-ACE- he/him Posted Monday at 03:21 PM Posted Monday at 03:21 PM Just wondering why it's still the LGBTQ+ flag, even though June is over?
Frustration Posted Monday at 06:50 PM Posted Monday at 06:50 PM I still wish we could go back to the old banner, not the non-june one, the original from way back when. I liked that one a lot better. 1
Frustration Posted Monday at 09:01 PM Posted Monday at 09:01 PM 2 hours ago, GG0z said: Which one was that? This one 3
Chaos he/him Posted Wednesday at 03:21 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:21 PM Yeah it's a little bit of tradition, a little bit of laziness, and a little bit of us liking to trigger homophobes, you know? Ooof. That ancient logo is terrible though. 4
Frustration Posted Wednesday at 03:38 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:38 PM 15 minutes ago, Chaos said: Ooof. That ancient logo is terrible though. What? That was my favorite. Possibly just nostalgia talking, but I still loved it.
Treamayne Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 21 hours ago, Chaos said: Yeah it's a little bit of tradition, a little bit of laziness, and a little bit of us liking to trigger homophobes, you know? Ooof. That ancient logo is terrible though. As an Aro non-homophobe can I please just add that some of us dislike the extra-long "season" because the site still does not have dark mode and that version of the logo is eye-searingly painful. . .
Chaos he/him Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago 45 minutes ago, Treamayne said: As an Aro non-homophobe can I please just add that some of us dislike the extra-long "season" because the site still does not have dark mode and that version of the logo is eye-searingly painful. . . I feel like there's a lot more eye searing things there that are more impactful here but okay. 4
Treamayne Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago (edited) 4 minutes ago, Chaos said: I feel like there's a lot more eye searing things there that are more impactful here but okay. Note, I didn't ask to change it - and yes, there are many other bright elements. Also, the header is fairly easy to manage (just avoid scrolling up as much as possible). My point was simply this - not every complaint about the colorful logo comes from a place of fear or hatred or "homophobia". Some of us just wish for less eye-searing elements or a Dark mode that can mitigate them. Edited 13 hours ago by Treamayne
Honors Spectral Image She/her Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 1 hour ago, Treamayne said: As an Aro non-homophobe can I please just add that some of us dislike the extra-long "season" because the site still does not have dark mode and that version of the logo is eye-searingly painful. . . That part doesn’t rly bother me, I would however love a dark mode on this website idrk if that’s possible but I think it would be rly nice 2
Usseewa ✾ She♡They ✾ Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Honors Spectral Image said: That part doesn’t rly bother me, I would however love a dark mode on this website idrk if that’s possible but I think it would be rly nice its possible but been discussed and i think the outcome was it wouldnt rly work with new forum software versions, would have to be updated, and might be hard. i forget. ive thought of trying to make a browser extension for it but tbh i dont have motivation and have like not much experience with darkmode stuff so it'd be spaghetti and probably hard and also yeha Edited 11 hours ago by Usseewa
Chaos he/him Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago 3 hours ago, Treamayne said: Note, I didn't ask to change it - and yes, there are many other bright elements. Also, the header is fairly easy to manage (just avoid scrolling up as much as possible). My point was simply this - not every complaint about the colorful logo comes from a place of fear or hatred or "homophobia". Some of us just wish for less eye-searing elements or a Dark mode that can mitigate them. True, but in my experience, that... is not very much the majority or usual. That might just be you, actually, as looking at this I think there's a lot more that's a lot brighter. 1 hour ago, Usseewa said: its possible but been discussed and i think the outcome was it wouldnt rly work with new forum software versions, would have to be updated, and might be hard. i forget. This isn't that category of thing, actually, but it does require time to do. It's low on my priority list of tasks at least. I should try and devote some time to this... 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now