Jump to content

Mat

Members
  • Posts

    7773
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Everything posted by Mat

  1. Because he would have seen the name of whoever was actually voting on him. He saw the name of a Cett, and saw that I had two actions, meaning that he knew I was Vin. He chose to out Vin over the Cett, phrasing it in a way that would make you all exe me instead of having his team do it. Edit: Well yeah, I don't know for sure if it was Copper he used on Illwei, though I assume so because my Seeker scan failed. I guess he could have targeted Illwei with whatever other metal he burned, but I don't know what that was.
  2. Well, either way. That just makes him more likely to out Vin over whoever that person was. See my response to this, but it didn't do nothing. It nulled my scan, which Striker would have probably found useful after learning I was Vin. Technically, Vin is the only one besides Zane who can use two actions- Cett's Mistborn doesn't have Atium or Duralumin. (Random fact- up until recently, I though Duralumin was 'Duraluminum' :P)
  3. Well, yeah. Tin/Seeker doesn't differentiate between atium action and not atium action so I don't actually know when he used Copper. It makes the most sense for him to have rolled Copper originally, though he also could have rolled Steel C1 and not been able to use it again in consecutive cycles, making nulling my scan the next best thing. I don't know. Striker did likely see whoever voted on him to kill him, along with my double-actions, and he must have thought that taking out Vin was more worthwhile that the random person who was assigned the kill, which makes sense.
  4. Because he used Atium after me, he would have seen my scans. He used copper, and so my Seeker scan came up blank. The Tin one showed me that the other person Smoked was Illwei, but since Striker wouldn't have known that Illwei was for sure his teammate it would have just been a guess. You say that but it's not provable to say that. It's all you can say to try to avoid getting killed. It can, because it revealed to me that Illwei attacked me.
  5. Philico burned brass. Or well, not really. He didn't have any Allomantic abilities, what with being a Sleepless, but that hadn't stopped him from making some... questionable decisions. Such as locking the Hero of Ages up in a closet far from Luthadel and taking her place. A gambit, yes, but one that would be well worth it. After his drastic failure in Fallion's Tears, he thought he deserved some fun. And, well, after this was all over he would simply free her and be on his way. None the wiser. Though that boy, the Watcher, Zane, had been trouble. He hadn't realized how thoroughly he had known Vin. That had made espionage difficult, and now there was nothing to do but show his face. Hello. Vin here :P. As mentioned above, I'm currently soothing Quinn's vote, though that really doesn't do any good since she's not voting on me. It didn't help that literally everyone else voted Archer who is still alive xD But nonetheless it's come to this. I bet Striker's pretty satisfied with making me claim I'm paranoid. Everyone who's played more than a few games with me knows that well- and when I see two cycles into the game that I've been actively participating in that not a single soul has read me as anything, I get really worried. And so I burned Atium C2. And saw the kill on me. Illwei's kill, to be exact. But the unfortunate thing was- I had already used Steel C1. On Archer. Because as I said, I'm paranoid and he was a suspect for me. Turns out that was completely useless, and just left me in a position to be attacked. I couldn't redirect xD This did let me take extra actions, though. So I targeted Striker with both Tin and Bronze, hoping that would clear up some form of my read on him because I was confused about reading him as village and elim both. Striker must have used Atium after that, and saw both my actions on him, and knew I was Vin. Hence the outing. It's... super unfortunate for me, but I guess I deserve it after GMing LordRuler!TJ who scanned dead villager after dead villager And so I ask now: Please don't kill me. It will be the least helpful thing for you. My vote stays where it is, on the person I know attacked me, knowing that unless there's a village Lurcher I'll be dead by next cycle and probably even then because both teams would double-tap me. Any questions? :P.
  6. I think if we're doing something like this it'd be a better idea to make it less of a rule and more of a formatting thing, like bold = super relevant point that I want you to see, or something like that. That way too you could use it more than once per cycle, but it'd also mean more to catch up on. I don't know if I'd change a lot if this became a thing, as I already sparingly do this, but it'd be interesting to see I kind of worry though that people rereading only the bold parts of the thread would miss something otherwise, though, so I'm not sure if there really is a good solution to this.
×
×
  • Create New...