Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
55 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

Kelsier?

Nope

50 minutes ago, Thaidakar Lord of Scars said:

is it Kaladin?

Nope

47 minutes ago, Brightness Windrunner said:

Venli?

Nope

14 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Waxillium.

Nope

Not Kelsier
Not Kaladin
Not Venli
Not Waxillium

1. This character indirectly caused the death of a character they cared for.
2. This character is of mixed heritage.

Posted
1 minute ago, Marukka said:

Nope

Nope

Nope

Nope

Not Kelsier
Not Kaladin
Not Venli
Not Waxillium

1. This character indirectly caused the death of a character they cared for.
2. This character is of mixed heritage.

Shallan.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Thaidakar Lord of Scars said:

Shallan.

Nope

Not Kelsier
Not Kaladin
Not Venli
Not Waxillium
Not Shallan

1. This character indirectly caused the death of a character they cared for.
2. This character is of mixed heritage.
3. This character's significant other killed the significant other of a character this character had killed.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Marukka said:

Nope

Not Kelsier
Not Kaladin
Not Venli
Not Waxillium
Not Shallan

1. This character indirectly caused the death of a character they cared for.
2. This character is of mixed heritage.
3. This character's significant other killed the significant other of a character this character had killed.

Breeze?

Posted
Just now, Thaidakar Lord of Scars said:

Breeze?

Nope

Not Kelsier
Not Kaladin
Not Venli
Not Waxillium
Not Shallan
Not Breeze

1. This character indirectly caused the death of a character they cared for.
2. This character is of mixed heritage.
3. This character's significant other killed the significant other of a character this character had killed.
4. This character talkes to inanimate objects...

Posted
Just now, Marukka said:

Nope

Not Kelsier
Not Kaladin
Not Venli
Not Waxillium
Not Shallan
Not Breeze

1. This character indirectly caused the death of a character they cared for.
2. This character is of mixed heritage.
3. This character's significant other killed the significant other of a character this character had killed.
4. This character talkes to inanimate objects...

Vasher? I dunno I have not read war breaker.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Thaidakar Lord of Scars said:

Vasher? I dunno I have not read war breaker.

Nope

Not Kelsier
Not Kaladin
Not Venli
Not Waxillium
Not Shallan
Not Breeze
Not Vasher (no one else from Warbreaker either, but give it a read anyway, it's real fun!)

1. This character indirectly caused the death of a character they cared for.
2. This character is of mixed heritage.
3. This character's significant other killed the significant other of a character this character had killed.
4. This character talkes to inanimate objects...
5. ...with surprising consequences.

Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, Marukka said:

Nope

Not Kelsier
Not Kaladin
Not Venli
Not Waxillium
Not Shallan
Not Breeze
Not Vasher (no one else from Warbreaker either, but give it a read anyway, it's real fun!)

1. This character indirectly caused the death of a character they cared for.
2. This character is of mixed heritage.
3. This character's significant other killed the significant other of a character this character had killed.
4. This character talkes to inanimate objects...
5. ...with surprising consequences.

Adolin! And does #1 refer to Sureblood?

Edited by ElMonoEstupendo
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Adolin!

Of course it's him! :D

The stage is yours, very well deserved after I stole this round from under you (I would have not guessed Elantrian, was a bit stuck on the fused...). Sorry 'bout that. :unsure:

Edit: Yes, #1 referes to Sureblood. It had to be a bit more obscure so no one would guess Adolin right away.

Edited by Marukka
Posted
1 hour ago, Marukka said:

Of course it's him! :D

The stage is yours, very well deserved after I stole this round from under you (I would have not guessed Elantrian, was a bit stuck on the fused...). Sorry 'bout that. :unsure:

Damn good clues and organization!

Posted
14 hours ago, Marukka said:

Of course it's him! :D

The stage is yours, very well deserved after I stole this round from under you (I would have not guessed Elantrian, was a bit stuck on the fused...). Sorry 'bout that. :unsure:

Edit: Yes, #1 referes to Sureblood. It had to be a bit more obscure so no one would guess Adolin right away.

Noice.

  1. This character goes looking for trouble.
Posted
1 hour ago, AonEne said:

Kelsier 

 

1 hour ago, Robin Hatter said:

Wax?

 

33 minutes ago, Marukka said:

Axies

Not Kelsier.
Not Wax.
Not Axies.

  1. This character goes looking for trouble.
  2. This character has a circle of confidantes.
Posted
43 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

 

Not Kelsier.
Not Wax.
Not Axies.

  1. This character goes looking for trouble.
  2. This character has a circle of confidantes.

Shallan 

Posted
1 hour ago, AonEne said:

Vin 

 

44 minutes ago, Marukka said:

Shallan 

 

25 minutes ago, Robin Hatter said:

Sarene?

Not Vin.
Not Shallan.
Not Sarene.
Not Kelsier.
Not Wax.
Not Axies.

  1. This character goes looking for trouble.
  2. This character has a circle of confidantes.
  3. This character dabbles in architecture.
Posted
59 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

 

Not Vin.
Not Shallan.
Not Sarene.
Not Kelsier.
Not Wax.
Not Axies.

  1. This character goes looking for trouble.
  2. This character has a circle of confidantes.
  3. This character dabbles in architecture.

Dalinar?

Posted
1 hour ago, AceBassMan said:

Dalinar?

Not Dalinar, but I like the reminder.
Not Vin.
Not Shallan.
Not Sarene.
Not Kelsier.
Not Wax.
Not Axies.

  1. This character goes looking for trouble.
  2. This character has a circle of confidantes.
  3. This character dabbles in architecture.
  4. This character changes (almost) everything.
Posted
25 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Not Dalinar, but I like the reminder.
Not Vin.
Not Shallan.
Not Sarene.
Not Kelsier.
Not Wax.
Not Axies.

  1. This character goes looking for trouble.
  2. This character has a circle of confidantes.
  3. This character dabbles in architecture.
  4. This character changes (almost) everything.

Jasnah? 

Posted
33 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Not Dalinar, but I like the reminder.
Not Vin.
Not Shallan.
Not Sarene.
Not Kelsier.
Not Wax.
Not Axies.

  1. This character goes looking for trouble.
  2. This character has a circle of confidantes.
  3. This character dabbles in architecture.
  4. This character changes (almost) everything.

Rashek? Gotta love Kredik Shaw

Posted
2 hours ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Correct!

Hey, nice one! I never thought you would go for one of the major characters. But those clues were really on spot! :D

Anyway, I got nothing prepared and a ton of gifts left to wrap, so whoever has something nice may have this turn. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...