Jump to content

Channelknight Fadran

Members
  • Posts

    21457
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    95

Everything posted by Channelknight Fadran

  1. Rule #2 for Real This Time: I'm the professor here, and I make the rules
  2. WRONG Rule #1 of Philosophy: You are not trying to defend your opinion with opinions. You are trying to defend your perception of the truth by distinguishing logical fallacies in the opposition, and support your own by providing a clear and concise thesis.
  3. Want to learn how to think about thinking about stuff?

     

    1. Aeoryi

      Aeoryi

      I've always wanted sentience :P 

  4. You love dogs for their loyalty You love cats because we all deserve a fluffy little demon in our lives
  5. yes hi here it is First discussion: the ocean is full of meat and vegetables and is therefore a soup, thus the Earth is a bowl.
  6. so what if we're just wrong?

    1. Show previous comments  19 more
    2. Aeoryi

      Aeoryi

      Why you guys ruining logic. To question is a passion. And passions are the way of odium. The way of odium is dark and... -you get the point. 

       

    3. Channelknight Fadran

      Channelknight Fadran

      Odium is only one of four passions. He didn't trademark it.

    4. Thaidakar the Ghostblood

      Thaidakar the Ghostblood

      Final Shard = Socrates = Passion.

  7. Falchion left her to it - generally, it was healthier to let Knalya stew over these kinds of things.
  8. TIL that the bomb dropped on Hiroshima contained 64 kg of Uranium

    Of that 64 kg, roughly 8 grams actually underwent the fission process. The rest was blown away in the blast

     

    which means

    8 grams of uranium = 15 kTons of TNT

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. Szeth Pancakes

      Szeth Pancakes

      Quote

      Thats gotta be a minecraft world record. :P

      o_o

    3. Frustration

      Frustration

      Yeah, the first several bombs were really bad.

    4. PyroPhile
  9. "Really, you don't..." Falchion stopped. The ramen, it seemed, had brought a spark of inspiration to her tiny little brain. "Could you make a dress... that's also a suit?"
  10. She swallowed her ramen. "Oh, ah - you don't have to. I was just gonna go in my cape and such."
  11. Falchion had half a mouthful of ramen when she stuck her head into Knalya's room. "Thur frest durss?"
  12. Y'all remember that old SU I made about how interesting Music Theory is?

    And y'all remember that even older SU I made about how we need more Sea Shanties?

    For some reason it hadn't even occurred to me that there's Sea Shanty Musical Theory.

     

    It seems obvious now, but the whole reason they were "written" (that is to say, invented and carried out orally) in the first place was to coordinate their work. Musical beats are pretty much the most intuitive method of keeping time without any fancy stopwatches, which means it's pretty much the best way to do it if you happened to exist in the several thousand years before we figured out how to mass-produce easily-accessible timepieces.

    So what do you do when you all need to hoist at the ropes simultaneously? What's the best way to coordinate when you put a good ol' heave into the work? Music.

    Rule One is that Sea Shanties are work songs: you need a clear beat to heave your ropes and row your oars to. There are a couple distinct types of shanties that you can work with:

    • Long-Drag: Otherwise known as a Halyard Shanty (which is metal as hell), which have prolonged sections for - get this - when you need to be doing long pulls on the ropes. "Hangin' Johnny" is a solid example of this.
    • Short-Drag: Otherwise known as a Forsheet or Mainsheet Shanty (one of which is metal as hell), which have shorter, burstier beats. "Haul Away, Joe" is a really popular example.
    • There are others, but they all kinda fall under those two categories.

    Rule two is that the general form of a Sea Shanty is that of the basic Call-and-Response technique, which is this case is very literal as there's often a lead who starts the line and the workers who finish it - for example:

    • Lead: I thought I heard the Old Man say
    • Refrain: "Leave her, Johnny, leave her"
    • Lead: Tomorrow ye will get your pay
    • Refrain: And it's time for us to leave her

    Rule three is that your chorus has pretty much got to repeat itself, which basically means you can stack as many verses as you want and keep people in the beat so as long as they know half of it.

    • Leave her, Johnny, leave her
    • Oh, leave her, Johnny, leave her
    • For the voyage is long and the winds don't blow
    • And it's time for us to leave her

    Past that there aren't really any rules for shanties that I can find. Common themes seem to follow an energetic yet kinda somber tone - like, you can bop to it, but it's still chill.

    Did sailors invent LoFi? I think sailors invented LoFi.

     

    Here's a bunch of shanties I listened to for research:

    Spoiler
    • Cheer'ly Men - pretty much the oldest sea shanty I could find. Sung by some dude in the 70s, so the quality was awful. 5/10.
    • Jack's the Lad - This was listed as one of the most classic sea shanties but I could only find orchestral "remasters." 0/10 (lame british orchestra).
    • Fire Down Below - One of the many "multi-work" songs that were brought to the "civilized" by the rather unfortunate slave trade. Singing was noted to be the number one method by which the rather unfortunate slaves actually worked in the first place; once again, we can thank the black people for the best music. 8/10 (bop)
    • Haul Away, Joe - One of the many renditions of the same-ish song. 10/10 (bop)
    • A Hundred Years Ago - In the 19th century, sea shanties were used as a way to maintain order on more disciplined ships. This was one of the ones they have listed. 8/10 (smooth)
    • One More Day - Another 19th-century song. I found a dope remix on youtube, which gets 10/10 for also being a bop.
    • Santiana - Yet another 19th-century, because all of these have been epic so far. The version I found was completely vocal, which means it's solid quality. 11/10 for authenticity.
    • Haul on the Bowline - Yes, another one, but this time I found a WHOLE FLIPPING CHANNEL with a SHANTY OF THE WEEK. Sean Dagher, who is the most redneck-looking guy I've ever laid eyes upon, and therefore 12/10.
    • All of these! Who would've guessed that I would've found a thirty-minute video full of entirely vocal shanties? I'm about halfway through and they've all been absolute bangers so far.

     

    What about the Wellerman? Drunken Sailor?

    These two are probably the most popular shanties in modern media, which is good because they're both bangers. Drunken Sailor dates back to the 1820s as the earliest, which means it was about in the same eras as all those other songs I rated pretty highly.

    The Wellerman was written in 1970, which might leave a bad taste in your mouth but is actually just the byproduct of sea shanties regaining popular after the ultimately fell off in the early 1900s - it wasn't until the late 40s that they started coming back on, and thank goodness for that. I don't usually approve of TikTok trends, but thank you Nathan Evans for bringing this sudden influx in Shanty popularity.

     

    So basically: if you're into writing songs, you should try your hand at Sea Shanties! They're awesome, and we deserve more of them.

    1. Show previous comments  22 more
    2. Aeoryi

      Aeoryi

      I hope you didn't screenshot the arguement

    3. kajsa ㅇㅅㅇ
    4. DramaQueen

      DramaQueen

      ...I don't really think that would count as an argument, I would consider it a discussion, but okay.

  13. Lots of complaints about how you can tell when a female character is written by a male author.

    Not many for when a male character is written by a female author? There was that whole thing a little while back for someone's work seeming like it was "written by a woman," which I think is just a backwards way of looking at it.

    I think the problem is that we boys just assume that we don't know jack diddly squat about our own gender and just assume that whatever's written is more accurate than whatever it is we believe. I mean, Peeta (from the Hunger Games) was pretty much as damsel-in-distress-pretty-face-love-interest as it gets, but no one craps on Suzanne Collins (that I know of). Guys are just like "yeah he's cool" and just read the story about the fun survival game.

    And believe me - I have read some awful crap by women. Both of us can be god-awful at writing.

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. Robin Sedai

      Robin Sedai

      Quote

      There was that whole thing a little while back for someone's work seeming like it was "written by a woman," which I think is just a backwards way of looking at it.

      Not heard of this tbh. For what it's it's worth I agree, it's silly to assume that only a woman can write a certain way.

      Quote

      I mean, Peeta (from the Hunger Games) was pretty much as damsel-in-distress-pretty-face-love-interest as it gets, but no one craps on Suzanne Collins (that I know of). Guys are just like "yeah he's cool" and just read the story about the fun survival game.

      To be fair, those tropes have a long history of being applied to women (along with a load of other sexist stereotypes) so it's natural that people are more sensitive when reading female characters. And fair enough, this can lead to some stupid takes and seeing things that aren't there.

      A tangent - women have been perceived as secondary to men for much of history. In a lot of older fantasy, there were basically no female characters; almost all of the interesting characters were male. This leads to a lot of internal biases, stereotypes, and people not being good at writing women because they haven't read enough interesting, three-dimensional female characters.

      There are a wide variety of female characters in fantasy these days, not just the heroine or Designated Badass love interest. Soldiers? Innkeepers? ? The poor lazy schmuck who dies in chapter three? All female, and I think that's awesome.

      Also, Peeta is a cool character and I would be A-okay if it was a girl in his place.

    3. Frustration

      Frustration

      Quote

      But otherwise, I think people take the whole thing a bit too seriously. Stereotypes are bad, yeah, but I think at this point we're looking for them more than actually just stumbling across them

      ^ This.

      If you are looking for something, especially in such an interpretative medium like writing you are always going to be able to find it, whether or not it was the author's intention.

       

      You can see this a lot in reviews as well, pick a book you love, and find a really long negative review of it, chances are the person writing it came into the book with preconceptions and forced the book to fit them. One that comes to mind right now is this review for Mistborn where the author claimed that it was some kind of bad YA. Because that makes sense.

       

      Now that's not to say there aren't horrible female depictions, there are. And there are horrible male depictions. I just think that the fantasy community at large should give the benefit of the doubt, and give authors chances to improve(especially new authors) rather than unequivocally condemning anything they perceive as a poor depiction.

       

      Sorry, that got a little long.

    4. kajsa ㅇㅅㅇ

      kajsa ㅇㅅㅇ

      Hmm. 
       

      I think mostly why this kind of thing happens is when authors don’t do their research. They don’t truly understand (none of us really will, but bear with me) the other sex’s thoughts or motives behind their actions. And when you don’t understand why a character is doing something, they can end up looking quite… flat. 
       

      Look, people are people. Sure, males and females differ in some ways, but in the big picture, we’re all the same. If you change your mindset to think like you’re writing human characters rather than male and female characters, I think it’s gonna be a lot easier to avoid stereotype. 
       

      and lastly, I think we should remember that stereotypes are not bad. of course, there will always be characters that will be “stereotypical”, and we might get bored with them or not like them much, that’s okay. They can also be so much fun! Stereotypes are not BAD. 
       

      in short, when writing the opposite sex: do your research. Ask around for feedback, recall memories and interactions. Rather than writing strictly male or strictly female characters, write HUMAN characters. 
       

      anyways, that was a bit of a rant, and I think it got a little muddled or unclear in some spots, but those are my views on the topic. 
       

      also, I think why male authors face so much criticism when writing female characters is because there will always be feminists and critics who disagree with the way a female character may behave. But authors will write characters the way they want, and we can’t really do much about it. 

  14. - Nedews, Sweden. April 7, 2014 - - Alrogbay Suites; 1444 Birch Avenue - - Floors: 13 (they skipped 11, which is unlucky) - - Room Layout: Two bedrooms, four beds, one living room, two bathrooms. Comes with WiFi and cable television - - Suite Layout: Three bedrooms, three beds, one master bedrooms, two living rooms, two bathrooms. Comes with WiFi and cable television - - Total Rooms: 250 - Total Suites (Top three floors): 30
×
×
  • Create New...