Jump to content

[OB] Another shard revealed?


Lazarus52980

Recommended Posts

I'm listening to OB part 2 via audio book and one of the characters who is lamenting about infiltrating the calligrapher’s guild curses saying “by purity's eye…”.  Purity sounds like the name of a shard to me… any chance this is a first cosmere mention of a new shard? (New to us anyway…)

Edited by Lazarus52980
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nazh is the one who picks up these maps and drawings (and likes to complain about it), so he's almost certainly the one who wrote the page on glyphs. Purity fits with the naming system of the Threnodite system, who had a Shard (Ambition) there at one point. Purity might be a person, or maybe even a place, in Threnody, but not a Shard. Good catch, though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Shadowmancer said:

I'm still curious as to the identities of the letter-writers Hoid contacts. One I'm fairly positive is Harmony. What do the rest of you think?

Yes, the last series of epigraphs in part 2 are definitely Sazed, in convinced they're all shards and the rest all knew Cephandrius (Hoid) pre-shattering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TheOneKEA said:

There is a gas giant in the Threnodite system named Purity. I just checked the map in Arcanum Unbounded and verified where it was located in the system; it’s close enough to Threnody that it should be visible from that planet.

Well, so much for my theory.  Thank you for setting me straight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

That makes it likely that "Purity's eye" is a visible feature of the gas giant's atmosphere, like a giant storm.

I think the analogue on earth would sound slightly lamer: "by Jupiter's Red Spot":

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Storms! said:

Pretty sure Brandon confirmed this

He did confirm Autonomy. 

 

Quote

 

Chaos [PENDING REVIEW] (paraphrased)

Did you mean to imply that Autonomy wrote the second letter in Oathbringer back there, with the aspects thing?

Brandon Sanderson [PENDING REVIEW] (paraphrased)

Yeah, I did.

(He did imply that it was supposed to be fairly obvious.)


 

 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Chaos locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...