Jump to content

The Unknown Medallion

Members
  • Posts

    4244
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by The Unknown Medallion

  1. Thank you. I tried to send a message in there, but I don’t think very many people if anyone noticed.
  2. Is it fine for me to get the game up?
  3. Definitely recommend the Licanius Trilogy if you haven't read it. Powder Mage is also very good, and the author either just released a new book in a different series or is about to.
  4. I can explain it, at least a little. Archer will have to release more info as they see fit. Not longer after Kas placed their vote on me, I contacted Kas with a two (three really) pieces of information that made me seem village to him. Archer may reveal them as he sees fit. I give full and express permission to out me on everything but the last detail of our PM. I have info that nobody else does, being that I am confirmed Village in my own eyes, so I know that the two main trains were pure. I can definitely see a Conq/JNV team. Devo could have saved Fifth, but they might not have been on. There is a world where Kas/Archer is evil, but Kas last minute vote changing in a way that was almost guaranteed to be perceived as sus makes me disbelieve that world. There is no benefit to it. TGK could fit into either Conq or JNVs slot. So my pool is Conq, JNV, TGK. Edit: Oh, wait, TGK was attacked and survived. I'm locking in my official guess at Conq and JNV then. I'll also mention that all my lenses were shattered, and Conq and Kas were the only ones who knew I had Truthfinders, and Kas thought I only had Trackers until 4:58ish(two minutes before rollover in my timezone). Decide who you think shattered them for yourselves, but I'm going with guy who had almost an hour where they were for sure active rather then the one who had two minutes and had just woken up. (according to our PM).
  5. Don't like that vote from Devo, feels like it's definitely trying to protect Wizard, but Devo also vote late so might not be completely evil.
  6. Kas. Wizard. was waiting for that. Doesn't guarantee e!Wizard, as he's demonstrated a strong desire to stay alive, but hey, I don’t like dying either.
  7. Anyone? How far in are you/is this a reread?
  8. I guess that makes sense. I don’t like to reasoning, and certainly don't agree with it, it's understandable. Goodness we have a lot of inactives, but on a pure numbers game, Fifth was dead last cycle. It's possible, if not likely, that the elims didn't look past that when deciding whether or not to push back hard or even hammer. Of course, that correlates with an inactive team as well, but everyone but you, Joe, and maybe Conq fit that bill. And me I guess. I'm happier with these explanations, but I'll keep my vote for other reasons.
  9. Why does that put us in the same activity profile? Only the last part has anything to do with activity, and it's more of a meta thing for me anyway. Edit: You know what, this doesn't feel like V!Kas behavior. I've been consistently null for two cycles then for no particular reason I jump to vote worthy suspect. Mat noticed something c1 and I agree, something is off with you, Kas. @Elandera for the edit vote.
  10. Why do I keep getting lumped into the low activity group? I have been the third highest poster the last two cycles, Wizard had a third of the number of posts I did. At this point if I'm null it's your own fault, and if your only reason for sussing me is my perceived inactivity, then there isn't a reason. Sorry if that's a little heated, but make sure what you say is true before you use it as reasoning to vote someone.
  11. I know this is a double post, but it's been a while since my last one and we need to get the LG up and rolling. @Ashbringer @little wilson and @Elbereth @StrikerEZ Ash again And me. If nobody else wants it I can take it.
  12. As a regular non-voter, my reason for not voting is because I would rather be silent then wrong. Why be wrong now when you could be right later?
  13. I meant playstyle wise, since people don't tend to believe when someone talks about their own meta. I'm not sure. The mechanics are pretty simple, so we didn't have or need discussion about that. Honestly, I'm fine with what was discussed, it wasn't much but I don’t think there could have been much more. Honestly, we just need another player to testify to see if this is normal, if you want a relatively short read for how I act when I'm due to be exed, BT2 might be a good example if you read the Cryptic doc in combination with the thread. Otherwise I'm not sure. I must have miscounted yours, I pegged you at 5. I was mostly just laughing at irony, with me being called relatively inactive by people with less posts then me, even if their content might be a little bit greater. You weren't the first btw, Joe at least has pegged me and I think a few others have as well.
  14. Yah, that's what I said. It knows stormlight terms, and a single mistborn word.
  15. I know what I say has no bearing, but you can look or someone else can confirm, I don’t vote unless I have a solid suspicion, or I have to for exlo. I mentioned earlier to Kas, I would rather have a little bit of accurate suspicion then a lot of barely supported guesses. The most meaningful thing I have is I don't like Kas' c1 posts, but their first post this cycle feels not only vil but like vil Kas, and the rest I haven't gotten any particular read from. Mat was my vil read, but you may have noticed that he's a corpse now. Also, what discussion? The Luckspren vs Ash discussions? The other major discussion was the inactivity/CC debate which I participated in a decent amount. I also discussed the Tie Strat with Kas. That's the Majority of topics we had last cycle I think. Also, I didn’t come out swinging to Joe's post. I corrected an inaccuracy because I hate being misrepresented. Something else to note, I just went back through the thread, and I had more posts than you. I was in the top three posters last cycle. Maybe you should interact more, participate in some of the discussions. That meaningful enough for you?
  16. You must know a thing to destroy it.
  17. Well, you've claimed TL, so if Luck is TL as well, that says some very interesting things about the distro. How does you asking this question track with defending the tie strategy with it's not meant to catch an elim?
  18. It wasn't even on the topic of inactivity anymore, we were talking about CCs at that point, which, I get, is pretty close, but it’s stretching to call that a defense.
  19. What reason would someone have to know you had TL? Everyone had lenses, so it could have just been a shot in the dark.
  20. You claim to be on their side and you disparage our cause, yet you use the very things we purport.
  21. It is very quiet, but I'd probably be around more if there was more to interact with. I expect more discussion d2.
  22. I've also been noticing something off with Kas, but I think I know where they're coming from, so I'm going to leave it be.
  23. I've been around for about a year longer than JNV btw, I just tend to be pretty forgettable because of my activity level. I think we just go about this differently. I'd rather have less more accurate info than more more inaccurate info.
×
×
  • Create New...