Jump to content

Mat

Members
  • Posts

    7773
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Everything posted by Mat

  1. I think since evil!Bridge makes sense mainly just with evil!Archer, tying them wouldn’t do a whole lot. I don’t know which one of them would be a smarter kill, though. An evil Bridge flip leads to evil Archer, but a village Bridge flip doesn’t lead much and Archer still could be evil. It’s similar for Archer, an evil Archer flip suggests evil Bridge but village Archer doesn’t much of anything. So I don’t know. But I’m feeling good about either of those as far as the amount of resistance they’re getting.
  2. Reads list with no reasoning because I'm tired. Not that I don't have it, just that I don't feel like writing it out right now :P. Ask me later for specifics. The + and - in the Null section are Leaning village for + and leaning elim for - In a spoiler box just because it's tall @Quintessential, if you have the vcs for C1/C2 handy, could you c/p them so I can have them? Thanks. Orrr I guess just C1 cause C2s is right there.
  3. He said I was his only PM. Since he flipped village I’m inclined to believe that. Commented about how I haven’t sussed him yet (changed now xD), I mentioned I wouldn’t mind Archer being elim because it might semi-clear me and he agreed... I think he posted one of his posts in the PM before the thread and asked me what I thought of it. The one about other people’s PMs I think. Edit: Oh yeah and asked me to switch off Kings
  4. @Illwei I was elim in LG70 but village in the MR running alongside it. That was the one I made... questionable village decisions. I won’t be in again before rollover, mowing my lawn. And have been for the past two hours. The grass is long. Keeping vote half self pres and half because I think Kings is elim. Gut against xino but take that with the grain of salt that he voted on me in that post for something I didn’t do :P.
  5. If you're sus of late switches, you'll love the EoD sometimes xD Late switches are normal, to say the least. But seriously, I unvoted a villager because I didn't like the train, and then voted the person that was killed. It's more likely that Liranil was their kill before I voted them, not after, also. (Could we look into that? Probably not.) If TUO had flipped elim, sussing me for my switch would be fair. But they didn't Yeah, hence my Kings/Dannex/Archer. Dannex/Kings for that, adding in Archer because he's been against killing Kings. But that seems over-obvious :/
  6. Kings-Archer-Dannex is way to obvious to actually be the team, right? Or are the elims just not distancing this game? I would like the exe today to be on one of them, but I guess I don't need it to be. I'd like it not to be on me because I know exactly how well that will turn out and so far I have seen literally no reasoning against me so that's cool. Bridge Four is probably village, in my opinion. First, basically the same as yours. Their suspect list C1 included Bridge (no reason so far to suspect them), me (also no reason so far to suspect them), and Dannex (minimal reasoning to suspect them) and then they choose... Bridge, which I would say is the choice out of the three that makes the least sense. They also said in that post that they'd rather not vote the same in thread as in their PM, "not for completely personal reasons". They go on to explain that it's about making each game unique, but I... still don't like the sound of that. To your second question, someone definitely could take my "I don't like reasoning things like that" as a setup defense or a deflection for when my teammate Kings flips elim :P. It's not, I actually don't like killing someone just because someone else might be their teammate, and I'm voting Kings anyway because there's reason to do so beyond that.
×
×
  • Create New...