Jump to content

Lightning

Members
  • Posts

    250
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Lightning

  1. 39 minutes ago, CaptainRyan said:

    1. I would keep the original ending to "Words of Radiance".

    2. Kill someone (relatively) important in the Stormlight Archive and have them stay dead. Dalinar, Jasnah, Renarin, Adolin, or Elhokar would be the list I would choose from (in order of most recommended to least recommended).

    3. Postpone (or cancel) the Apocalypse Guard series and focus on Warbreaker 2 and Elantris 2 instead. [Not a huge fan of the Reckoners series.]

    This next one is not about SA but...
    4. I would ask him to somehow fix the travesty that is "Shadows of Self". [For a number of reasons I will not get into in this thread.]

     

    Note: I just want to reiterate that these are simply my ideas and I am not making definitive statements about what is good/bad writing.

    I strongly agree with #1 and #3.  I mostly agree with #2.  As for #4, I found Bands of Morning so good that I can ignore the problems from the previous book.

  2. 2 hours ago, Calderis said:

    In the case of personal harm though I believe that this is an over reaction rooted in both bitterness, and the inability to separate the harm inflicted by individuals and/or particular subsets of belief, from the concept of belief as a whole. 

    Yes!  I would have given your post 10 up votes just for that sentence.  (The rest was great too!)

  3. This topic is very dear to my heart.  To give some context, I believe in God and through personal experiences have come to know him better, and I want everyone else to similarly know the joy that comes from seeking him.  I also see the good many people do in varied religious or non-religious traditions.  For instance, I appreciate the sentiment expressed by Calderis, which I might sum up as "Be a builder not a demolisher."  I had a few further thoughts on the topic.  I hope people find them helpful.

    1. Calderis, you wrote: "Anti-theists anger me greatly."  I understand that sentiment (believe me, I do!), but perhaps I can help turn that anger to something more productive -- understanding.  With understanding comes the ability to see why people act how they do, and often this allows us to respond in more helpful ways.  The key, you might be surprised, lies in what you said earlier, namely that you are "content to let others have their own beliefs as long as said beliefs are not causing direct harm."

    Anti-theists believe that religion is a direct harm, because they believe it is a deception.  They believe it is the perpetuation of a lie.  In some cases they know, from their own personal experience, of harm done to themselves and to others, and of lies taught to them.  This is part of the reason they act so aggressively to tear down the institution that so harmed them, in their view.

    I think that's one of the key reasons people often clash about religion.  They see things in such different ways.  The Jew sees male circumcision of infants as a sacred ceremony commanded by God, while atheists (and some theists) see it as direct physical harm.  The atheist sees teaching that there is no God as enlightening others, while the believer sees that as leading souls astray.

    Remembering this context can often help us see one another more clearly.  And it takes a lot of work to step back since these issues are often some of the most poignant and emotional issues we deal with.  To give a personal example, it hurts me every time I hear someone casually use God's name as a swear-word, because I know that if I spoke that way it would be a despicable act of desecration.  I have to remember that those who do this are not me, and don't have the same experiences and beliefs that I do.  That doesn't mean I still don't like it.  It just means I can calmly say "Please don't use his name like that."

    2. I like the Marcus Aurelius quote.  It has many good points:  Live a good life!  God is only worthy of worship if he is a benevolent and righteous being himself.

    It also implicitly raises the question: Why bother seeking God in this life, if [as we hope] we will find out in the next life all about him?

    Let me give a few reasons I think it is a worthy goal, perhaps even the most important endeavor we can perform in this life, to seek to know God.

    First, it is difficult to live a good life, and we need all the help we can get.  I can't tell you how many times I've been impressed to make changes in my life, sometimes being given direct advice, especially with respect to helping my children.

    Second, as we come to know God we can have peace and surety.  As others mentioned above, the thought of ceasing to exist is terrifying.  The current cosmology put forward by modern science is that the universe will eventually expand to the point where atoms cannot stick together.  That's a scary thought!   All human records gone.  All life gone.  To put it in cosmere terminology, it is as if science is saying "Ruin will eventually win." There is real hope in believing and knowing. 

    -----------------------

    To sum up:  I appreciate this topic, and the desire to build stronger bonds with each other.  Even if we don't agree on everything, I believe we can find important places where we do agree.  And even when we don't agree on things we think are the (most!) important things, I hope we can recognize that this does not mean the other person is therefore evil.

  4. 29 minutes ago, Fedi said:

    I'm from Italy, but currently live in Switzerland and will probably soon move to the Netherlands - so a bit from all over the place! I guess maybe I could look up Brandon's books in Italian, though I usually read everything in English and have no problem. I wouldn't know if Brandon has a big following in Italy, but short of one or two people he is not read by people I know. It's better in Switzerland.

    Was it your first time in Europe? Did you like it?

    It was my third time in Europe.  The other two times were centered in Poland only.

    I do like Europe.  Definitely greener than where I'm from in the U.S. (namely Utah).  I also like the food.  Polish food is hearty, and the Belgian/French food was nice because I don't often get fish at home.  The only hard part for me is being away from my family (and my wife doesn't like to travel so she doesn't come with me!).

  5. 22 minutes ago, Fedi said:

    Thank you @Shadows4Silence! It's very nice to be welcomed here :3

    @Lightning, you're right. Every author (especially one as prolific as Brandon) has very different titles to offer. I know for a fact that fantasy is my thing, but it's such a broad category that I am bound to dislike something. I actually read the first lines of the first Mistborn book, once! It's a sad and funny story at the same time; you see, I'm not an English mothertongue speaker, and somehow I read "Ash" as if it would be a name. So this poor guy Ash is falling from the sky and Lord Tresting simply frowns?

    I was very confused... and then I felt like an idiot

    What part of Europe are you from?  I just got back from visiting Poland, France, and Belgium for work.  I know Brandon has a big following in Poland (and his books have been translated to Polish) but I don't know about some of the other languages over there.

  6. Maybe this will help: you will certainly dislike something Brandon has written!  I'm a huge Brandon Sanderson fan, but every author has stuff that just doesn't work for some people.

    Give something a try, and if you don't like it so be it.  I'd recommend you start with the first Mistborn book.  It could be that fantasy is just not your thing, but you'll never know until you try.

  7. Let me say again, I think Biblioden should be on this list.

    He sunk an entire continent.  He has enslaved half the planet.  He is the leader of an evil cult, who themselves are afraid of him.

    He doesn't suffer from any mental illnesses, or as far as we know have other mitigating circumstance, to his actions.  He is quite "rational" in his evil, but even his reasons for choosing evil are despicable.

    He quite readily will perform human sacrifice to get what he wants.

  8. I have a question about Ruin's body.  We know that part of his body was converted into atium.

    Was the the well of ascension continually taking more of the body of Ruin and feeding it into the system that turned it into atium?

    Or was the atium limited to the part of Ruin cut off when he was initially trapped?  If so, does that mean atium would have eventually been completely stored by the kandra (if Ruin had stayed trapped in the well)?  Did Ruin reclaim part of his body (that wasn't yet atium) when he was released?

  9. 10 minutes ago, The One Who Connects said:

    Oh boy... The answer to this question is "there are a lot"

    In no particular order, there are people on here suspecting:

    • Liss (Assassin meeting with Jasnah in WoR Prologue, May have still been in Kholinar at the time)
    • Chana (Herald of Dustbringers, started as a "Liss is Chana" theory that branched out)
    • Lone Greedy Diagrammist (No specific Guesses, but they'd have to be high up to know what an Honorblade could do)
    • Diagrammist under Orders (Taravangian may count as a main character knowing, so it's up for debate)
    • Bordin (Dalinar's agent in Kholinar for unknown reasons at the time, Brought Taln to the Warcamps)
    • Shalash (Herald of Lightweavers, her "No Shardblade" comment was before Taln arrived)
    • The Skybreakers (People think they're hoarding the Lost Shardblades from the Recreance)
    • Amaram (His "precious cargo" comment, semi-disproved/doubted)
    • The Ghostbloods (With exception to Extesian's comment 4 hrs ago, I don't think they have ever been under suspicion for this)

    Any others that I've missed?


    I personally favor it being Liss, but we'll have to wait and see if we get more answers(or suspects) in Oathbringer

    You missed one.  Isn't it possible that Taln still has it?

  10. On 2/8/2017 at 4:03 PM, Silverblade5 said:

    So, I did some math recently, and came up with the following information:

    cos(2 * x) = 2cos^2(x) - 1

    cos(2^2 * x) =  2(2cos^2(x) - 1)^2 - 1

    cos(2^3 * x) = 2(2(2cos^2(x) - 1)^2 - 1)^2 - 1

    cos(2^4 * x) = 2(2(2(2cos^2(x) - 1)^2 - 1)^2 - 1)^2 - 1

    Anyway I might be able to condense this into a series representation for cos(2^a * x)?

    @Chaos@Glamdring804 Since you're my go to people for calc advice

    This certainly can be expanded into a huge polynomial in cos(x), however there is a better way.

    One can express cosine in terms of the exponential function.  This has many upsides (including making it easier to derive identities).  The one downside is it involves the imaginary number i.

    The formula is: cos(x) = (e^(ix) + e^(-ix))/2.  The formula for sine is: sin(x) = (e^(ix) - e^(-ix))/(2i).

    Thus, the quantity you are looking at is simply:

    cos(2^a * x) = (e^(2^a i x) + e^(-2^a i x))/2.

    This has only two terms; you don't want to expand it as above, because it is already quite simple.  Just two exponentials.

  11. I must be a Sanderfan, because I really liked the short story.  That night I had a fun dream, where my mind filled in an end to the story.  It really captured my imagination.  I can understand why Brandon said it wasn't very good-- but it drew me in.

    Here is a possible endings I thought up that would be fun twists.

    The girl is really a hologram.  The company can't find any real people to interact with Petr.

    Thoughts?

  12. 1 hour ago, Yitzi2 said:

    Very low, as its effect on them was almost certainly negative, and they were too far away for it to be plausible that they caused it unintentionally.

    Are you so sure?  Remember how the Ire are pumping investiture in from somewhere?  The Reod may have been an (accidental) side-effect of their meddling.

    That said, you are probably right!  :-p

  13. Things that didn't surprise me:

    The idea of a snapshot inside a snapshot.

    The girl who gave the phone-number being from the "real" world.

    Things that did surprise me:

    That I was right it was a snapshot inside a snapshot.  I was hoping the characters would be real after all, enough to ignore my gut feeling.

    That the big reveal at the end is snapshots really are not real.  That seriously bothered me.  But I suppose it might be even worse if they were real...

    That Davis was planning a murder.

    Things I still have questions about:

    Was it ever explained why that one group of victims was poisoned?

×
×
  • Create New...