KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted Sunday at 03:34 AM Posted Sunday at 03:34 AM (edited) I realised that there was no thread dedicated to this, so I decided to make one! Tau Day is coming up, after all. For those of you who don't know, Tau is equal to 2π, and is an alternative circle constant. τ is good because if you use π, a full circle is 2π radians, but with τ, it's just one τ radians, which makes trig waaaaay easier. So yes, I believe τ is objectively better than π, but I am also too used to π to swap now And also most calculators lack tau, and there's no song to help me memorise it, so... Anyways, what do y'all think of tau? Edited Sunday at 04:04 AM by KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren SPaG
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted Sunday at 03:48 AM Posted Sunday at 03:48 AM (edited) At this point, π has used enough that it's probably going to stay what we keep using. Plus e^(πi) + 1 = 0. Edited Sunday at 03:48 AM by Through the Living Hopper
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted Sunday at 03:53 AM Author Posted Sunday at 03:53 AM 3 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: At this point, π has used enough that it's probably going to stay what we keep using. Probably, but there's still a chance 3 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: Plus e^(πi) + 1 = 0. Oh yes, something I forgot to mention... With π, Euler's Identity is kind of clunky because you need the +1 to make it a zero But with tau... e^(τi) = 1 So yeah, another reason tau is better
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted Sunday at 03:56 AM Posted Sunday at 03:56 AM 1 minute ago, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said: With π, Euler's Identity is kind of clunky because you need the +1 to make it a zero But with tau... e^(τi) = 1 So yeah, another reason tau is better Except, 1 and 0 are two identities. 1 is the multiplicative, and 0 is the additive. Having only one of those two doesn't fully let us appreciate the beauty of the formula.
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted Sunday at 03:59 AM Author Posted Sunday at 03:59 AM 2 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: Except, 1 and 0 are two identities. 1 is the multiplicative, and 0 is the additive. Having only one of those two doesn't fully let us appreciate the beauty of the formula. Yes, but e to the pi i doesn't equal 1, it equals negative one The one is just there to make it a nicer number
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted Sunday at 04:00 AM Posted Sunday at 04:00 AM Just now, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said: Yes, but e to the pi i doesn't equal 1, it equals negative one The one is just there to make it a nicer number Also to add another identity. And that's a common way those formulas are written (to equal 0).
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted Sunday at 04:03 AM Author Posted Sunday at 04:03 AM 2 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: 3 minutes ago, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said: Also to add another identity. Why are you adding the multiplicative identity ? 2 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: And that's a common way those formulas are written (to equal 0). One works just as well The extra +1 makes it not as good for π's
Usseewa ✾ She♡They ✾ Posted Sunday at 06:43 PM Posted Sunday at 06:43 PM the symbol for tau looks like half a pi (the right part of pi), so it's funny that's it's 2pi..
Chaos he/him Posted Sunday at 11:44 PM Posted Sunday at 11:44 PM Tau is so much better. It'd make learning the unit circle far easier. Half the circle would be tau/2. Way better! In basically every physics formula, it's always 2pi. That really should indicate that 2pi is the correct one. I mean, when the hell do we even is C = pi * d? Use the radius! The radius is the important one. You might say, "But Eric what about A = pi*r^2?" To which I'd say, A = 1/2 tau*r^2 is very symmetric with the kinetic energy formula. That 1/2 should be there anyway, due to integration. In fact, I thought that one argument against tau was that the standard normal distribution had a single sqrt(pi) rather than sqrt(2pi), but nope! It does have a 2pi. I guess the integral from -infinity to infinity of e^(-x^2) has the sqrt(pi)... So anyway, I'm a math professor who loves tau. I'm not at all a fan of pi day, and I won't stand for this pi propaganda merely because "well then we can have pie on pi day". Lame. I spend pi day in my math tutoring center explaining why tau is superior. 7
Shatter He/Him Posted Monday at 06:07 PM Posted Monday at 06:07 PM I like τ and π. I'm not an ultra mathy guy, so I just decide which one to use and stick with it.
Keteᛕ He/Him/His Posted Monday at 09:54 PM Posted Monday at 09:54 PM The formula for the area of a circle is A = pi r^2, compared to A = (tau r^2)/2... pi is also much older 1
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted Monday at 10:03 PM Author Posted Monday at 10:03 PM 7 minutes ago, Keteᛕ said: The formula for the area of a circle is A = pi r^2, compared to A = (tau r^2)/2... That is one equation, when tau makes basically everything else easier. Do you do trig? Also, as Chaos said, it aligns well with the kinetic energy formula. 8 minutes ago, Keteᛕ said: pi is also much older That is not a good reason... geocentrism is way older than anything else... 1
Usseewa ✾ She♡They ✾ Posted Tuesday at 11:53 AM Posted Tuesday at 11:53 AM 13 hours ago, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said: That is not a good reason... geocentrism is way older than anything else... aggree makes me question everything we think we know, and believe
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted Tuesday at 09:46 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 09:46 PM 9 hours ago, Usseewa said: makes me question everything we think we know, and believe Aaaand that is how science happens 1
Shatter He/Him Posted Wednesday at 12:50 PM Posted Wednesday at 12:50 PM On 6/15/2026 at 6:03 PM, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said: That is one equation, when tau makes basically everything else easier. Do you do trig? Also, as Chaos said, it aligns well with the kinetic energy formula. That is not a good reason... geocentrism is way older than anything else... Technically, heliocentrism is almost as old. It's from 250 BCE, and geocentrism is from 380 BCE. At least according to recorded history. I also see some bias in the pinned tag...
Chaos he/him Posted Wednesday at 02:51 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:51 PM On 6/16/2026 at 4:53 AM, Usseewa said: makes me question everything we think we know, and believe Good! We should question everything, and discard anything that doesn't have a good reason to believe. 2
Through the Living Wrath he/him Posted Wednesday at 04:05 PM Posted Wednesday at 04:05 PM (edited) You know guys, the tau that can be told is not the eternal τ. As stated in the τ Te Ching Edited Wednesday at 04:11 PM by Through the Living Wrath
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted 15 hours ago Author Posted 15 hours ago (edited) 22 hours ago, Shatter said: I also see some bias in the pinned tag... Also tau supporters, I found that online, there weren't any good tools to help memorise tau, so I made one! https://k-sauce.github.io/tau_memoriser/index.html I tried making it as fast as possible, so the UI isn't that great. It also doesn't work on mobile because you need to type the digits. Also, I should've included this in the OP, but here's the tau manifesto: https://www.tauday.com/tau-manifesto Edited 15 hours ago by KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren 1
Just A Silvereye he/him/il/lui Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago Well, I have been using pi forever, and I don't like changing stuff. It logically follows that tau is heresy and all of you should be burned at the stake, for I shall not admit that one prefers doing things differently of me.
DrPhysics he/him Posted 26 minutes ago Posted 26 minutes ago (edited) On 6/14/2026 at 5:44 PM, Chaos said: A = 1/2 tau*r^2 is very symmetric with the kinetic energy formula. That 1/2 should be there anyway, due to integration. @ChaosI'm going to call you out on this one (I'm a physics professor). If that's your justification, then volume of a sphere would be 1/6 tau r^3, not 2/3 tau r^3 Area integrals don't need to be symmetric with path integrals. (Please note tone of joking/sarcasm) And solutions to the wave equation are much more satisfying to write as sin(n pi x/L). Who would want sin(n tau x/(2L))? That's a whole other constant I need to track through separation of variables. Also, if we use tau for 2pi, what am I going to call torque, time constants, and shear stress? Edited 25 minutes ago by DrPhysics Spelling 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now