dannnex

NEVER I LOVE IT

Mmmmmmmmm randomness I love it. Carrots Gold Mines Rocking Chairs mmmmmmmmmmmmmm

I had a farmhouse with a grandfather clock... If you could eat one type of cereal for the rest of your life, what would you pick? You can still eat other food, but no other types of cereal.

I like everything, but I still think the problem of inactivity can be solved better. I think I’ll vote for it, as it’s better than the default, but I’ll probably try to amend it later with some sort of regulated “no-turns” idea. Also, having to go 2 entire rounds without posting to be declared inactive seems crazy. It’s been like 3 days and 5 pages of messages for less than 1/3 of a round. Having to wait something like 20 days for a player to be declared inactive seems like a long time. Are you talking about P302 here? I think so but I’m just making sure.

Wow this is getting a lot more attention than I thought it would, and these are some really great answers! Now, I have a follow up question to everyone who said they wouldn’t tell anyone. Can you think of any situation where you might tell someone? Any situation where you might experiment or use Hemalurgy?

Well, I do think that 204 and 206 can go, they don’t seem to matter all that much. I think P304 (the new rule part) is okay, at least I don’t think there’s anything wrong with it. P303 (again, just the new rule part) is another issue. I think it’s an okay way of handling the inactivity and turns issue, but I’m personally for abolishing turns completely so I probably wouldn’t vote for P303. So individually, I’m good with 4/5 of your proposals, but then there’s still the issue of only 3 RCs allowed.

I did not vote for 303 and 304 because I think they are each 2 proposals rolled into one, bringing the number of proposals in your turn to 5, violating rule 301. Your argument is that the term “amendment” is subjective and therefore you can “amend” rules 204 and 206 by deleting them and writing 2 completely different rules in their place. I think the term amendment is not subjective and in fact is defined by the dictionary and rule 103. You are trying to both enact and repeal in your proposals and calling them amendments. The contents of the rules themselves are a different matter. If you edit P303 to just repeal 204 and edit P304 to just repeal 206, you’d have my support.

I vote for 302 I do not vote for 303 or 304 Also, I think 302 might cause a problem with turning immutable rules mutable. I think that should still be a unanimous decision but 302 could be interpreted as only needed a majority to transmute a rule. I still vote for it though. I wonder if we should mess with non-simple majorities in the future. Like we say you need a 2/3s majority for “X”. Also, I had some ideas for how to make the rules doc a little better, but I gtg so I’ll type them out later.

Granted, you are a bronze compounder. The nightwatcher is too lazy to double check the allomantic table for bronze, so she can’t give you a thematically appropriate bane. Instead, your hair is now permanently slimy and bright green. I wish for the copy of Smash Bros Ultimate that I bought on eBay and was supposed to arrive 2 days ago to to arrive unharmed.

Very mildly rated fun fact: The Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy, Roman, or an Empire.

I think that line is a bit too blurry. Also, yeah I think Xino’s last 2 amendments, 303 and 304, have little to do with with laws they’re amending, 204 and 206, respectively. Also, may I propose a quick, meta, hot-fix, not really official style rule? Can we all just agree that we can double post instead of editing our messages? In a game like this, edits get confusing quickly.

I like rule 302, should probably be changed to the term “simple majority” though, for consistency. Rule 303 makes sense, but I like my proposed method for dealing with inactivity better. Also, I don’t see what this has to do with rule 204. This amendment doesn’t make any sense in the context of 204: Did you mean 104? That makes a bit more sense. Rule 304 seems too convoluted for the time being, I think we still have to fix a lot of the basic rules before we start on stuff like that. For example, rule 301 and 111 cause a potential mild paradox, as 301 says multiple proposals are allowed while 111 says they aren’t. And 111 will be hard to change as we need to first propose it loses immutability and then we need to propose an amendment. As of right now both of those will need unanimous votes.

Well, taco salad with ranch makes sense cuz you have lettuce and cabbage and whatever other green stuff is in salad, just putting in a normal taco would be bad. But he did these things to point attention away from his true atrocity.

Okay so that’s unanimous so 301 gets approved, rule 202 is amended and renamed 301, and I get.....quickmaths...... 10 points? and I see all of that has been recorded in the rules doc already. Ok cool. Edit 1: ah didn’t see the new page, now I’m doubly redundant. Redundantly redundant. Edit 2: Couple random ideas that people can steal on their turn if they want: I think we should do away with turns completely and instead just say that you can’t post a rule-change unless there’s (1/3 * no. of players) rule changes between you and your last rule change. With this many players, there’d need to be 2 other suggested RC before you can post another one. If this is implemented we should do away with the up to 3 sugs in one post.

He spoke German. It’s almost unspeakable.

He just wished for infinite power and his bane was to fall over? Night blood + infinite investiture could literally cause the heat death of the cosmere. Yes this is perfectly balanced. also yeah probably. What would happen if someone’s spirit web just was completely annihilated? I don’t think they would die... maybe something like complete loss of identity? Something along the lines of a dementors kiss? also you didn’t wish for anything.

Take your pick! You can answer the question multiple times for the multiple ways you could have figured it out. Maybe you find a book on the ground, maybe Ruin whispers it in your head, maybe you have some sort of vision. How would each method of discovering it affect how you use the information?

I really liked that one, very passive aggressive Is that all of them? Do we need to set up a poll or something to vote?

They roasted the house in a rap battle.

I mean, the only time they ever mention the Prime Directive is when they’re about to break it in order to prevent needless suffering I just realized the word “needless” is just the word “needles” with another “s” and I’m mildly freaking out

I think that detail is why I remember it tbh, I think elementary school me must’ve been like “wooooaaaaahhhh“ to such a high degree that my brain decided to file the entire series away.

Ohohoh I remember those books. I had to read the words “septimus heap” like 20 times but it finally clicked. Those books feel like a weird dream to me, I barely remember reading them but the scenes I do remember feel weirdly vivid. Like I remember something about ice tunnels and a magic sled. And something about swamp. And something about an island that gave calypso vibes. Like I swear I’ve had dreams based on this series but I never realized it because it seems to be buried in my subconscious. I don’t remember much cause I read the whole series in like a week, but iirc the big reveal at the very end is Or at least that’s how I remember interpreting it. Now I’m being reminded of a ton of other books I completely forgot about that have like, the same vibe. Like I think I remember something called the Magic Thief where dude turns into a cat or something? And what was that 10 book series with the disappointing ending...I think it was called Pendragon something?

What are y’all’s opinions on double posting? I personally find it horrendous.