Darkness Ascendant

Well then to the Elims, may you please not kill anyone until we know who the Misborn is, and you can like, pretend to be villager to propose who you think it is to us villagers and then we can maybe lynch them so you can kill us during night, that'd be good. Nope I just see no reason for you to have lied about your role In fact, you pushing for a lynch on me even still, where according to you the evidence more than justifies it, which makes no sense. Cos there isn't any evidence. I'm sorry but evidence is rooted and is inherently fact, cold hard proof which supports whether a proposition is true or false. And my friend you have no "facts" which can indicate my alignment, and what you do have you are indeed unsure about and await Joe's testimony. Whatever you "deduce" from my facts are untrue, as I who inherently knows the truth can attest to. In fact, you pushing on me for barely any reason is starting to be grating, in fact, I believe this "complication" was completely proposed as to provide a feeble reason to have a mislynch. Where I am sure of your role, I am unsure of your alignment and I don't think there's any room in my mind to accommodate any trust for you. Drake Marshal

Nope, it was just some basic deduction with the role I do have. Please hold me to this, I admittedly have nothing solid, but hold me to explain them (Don't really have time rn). Can the Elims forego their order and not kill anyone @A Joe in the Bush I have no idea how I missed that >.> Why are you leaning towards HH? Or myself? I realise I shouldn't place a vote yet lest another tie or such occurs, at least until I've given my reasons proper, HH

Caught up on thread. Pinging elim on @Hemalurgic Headshot, @Araris Valerian and @nutellaspren I can confirm @Drake Marshall is indeed telling the truth about his role, however despite the evidence of your villagerness I am a little skeptical of your play. My gut feels like something is up and all that stuff I said before was mainly to justify that and to defend myself from your vote (which still confuses me, you and @Seonid, so that doesn't help my feelings). You may not be the unstable misborn but whether you are an eliminator, I would not be surprised, specifically as the eliminators would want the mistborn dead as well, and a scan role would benefit that task immensely. My feelings on nutella confuse me and I am unsure how to gauge them but I'll ISO them and see if some stuff align. I will ISO HH and Araris later, but for now will place my vote on HH. Edit: *facepalm, I somehow forgot about N2 *shakes head Very interesting on that, I have no idea how I forgot to even post thoughts on it >.> Well I can assure you all I am not the mistborn and the riot was an attempt to implicate me. I also pinged badly on sart's post; It was a little 50/50 but then the end kind of threw me off.

Batman is in awe of you.

Omg you look like Tyler Joseph specially in that last one.

That's so awesome.

!! Welcome back Kestrel! Been missing you, have any awesome drawings to share?

*sigh... Mm thoughts up soon. Sorry @Droughtbringer I owe you one, even if it was just chance...

@Seonid You already claimed not to have much evidence against me.

What risk lol? There is barely any evidence to say that I am the Mistborn or Elim and yet here we are.

Mm just going to say I can determine whether Drought or Drake is evil tonight if I live *shrugs

*sigh

Bravo, 6 eliminators.

When I said lets stop playing games, I meant it.

Bruh could you tell me why you voted on me then labelled me a greater threat? But yeah, that whole thing was based around literally like the past couple pages in this thread, and after what Seonid brought up and seeing how you've been reacting, coupled with that you are apparently Seeker 2, shows me that your confidence stems from your role and deduction, which I can appreciate. And lets play no games, you were behaving like a mayor and heavily been insinuating that others follow your ideas. And let's roll back to the very definition of "dictate" shall we Yes, that is what you've been doing my good man. And your "authority" stems from your role and such. Regardless I have been convinced of your villagerness and agree with what others have said about Drought, who has been my second suspicion. Drake Drought. Oh and @Seonid, I am not the Mistborn and I don't believe there is sufficient, if any evidence to point anyone to that regard, so I would like to hear more on why you voted on me. Also @Steeldancer just poking you to ask how that analysis post is going. And guys, I think my response was more offensive than defensive, I didn't really defend myself did I even tho offense is the best defense. But the reason I was so offensive was because Drake was flippant with his vote on me and then stated that he had his eyes on a greater threat, while his vote was on me, which really rang off to me, which I also mentioned in my "defensive" response, and now that Drake hasn't decided to bestow reasoning on to my vote, and that Seonid too voted on me without much evidence prior to my "defensive" post. Araris I can understand, but to be fair I've only really been playing SE like this for a few games so, all this "suspicion" on me is based on my "defensive" responnse Which I think is ludicrous.

Sorry for being inactive guys, been busy with new year and just haven’t been in mindset for SE. Nah fam, I just get snarky and sarcastic when I’m impatient and get annoyed at other people for doing stupid things like wasting time with pokevotes, also just like being sarcastic, helps ignore insecurity xP And am I the only one that is getting off vibes from the way @Droughtbringer has been playing this game? Also the excuse of not wanting to lynch an inactive is a bit convenient, and not just for drought, but for other players too. Oh wait, cycle was extended ok. What made you change your mind? Ha that usually comes from a) Being confident in their alignment as a villager or b ) their confidence in acting a villager as an eliminator, which is a play @Amanuensis would often employ, just to give an example. Mm I don't really like the tone of his post here, "thinking out loud" isn't a very good ploy for a player in general to use, as it creates confusion, contradiction and as you have already said, you might change your mind. Now where do Eliminators thrive? Confusion. Easy to take advantage of, easy to foster. And if one was to advocate a lynch on Drakey here, using meta arguments and any concrete proof given would be easily contested by saying that it was merely said out loud, and that the stand had changed since then etc, lest to say people would be very conflicted in lynching Drake. Also "l'm becoming increasingly sure that your current vote is in the right place. Keeping your vote where it is would be a sound decision. I would follow suit, however I believe there is a larger threat to be reckoned with." See now, first, who are you to dictate what a sound decision is, second, wow you're really heavily insinuating that nuttela should do what you say, I would go as far as to say you are taking advantage of the fact nutella is new here and is, forgive me @nutellaspren, impressionable. lastly. So I'm the larger threat here am I? Well then, let's make that true, and to banish any misgivings people may have on advocating a lynch against you Drake, I have a question for them. How much do you trust someone who is clearly going to lengths to be important to us, not to mention borderline mayoring without even being confirmed town and generally fostering contradiction and such so that he may draw upon those points later on to add to confusion. Drake Marshal.

Something tells me the Computer could be a communist itself all things considered.

Just a tad bit pretentious little man. It's called sarcasm, social commentary if you will. You all were being idiots with the pokevoting. Gee thanks for the vote of confidence. If I was an elim I would be very happy at the disorganisedness of the lynch, honestly was a mess and I have no idea how we got an elim out of it. Unlucky for Asterion who got caught up in it. Sorry guys, not in a good place, haven't been for a bit so Imma try and get some coherent and actual analysis together tomorrow.

I love pokemon. Pokevotes are a close second.

Whyyyyyy What is wrong with you peeeoppplee xD

Am I the only one loving this typo?

Either way, we learn more from lynching either Road or Walin. Road to see if he's lying, Walin to see what he's hidin

Guys we have 12 hours to pick a lynch target. So, I'm just going to decide someone that doesn't deserve to be lynched. But would be fun to. Let's find out then if the Roadwalker is one to be trusted

I like you, mm very close to speaking the ideals, Windrunner I think. I agree with all of this. Well, a bit early for conclusive reads but regardless, For the lynch, it is clear to all villagers I hope what would come out as elimy, in a situation where a lynch is necessary and there are no solid leads. I played a Mafiauniverse game where I was forced to use that "strategy". It doesn't work, I'll go deeper into it if you want but I'm tired. Mm, if you're going to do that please try and interact more with the thread, it will help your reads and analysis substantially. Just doing that won't honestly, to me, be much worth unless it is pure rationalisation.