-
Posts
842 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Mark IV
-
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Wow...... -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
1) agreed. 2) well, I didn't have any other cards to play. This was my first interaction in a forum, with you guys. It was also the first time I was playing such serious SE type game. Now, I feel a little more confident. So I put a vote down, bam! I get a vote on myself. 3) I do generally start PMs with the intent to gather information. But, just not so early on. And, activity had died down at the start of D1. Now that you say it, I guess people were busy at the time. 4) the way I saw it is that you (as far as I could recall) hadn't made many contributing posts. Direct me to your posts before N3, and I will stand corrected. 5)I didn't really expect a roleclaim that early. It was N1. No sane person would roleclaim so easily. 7) doesn't really go against my points. You know the purpose. You know the target. You know the person I was trying to protect. 8)thanks for the reminder. I got caught up in the game's heat. No, I did not send the code to anyone. Later, I had realised that sending the codes out at a future date would make no difference. Don't try guessing. The password isn't meant for that. One last thing. Stink, could you state your reasons for suspicion of HS? Why do you suspect him so? -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Let me make myself rather more clear. 1) I meant that you had contributed nothing except for one-liners (as far as I was aware). And, now, instead of defending yourself, you're accusing me. Not exactly innocent, is it? But, I'll overlook that. 2) those statements about seonid's death were just my (naive) thoughts. And, seeing as how they gained no momentum, I get a feeling that they couldn't really be suspicious. 3) well, I have already stated my reasons for supporting HS to you, but I'll make them public, cause why not?- has tried to advocate conversation when the thread had gone dead. Also formed a PM group with the explicit intent of starting conversation. 4)I changed the topic in our PM that first (and consequent times) because we had already gone off topic before, and I couldn't think of saying anything, so, "Topic change". If you want to discuss something specific, say it explicitly. I'm not good at catching implications. 5) if I did want to know your role, I would say it like -"Stink, what's your role?" 6) I generally joke in our PMs, and you can ask Maill that I don't expect anything serious. We have already discussed that PMs with you become nonsense after a while. (Not that I don't enjoy them). I didn't expect you to roleclaim. 7) I'm not sure why you have put in my entire post history, but, if you see, I have stated accusations, voted with purpose, and supported a person. Clearly, this shows that not all my posts are pointless. 8) my objections against you were that you hadn't said much in the way of contribution. I'm pretty sure that it was Maill who Lopen had contacted, along with me (but, that just might be my brain). Phew! My longest post yet. Hopefully this will convince you, Stink, that I'm not merely posting pointless posts. Adequate explanation? -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
And, one last doubt. We would need a proxy for the seeker. Wouldn't we? (Or am I horribly mistaken? And Kas was part of the Trusted Trinity?) In any case, I am only raising doubts right now so that we don't get stuck while executing the plan. -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Well, there is one thing that I don't understand. (Two actually) 1) you're advocating that you (Kas-As a smoker) be lynched? Or seeked? 2) why do you want to kill all smokers? Based on an assumption that one of them is most probably spiked? IMO, that's the same chance as the role less have of being spiked.(not saying that they should be killed, just giving a comparison) So, is there an underlying logic that I'm missing? Or did we just not think over it (unlikely)? Aw man... I'm gonna miss Ada's summaries.... -
Oops. Double post. Didn't see that!
-
Why break it in the first place?!
-
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Multiple voting? Is that allowed? -
True specimens of both are legendarily hard to come by. Waiting is like plastic bags.
-
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Am I the only one who finds it a bit amusing that every tineye message somehow ends up entangled with wyrm? -
... continously growing larger and larger. Oranges are like friendships. ..
-
.. you finish them up too quickly, then find none left on the plate. Highstorms are like humans...
-
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Any tineyes want to give us cryptic messages with codes that are nigh uncrackable? Go ahead! Perhaps Maill may crack them! -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Oh! And before I forget! Happy new year. (Though it's almost 2nd Jan over here. ) -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
You're stumped? Where's the lumbermen? -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Four went back to his shelter. A place where 3 roofs met. The place made quite a cozy place for any person to live. But a door wouldn't be too much to ask for, would it? As for the lynch, Four was happy as well as unhappy. On the bright side, no one innocent was killed. But, on the contrary, no one was killed. They were no closer to safety. Another thing that worried him was that someone was after Hellscythe. Now, why would anyone do that? Such a nice person, advocating discussion in the group. Well, since there wasn't going to be much discussion from the looks of things, Four settled down in his 'home'. He covered himself with a bit of spare cloth he had found in an alley (I know. Not the most hygienic, but beggars can't be choosers.) Four closed his eyes. But never stopped paying attention. If there was one thing he had learnt in Tyrian Falls, it was that one never stopped paying attention. Even around friends. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yes. I am saying that I trust Hellscythe. I have stated it before, and I'll state it again. As for the manipulations, you emotional allomancers just can't leave us alone, can you? Anyways, these are my thoughts on the results. Happy backstabbing sleeping! -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
There definitely is a Rioter here. I'm just not sure about the soothers. -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Woah! Manipulations again. I think someone was trying to get Hellscythe killed. -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
-2 minutes. -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
2 more minutes. -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Put this. [ color=#ff0000] Hellscythe [ /color]. Just remove the spaces in the Brackets. Note to GM. I'm not voting here! -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Just delete this. Mistakes were made. -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Woah! Is that a band wagon? Is that Stink in front of it? Wow! -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Well, now that I've awoken from a fesh sleep, I wish to side with hael's reasoning. I know, I seem a bit too jumpy, but Stink has been non-committal up til now, and that semi quite suspicious. So, Haelbarde STINK Sorry for any typos. In a rush. -
Anniversary Game 2: Return of the Koloss
Mark IV replied to Metacognition's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Could I call for a vote tally? If it isn't too much trouble?
