Jump to content

Amanuensis

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5932

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Amanuensis

  1. Amanuensis
    Hello biplet, I am Adavantos, not Amanuensis, just Adavantos, that's all
  2. Amanuensis
    Just unconditional orders and counterfactual orders.
  3. Amanuensis
    Try Referee
  4. Amanuensis
    As a notorious troll myself, I find it all in good fun and thus immune
  5. Amanuensis
    Thankfully, I'm immune to being trolled
  6. Amanuensis
    \o/ _o_ \o/ _o_ \o/
  7. Amanuensis
    Whoops
  8. Amanuensis
    I got a semi weird claim for you. My role has something to do with the World Cup
  9. Amanuensis
    @Orlok Tsubodai Who are you and what have you done with the real Brolok?
  10. Amanuensis
    I take responsibility for all shenanigans
  11. Amanuensis
    For the Cult of the Salmon Meerkat!
  12. Amanuensis
    Wait. 10PM EST tonight or tomorrow??? ED1T: Cause to me that looks like the game starts in 2 hours o.o
  13. Amanuensis
    Something something Kas something something
  14. Amanuensis
    Please please please please please, yes.
  15. Amanuensis
    Bruh I literally just did and somehow missed that one line
  16. Amanuensis
    Welcome to the bloodshed, then!
  17. Amanuensis
    You can join the game or spectate it to learn how these are played. Spectators get access to a Google doc to discuss the game while players get assigned roles and alignments tomorrow. The game is hosted here. @Kasimir are PMs in this game?
  18. Amanuensis
    Hear, hear!
  19. Amanuensis
    Call me Aman. ED1T: Or better yet, I'll sign up as Adavantos. @Kasimir
  20. Amanuensis
    Could do a 'single inner circle member is a spy' type deal too, so killing that spy gives the inner circle a safe doc afterwards.
  21. Amanuensis
    TBH I feel like it'd be a fair strat for the IC members to invent a fictional Codename/Persona and communicate with themselves in different tabs, just to throw the elims off.
  22. Amanuensis
    Oh and now that I just read the docs, I wanted to apologize again for my C3 episode. I thought logging off for the night would be enough to let myself chill out first, but then when I got around to actually explain my side of C2, I still ended up delivering it too charged with emotion. The point then was not to avoid getting voted out, I want that to be clear, just to not to have my word constantly dismissed (big trigger). Especially after, when I was less adrenalized, I was able to see that the data I presented could have been done so in a way divided from emotion that should've been compelling enough on it's own. Of course, yada yada bipolar, but my mental health should not play a role in these games at all, and realistically it's my job alone to deal with it, not for y'all to walk around me on broken glass and eggshells. I do feel this was a step in the right direction from the LG84 meltdown, so when the next time my neurodivergency clashes with these games, I think it won't be an issue so much as I'm more likely to just ghost the game for as long as it takes for me to be in the right state again. I'm also going to make it a rule for myself not to Self-Vote or use ALL CAPS FOR EMPHASIS. It's just anti-fun.
  23. Amanuensis
    I do almost feel like IC should outnumber the elims? Maybe by 1 or 2? Even if we had flipped TUN instead of Hael, we would have lost. I feel like with 4 elims especially, the game was more or less guaranteed to end in a draw or e-win. I say that because elims can't die to the NK but IC can die to both the execution and the NK + the smaller the player list gets the easier finding IC's becomes (given the fact elims don't factor themselves while villagers have to factor everyone) Would be neat if the IC had a NK of their own to discuss/vote for in doc, maybe? Honestly IC members having roles in general could be a good play. Perhaps a list of options and some kind of limitation, like a single option can only be used 1x per cycle by a single ICguy, perhaps with a limited number of uses (3x?) per option in the game. ED1T: Perhaps then, IC members don't exactly discuss who they are using actions on or who they suspect, but more strategize on how to use what abilities and when, and be like "Yo I'm using one of the protects tonight!" And actually don't use it at all to mislead the elims
  24. Amanuensis
    Wow. Honestly what a game. Def going to look back on this one fondly I want to say excellent work to @NerdyAarakocra @Ookla the Unknown @The Bookwyrm @InfiniteInsanity and @ExoticAlmond All of you did great jobs convincing me you were village, while some of you did it while also thoroughly stomping the village into the dust! Well done! Nerdy, sorry again for not standing by my v!read for you earlier. Honestly I blame the Xino NK for that. Holy crud what. Literally ever player active at C2 EoD was village than, eh? Who woulda thunk it! This is the first game I'm happy to have lost so absolutely. Also Archer glad you enjoyed being a recipient of one of my patented Aman Is Going Insane And Doesn't Know What Else To Do But Troll Vote ED1T: Oh and @Szeth_Pancakes tyvm for making this happen. Please do consider Wiznik being able to add one player into the IC for a rerun ED2T: Also ty @Haelbarde for continuing to gather and present data until the very end. It really was a case that whenever you were around and in thread I v!read you, then when you disappeared and everyone else was talking, I ended up v!reading them and dropping you back down haha. Stick also did great at proving themselves imo. Really was just the confidence in at least 1 of us being evil that messed us up. That and Xino replicating his e!meta
  25. Amanuensis
    TUN idk anymore gnight
×
×
  • Create New...