little wilson
-
Posts
2831 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by little wilson
-
Lemon. Rae. Also, I vehemently disagree with the claim that Lemon's actions are NAI. She's participating in the MR a fair bit, providing reads and everything over there, but not even bothering to do so here. Ever wonder why that might be?
-
This is Lemon's 4th game, and she's playing the MR, which is her 5th. She also almost single-handedly solved QF26. I wouldn't advise underestimating her abilities.
-
Tsk tsk, Orlok. You missed one: Also, Lemon.
-
I'm not dead until the writeup says that I'm dead. I'm not going to go completely inactive on Wyrm like that. I've talked to him, and there's a reason Alv made that post earlier. Yes, I lost the desire to play, but that was mostly because the vast majority of reasons for people's suspicions is entirely ridiculous since it's predicated on my changing playstyle (not everyone's but most). Well, let's actually look at this for half-a-second: We should be promoting people trying different playstyles. Sometimes, massively different playstyles. Sometimes, that attempt is going to go poorly. Sometimes, that person who tries a massively different playstyle will decide partway into the game that they're losing interest in the game because of their playstyle. This leaves them with two choices: 1. Change the playstyle and stay active. 2. Go inactive. We've seen players get in this position before. Guess what happens most of the time? THEY GO INACTIVE. Then people get upset, because inactivity is a problem. But people get EQUALLY UPSET if a player's playstyle shifts. So, what should a player in this situation do? That's a question for everyone, by the way. What's the right play there? Is there a right play there? Because based on all of your reactions, it honestly doesn't seem like there is. Damned if one does, damned if one doesn't. This is not conducive to promoting new playstyles. This is the antithesis. Lastly, I said I'd rather die than go inactive. I didn't die. And certain players have not allowed me to go inactive, coupled with my talking to Wyrm about this. So stop calling me effectively dead, Rae. You tried to kill someone you were convinced was a villager, and now you're promoting terribly anti-villager strategies. Village Rae doesn't say or do what you are doing, but that's okay, because you're not village. You're one of Lemon's converts, along with PK, and probably Araris (though possibly Seonid. I'm leaning towards Araris though).
-
Wilson. I'd rather die than go inactive and since deviating from my very different playstyle has merely garnered me suspicion, I've rather lost all desire to play this game. So death is preferable. I will not be saying anything else in the thread or in PMs. Good luck, village. I hope you can solve this, but I'm done.
-
Having a Bad Day?: Get 'yer Hugs here!!
little wilson replied to Curious Anamaximder's topic in General Discussion
Short explanation for bad day: Today, I found out that my name was given to a debt collector. Not only is the reason for it an utter lie (Comcast is terrible, by the way), but I was never even warned in the first place. Longer explanation: a few months ago, one of my roommates moved out. She was in charge of the internet. We switched it over into my name, and a week later, when Xfinity was stupid again, I scheduled a Google Fiber installation for the following week. Once that was installed, I called Comcast and cancelled. I'd already looked online and known that it's really hard to cancel services with Comcast, because their customer service reps are trained not to let people cancel unless the person is moving out of the country or they're dead. So I lied and said I was moving out of the country (to New Zealand to be specific. I even had a story lined up and everything, if they asked me. It was a very well-thought-out lie). The rep was super nice and cancelled it without a problem and wished me luck on my move, and also issued a reimbursement for my last payment, since I was cancelling asap, and therefore, I'd overpaid. He told me everything I needed to gather, and where I needed to drop it off. I gathered everything up, put it all in a box, took a few pictures, and drove over to the Comcast store. Waited over 30 minutes since they were freaking busy, and finally turned it in. Did not take a picture at the counter, because I didn't have a good chance to, but I got a receipt for it. I left, thinking I was all done. The rep on the phone had been nice. I thought I'd escaped Comcast unscathed. I was wrong. I never did receive the reimbursement, for one. But two, I got an email this morning from a collections agency, telling me that I had unreturned equipment from Comcast. It only totals $80, and that's on the pretty low end for Comcast unreturned equipment, but still. It's supposedly two $40 mini cable boxes. We had one in the apartment, which I returned (and the rep never even said I had to return that one, and he definitely didn't mention three of them). What I think happened is that Comcast saw that it's a three story townhouse and put it down as three cable boxes - one for each floor - but never actually installed all three, because they couldn't. My apartment doesn't have the right wiring between the floors for it/the wiring would take a hella long time to figure out, since it's daisy-chained between the floors (the Google Fiber guy explained this to me when he was installing Fiber, since I would've liked to get ethernet in my room in the bsaement, but it would've taken him hours to only possibly figure it out, due to how stupidly the wiring was done). So I'm pretty sure Comcast either unintentionally or intentionally put 3 of these in their installation for us and since I only returned one, they're showing the other two as unreturned. But they never even tried to contact me about it. No mail, no email. No nothing. Until this morning. From a freaking debt collector. Who is now calling me and getting blocked, thanks to my spam-blocker app. And I really don't want to pay them for something we didn't have, but I also really don't want my credit messed with because my credit score is excellent and I've worked hard to get it this good. I know there are potential legal routes I can take, but I also don't have the money for a lawyer. I freaking hate Comcast right now. -
Would've been in the writeup. The person attacked probably wouldn't have been mentioned, but I'm certain the writeup would indicate that a deflected attack had taken place. Another point in favor of Jondesu being evil is this: I rather think that's a tongue-in-cheek confession. They didn't kill because they were doing other things.
-
Was it? See, Rae pointing out that the last evil game she remembers for me was AG3 got me looking at the spreadsheet a little closer. And here are all the games we've played together: LG28 - the Nalthis game in the Awakened house with a Traitor random conversion. Both of us were good. I was attacked cycle 4 but didn't die until Cycle 8, and you were attacked and killed cycle 5. I was also played that game very similarly to how I'm playing this one. The initial plan with Khaos was actually pretty similar to the initial plan with Jaina, and I discarded the Khaos playstyle right around the time I got attacked. AG3 - I was evil and you were good. We attacked you cycle 3 but you didn't die until cycle 15. I had a pretty impassioned playstyle that entire game and was pretty vocal throughout, if memory serves me. LG32 - The LG2 rerun with a converting eliminator. I was good, and while you started good, you got converted, and I promptly caught you and lead your lynch. LG33 - The LG18 rerun taking place in the KKC world at the University. Both of us were good. You were sabotaged cycle 5 and ended up in the Crockery, never to break out. I was killed cycle 3. LG35 - the Les Mis game. You were good. I was neutral. You died cycle 1. LG38 - not exactly a standard game by any sense of the term, so irrelevant in this case QF26 - also not a standard game in any sense, and I died cycle 1 anyway. So to sum up: We've played 7 games. I have been evil in 1 of them. You have been evil in 1 of them. We have been good in 2 of them. And the last 3 games were either non-standard or I was neutral and therefore my play is NAI. Let me reiterate: You have no idea how I play when I'm evil. You've seen me evil once, and I was not using the same playstyle then as I am now (you're free to go back and check to verify). I do find it interesting that you've completely forgotten the one game - the first game we played together - that most closely resembles my current playstyle though. Ironically, from another Wyrm game and a game with a conversion. Yeah, my suspicion of you is definitely warranted. Your suspicion makes literally no sense and is not backed up by reality or fact at all. Jondesu.
-
Well, that's the last game I was evil in, so there isn't anything more recent than that for me being evil. And the last relatively normal game I played where I wasn't neutral was LG 33, so....been a while since that too.
-
Oh, also remember that occasionally (like in LG38), I try a more hands-off, fun playstyle only to have it fall apart on me a few cycles into the game, because there are things I want to say that I cannot say through the hands-off, fun playstyle. This doesn't mean that anything has changed. It just means that I've given up suppressing that desire to say things. Yes, I've done this as an eliminator occasionally. If you were to look through my past games, though, I think you'd find I do it even more as a villager. Top of my suspect list: Jondesu, for twisting things in an attempt to have me killed. How cruel. And manipulative (ironic, considering that you're saying I'm the one being manipulative). I may be fine with dying, but that doesn't mean I'm not going to look askance at the people pushing my death. I hope you don't mind. Also @Araris Valerian, yes. But....does this mean you also suspect me? Because I'm not gonna lie, if that's true, that does kind of sting just a bit. I don't know why, because I know Orlok is slightly paranoid of me, but not overly so. I'm going to hope you mean that you've been in enough docs with me and have a decent enough read to know that I'm being honest right now.
-
I'm literally not even going to fight any lynch because it amuses me so much. And yes. I know that all you paranoid peeps will think I'm saying this as manipulation to get you not to lynch me, but I'm not. I know, I know, you can't believe me or trust anything I say because you think I'm evil and will say anything to not die, including saying that I won't say anything. And this is just more of an indicator that you really don't know me or my playstyle, if you legitimately think this and listen to it. But that's fine. I only ask one thing: remember this. Remember me saying this. Please. When I die and I'm village, remember that I wasn't trying to manipulate.
-
You really haven't played enough games with me to know my village vs elim play. I've heard I have a tell, but it's certainly not aggression and the people who know the tell don't even play games anymore. But if you'd like to lynch me, you're quite free to try. I've never actually been lynched as a villager so this should be a new experience.
-
Yes, because eliminators have never claimed to be suspicious of teammates before. I'm sorry. Let me just remove my vote from you. >>
-
If it makes you feel any better, I'm not suspicious of you for just the tinfoil. My suspicion started shortly after your post about PK during the night. @Arinian was that question directed at me? I don't have much. It's predicated almost entirely on my suspicion of Sart. Last night, Rae PMed me asking for my thoughts on Sart's activity, and since I'd just been talking to a couple others about how Sart looked really evil for that post at the start of the night, I told her I was pretty convinced he'd been converted, and that I also thought PK might be the Seer. Rae did not respond, but later in the night, she posted in the thread about suspecting PK of being the Seer and then voted on him during the day and asked another question about him in a PM. To me, this reads as deflection. I'm suspicious of Sart, but I'm also suspicious of PK. If Rae and Sart are both evil, Rae would want to promote my PK suspicion to help her teammate survive for a little longer. So why is Rae the Seer in my theory? Well, I still think Sart was converted. Which means that if they are elim teammates, Rae can only be the Seer, since there were only a max of two elims at that point in time.
-
That's kind of what I'm doing with the Sart lynch. If he's evil, her consistent deflection from Sart to PK and village-reading Sart looks much worse and if there's a Coinshot, they could hit her and take away one of her atium beads. I'm more sure of Sart than I am of Rae. If I'm wrong about that, then Rae might not be evil. Maybe. If Sart is evil, Rae is almost certainly evil as well.
-
Current theory: Rae is the Seer, Sart is the first convert, and Lemenelon is the second convert.
-
I made this announcement of my own volition, because I'd been informed of the results via PM earlier. I didn't announce it earlier because not only was there not any real reason to (PK only had one vote on him) but announcing it immediately would make it easier to find my contact. The second vote on PK with so few votes on anyone else is what got me to announce it now. Would you rather I'd waited until PK was lynched? Would that have been better? I'm of the opinion that the more information people have, the better it is, and I felt it would be best to let the people voting on him know. You seem rather thirsty for PK's blood, Rae. You sure there's not a more nefarious reason for that? Because I'm really starting to think you might be evil.
-
Really? I thought it was a classic seeker. Full disclosure: I haven't actually read the rules for roles (though Wyrm assured me the roles were normal other than the Seer, so I'm going to blame this on him. Yep. ). If that's the case, then yeah. He's not the Seer, though since I'd thought he was the Seer knowing he was scanned as not is useful, if only for me.
-
Personally, I think the steeldancer kill was done because he'd just said he would be completely inactive for a few turns, which is different than most others, who'd said they would be less active. A contribution crusade kill like this from the eliminator team would only come from a handful of people, most of whom are long-running R&R players. Oh, also, I've heard it through the grapevine that PK was scanned as village last night.
-
Jaina thinks that Sart character is way sketch. I mean, look at how he tacked on another vote for Joe: which lead to Joe getting lynched, simply because Joe was joking around, which is what a fair number of players (including Jaina herself) were doing. Sure, Sart says it's a weak argument, but it doesn't even feel like he's trying. He's just going after an easy target. Because he wants someone, anyone, to die. And then after Joe died: he also feel disingenuous. He also feels super eliminator-y. Jaina's panda doesn't like him. And that's enough for Jaina. Sart.
-
I think I'm going to call you Roz from now on. It's a good name.
-
So Wednesday? Sounds like that's the best day for everyone.
-
Sigh. All this talk about Joe's and bushes and mugs with things in it is making my fingers itch to draw. But I will not give in to the pressure. However. *raises hand* Is the blood of a joey too macabre?
-
This week won't work for me for sure. Next week is better, though I also won't be available next Friday. The week after that is completely free right now to my knowledge.
-
Conversion games should never have a hub of information. I feel like that should be kind of obvious.
