I disagree. Sure, if there were only positive options, then we could only choose positive, and yes, that is good. However, some options would be more positive than others. Under those circumstances, since people still have free will, God would ask that they choose the most positive choice. People would then see most positive as good and least positive as evil. And, in a way, they would be right, as they would be choosing the least possible positive option. No matter how positive the options get, this would continue to be a problem unless all options were equally positive. If all options were equally positive, then our actions would not have any meaning, as they would all have the same end result. Therefore, our free will is meaningful because we can make a difference in ourselves by choosing how positive or negative our actions are, out of the options given to us. If we choose the best option, we change ourselves for the better. If we choose the worst option, then we change ourselves for the worse.
The best way to show us how our actions place on this spectrum is through the consequences of our actions. If the only options were positive, it would be incredibly difficult to understand what is needed to make ourselves better rather than worse, because we would only see ourselves doing good in the world, no matter what we were doing.
In conclusion, both positive and negative are necessary to give context and meaning to our free will.
if anything I said is offensive to, I am sincerely sorry.
if any of what I said doesn’t make sense, I am also sorry, I am not very good at writing. Just let me know what was confusing and I’ll try to explain it better.