshall, "QF78 - Cycle 1: Servants of a New Storm," SE, 17thshard.com, 31 January 2026 https://www.17thshard.com/forums/topic/201900-qf78-cycle-1-servants-of-a-new-storm/page/2/#findComment-2031387
-
DrakeMarshall, "SE." The Cosmere, Tor, 31 January 2026, https://www.17thshard.com/forums/topic/201900-qf78-cycle-1-servants-of-a-new-storm/
-
I approved these rules! Can't say I remember them in the slightest however I remember converts and an sk and that's about it. Also a spren I think
-
GM Signups & Discussion Thread
The Unknown Medallion replied to Elbereth's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Me and Jo will just run the AG again, same rules and only a slightly modified distro -
Funnily enough, my first game was also a TJ game I'll sign up, though I doubt I'll roleplay so no name
-
GM Signups & Discussion Thread
The Unknown Medallion replied to Elbereth's topic in Sanderson Elimination
This would be after the QF, which signups haven't even been posted for yet. So a decent bit into February
