Jump to content

Is There Free Will In The Cosmere?


Guest Coda

Recommended Posts

So, the determinism vs free will argument is still going strong, so I came up with a question. <see title> 

IS THERE FREE WILL IN THE COSMERE? 

So everything has a soul, which is the free will argument, but does the existence of a soul dictate free will if even a rock has free will? Then again, the ability of the Stick to resist Soulcasting again implies free will. Next!

Prophecy. Renarin's capability to foresee false events shows that there are false futures, so there are other futures. Of course, this could be him just being wrong about the one, singular future. 

As of yet, I have not actually determined whether or not there is free will in the Cosmere, so I would love to know what the brightest Cosmerian scholars have to say. Sharders, do your worst. Or best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Coda said:

So, the determinism vs free will argument is still going strong, so I came up with a question. <see title> 

IS THERE FREE WILL IN THE COSMERE?

There absolutely is. All futuresight, including atium, is best off of probability and can be changed. 

Gold allomancy shows that alternate pasts exist as well. 

13 minutes ago, Coda said:

So everything has a soul, which is the free will argument, but does the existence of a soul dictate free will if even a rock has free will? Then again, the ability of the Stick to resist Soulcasting again implies free will. Next!

The Cognitive aspects of objects are are constructs built by the perception of living things. Soulcasting is a practiced art because any substrate can be learned to be manipulated. They don't truly have a "will" so much as a set function that can be manipulated. Stick, the ship, a rock. If you know how you can make all of them change easily. Shallan is just bad at Soulcasting. 

16 minutes ago, Coda said:

Prophecy. Renarin's capability to foresee false events shows that there are false futures, so there are other futures. Of course, this could be him just being wrong about the one, singular future. 

Again, see atium. We have watched the future actively changed by Vin. It is not deterministic. This is exactly what split atium shadows from conflicted users are. Fracturing lines of probability. 

On a meta level, of course its deterministic because it's traveling to and endpoint that Brandon's decided. But in world? Everything is malleable. Nothing is certain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I forgot about atium. But was there ever a probable future or was it just an alternate timeline? The multiverse theory doesn't disprove an unalterable timeline. Are those visions just reflections of other worlds that would have been?

Think about free will as "Did you actually choose?" Peoples' personalities dictate their choices, and their personalities are dictated by their experiences, which are beyond their control. Vin "chose" to burn atium, but she did that because of her education by Kelsier who chose to do that because...

What is the evidence for free will?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Coda when she didn't have atium, and used Zane's view of the future to change it. She reacted to his actions using atium and changed what would happen. In his vision, when she reacted, the shadow split.

She altered the course that the "future" said she would take. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But was that her free will? Again, the deterministic argument is that the actions of the individual are caused entirely by external forces. Maybe the atium shadows are the probable actions of an individual in alternate, fixed timelines that are similar to the Cosmerian one. You are probably right though. Your points just destroy mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Coda said:

But was that her free will? Again, the deterministic argument is that the actions of the individual are caused entirely by external forces. Maybe the atium shadows are the probable actions of an individual in alternate, fixed timelines that are similar to the Cosmerian one.

That is actually a thing that the man himself disconfirmed:

Quote

Brandon Sanderson

I wanted to avoid multi-verse theory type things in the Cosmere, in part because the Wheel of Time delved into these concepts, and even before working on the WoT was looking for ways to keep the Cosmere distinctive from it.

Beyond that, multiverses (along with time travel) really play havoc with continuity. I felt the cosmere was stronger if I kept to the three Realms--that's complex enough. Assume that in the cosmere, while different possible futures/pasts do branch (and can be seen) things like Allomantic gold are NOT looking at other realities--and there is only one reality, once events actually occur.

This does mean that time travel into the past is not going to be a factor in the cosmere.

This separation does let me divide these concepts off and play with them in other realms (like the Reckoners) where they're 'quarantined' so to speak.

Skyward Pre-Release AMA (Oct. 12, 2018)

 

Edited by Elegy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Chaos locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...