Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

tl;dr:

I theorise that the Dawnshards represent the Commands one can take relating to the core axes of the Cosmere, Identity and Connection:

  • Exist increases Identity
  • Reduce decreases Identity
  • Merge increases Connection
  • Change decreases Connection

The Shards are imperfect expressions of divinity that took the shape they did specifically because of the individual vessels who took them up. Each Dawnshard created a quarter of Adonalsium that represented that Dawnshard's Command, and four people each took part of that quarter, influencing it with their own perception of what that Command means.

Spoiler

The first letters of them also spell CREM, which is mostly just for my amusement and as a reference to the CRUD operations I've seen lots of people liken the Dawnshards to.

This means the Shards can be expressed as vectors on a plane made of two axes, Identity and Connection, as follows (where a larger bubble means a more forceful expression, and a smaller bubble means a more subtle one, though I'm less focused on that distinction in this post):

CREMaxisactual.thumb.png.6a6c0efe8703fdc534a54e1fe0b82096.png

The evidence:

This worked well in my last post. Rather than link to things in the text, I've just collated here a bunch of stuff that led me to this theory. I've linked to WoBs where possible, but some of it is from the books themselves.

Cosmere mechanics:

The nature of Shards:

The role of perception and Intent:

From here on out, assume everything I say is speculative, even if I don't preface it with 'I reckon' or whatever.

 

Matching Shards to Dawnshards

First up, some justification as to why I mapped each Shard to the Dawnshards the way I did.

This part is largely up to interpretation, especially with how little we know about some of the Shards, and I welcome debate on my specific mapping of the Shards. I am happy with which quadrant contains which Shard. I've put them where they are based on a bunch of evidence and personal interpretation that would make this already-unwieldy post quite silly, but I did want to highlight in particular how each Shard grants its Invested Art:

Spoiler
Dawnshard Shard Invested Art acquisition
Exist Endowment Freely given
Exist Preservation Contain a piece of Preservation
Exist Virtuosity Work on mastery over a skill or art
Exist Ambition  
Change Autonomy Overcome personal challenges
Change Valor  
Change Invention  
Change Reason  
Reduce Whimsy  
Reduce Ruin Steal from another's Spiritweb
Reduce Odium Hijack and override Identity
Reduce Mercy  
Merge Devotion Literally devote onself to something
Merge Dominion Bruteforce Connection with others
Merge Cultivation Submit Spiritweb to be cultivated
Merge Honor Swear and uphold oaths

 

I've left blank the ones we don't know, but IMO this clearly shows how each Shard is related to its Dawnshard.

Exist: Of the Exist Shards we know, we can see they share a theme around improving/empowering the self in some way.

Change: Only one here, and I'll likely update Autonomy's entry when we have more info.

Reduce: Ruin and Odium both require some form of Identity-reduction to acquire their power.

Merge: We've experienced Invested Arts from all four of the Merge Shards, and they all share a clear common theme of increasing Connection. Devotion and Dominion have a slight bias toward reducing Identity, and Cultivation and Honor have a slight bias toward increasing it, but their main defining feature is in someway committing to an increase in Connection.

 

Four groups of Shards

So we know a group of people got together and killed big-G God using the Dawnshards. From Rysn's mural in particular, it's reasonable to assume that Adonalsium was first split into 4, then into 16.

I've seen plenty of theories that posit that the Dawnshards split each of the initial quarters again (so Preservation would be Exist/Exist, Odium might be Reduce/Merge, etc), but there's nothing to say that was the case. It's a neat way of explaining why there are 16 Shards, but we know there didn't have to be 16. There could've been more, or fewer, or Hoid might have taken one to make 17. The only reason there are 16 Shards is because 16 people decided to take up the splintered power.

All we can say from that is that Adonalsium was split into four, and then those fragments were split into sixteen mostly (but not perfectly) symmetrical pieces.

I think the Dawnshards split Adonalsium into four chunks of divinity that each represented one of the Commands, and the 16 to-be-vessels simply chose some of the essence of each one to look after, unintentionally shaping it by the very nature of interacting with it. For example, only Edgli could've extracted Endowment from Exist, and she physically couldn't have extracted anything different from it, just like I couldn't just decide to start flying.

I have split this up assuming 4 people each shared a Dawnshard, probably on agreement to split the power evenly, but there's no reason the actual set-up we have now couldn't be, for example, 5 Exist, 2 Merge, 6 Change and 3 Reduce (although I believe Ati was reluctantly 'forced' to take a Reduce Shard, which implies they did split them evenly).

As an example, let's look at what I think happened with Merge:

Aona, Skai, Koravellium and Tanavast were chosen to be the stewards of the Merge quadrant. Each of them, based on their personal worldviews and perceptions, understood the Command differently:

  • Aona saw prioritising Connection to others and to ideals over one's own personal desires, so her chunk became Devotion
  • Skai saw the enforcement of Connection above all else, an empire with him at its head to ensure order: Dominion
  • Koravellium (a dragon who was used to looking after mortals) saw individuals as potential pieces of a spiritual whole that need careful pruning to better make them fit: Cultivation
  • Tanavast saw oaths and promises as tools to bind people to each other for structure and strength: Honor

In each case, the Shardic Intent was fractured and warped by the perception of each person that took some of the power. 'Cultivation' as a concept didn't exist until Koravellium interacted with the quarter of Adonalsium's broken soul that represented the Merge Dawnshard.

 

 Imperfection

So the Dawnshards created perfect quarters, and then the vessels created imperfect divisions within those quarters. This is why the Shards mostly don't have perfect opposites.

Theoretically, that means there should be an 'ideal' form of the 16 Shards, where they all do have perfect opposites. To that end (and to help me guide where the actual Shards came from), I started from the Dawnshards and thought about what they actually represented. I then looked at how they would sit in a grid and considered their neighbours (eg: an Exist Shard with high Connection relates closer to Merge than to Reduce), giving them names to help guide my thinking. Those 8 together became Protoshards, and from those I suggested what the 16 Ideal Shards might have looked like in a perfect split.

I've included these as a sort of 'show your working' so you can see how I arrived at the conclusions I did:

Spoiler
Dawnshard Boundary Name Protoshard Ideal Shard Shard
Exist Fortify Continuity Expansion Endowment
Exist Fortify Continuity Stasis Preservation
Exist Isolate Assertion Perfection Virtuosity
Exist Isolate Assertion Aspiration Ambition
Change Isolate Sovereignty Independence Autonomy
Change Isolate Sovereignty Resolve Valor
Change Destabilise Disruption Innovation Invention
Change Destabilise Disruption Curiosity Reason
Reduce Destabilise Dissolution Caprice Whimsy
Reduce Destabilise Dissolution Entropy Ruin
Reduce Bind Submission Compulsion Odium
Reduce Bind Submission Surrender Mercy
Merge Bind Unity Concord Devotion
Merge Bind Unity Authority Dominion
Merge Fortify Elevation Integration Cultivation
Merge Fortify Elevation Commitment Honor

(side note, but having Unity as the Protoshard for Devotion and Dominion is just too satisfying)

 

So, if Adonalsium were split into 16 purely equal and unmodified Shards, we might expect something like this:

Spoiler

CREMaxesideal.thumb.png.7a614ca3df595be4a2ce91cc4d17554e.png

When what we actually got was this (I included Harmony and Retribution, for which I simply summed the Identity and Connection values for their constituent Shards):

Spoiler

CREMaxisactual.thumb.png.6a6c0efe8703fdc534a54e1fe0b82096.png

 

How Honor and Ruin fit

Tanavast and Ati are interesting case studies here, and I've put that tangent in a spoiler to save space:

Spoiler

Tanavast

Tanavast saw Merge and thought "yes, I understand what that means; Oaths and structure are important to help people, and I, as a god, can uphold that".

Throughout Tanavast's flashbacks in WaT, he's constantly spouting and overcompensating, repeating that he, as a god, should be worshipped, and a good example, and a provider to his people. The dichotomy he faced with Honor was threefold:

  • Tanavast thought he understood Honor, but was immature in his understanding and overestimated his ability to truly uphold it, like someone stubbornly ordering the spiciest thing on the menu before having to tap out halfway through and ask for a glass of milk
  • The Shards are not morally influenced; for most vessels, this was fine, but Tanavast struggled a lot to separate Honor's actual Intent from what he wanted to be and uphold as a god
  • Part of Tanavast's image of Honor is impossible in a Merge-only Shard; using Oaths to do what's right is a much more complex philosophical position that requires Intent contained in the other Shards

Tanavast's perception of Merge created the Intent Honor, but the resulting 'oaths over everything' Intent clashed with Tanavast's idea of moral righteousness.

 

Ati 

This one is even more interesting; Ati was diametrically opposed to Ruin and thought he could bend the Shard to his own will. I believe that Ati either willingly submitted to or was forced to take a Reduce Shard to maintain an equal balance of vessels across the four quadrants. This is actually (imo) why Ruin and Preservation are perfect opposites; everyone else influenced the creation of a Shard that represented their worldview; Ati didn't consider himself to align with Reduce, so his perception of it was simply the opposite concept of one of the Exist Shards (which is in itself a great representation of Identity sacrifice, ironically making Ati a fantastic candidate for a Reduce Shard).

Even then, why wasn't that disagreement enough for Ruin to leave Ati? I think this one has a few reasons:

  • Ati never actually acted against Ruin; he thought about it, and wanted to modify Ruin, but didn't want to risk losing stewardship over it
  • The longer Ati stayed with Ruin, the more Ruin's Intent warped Ati's perception, melding the two together more strongly over time
  • Ruin itself had no reason to leave Ati, and Shards usually don't 'think' like that (Honor is just one of many examples in the Cosmere of unbound Investiture spontaneously developing consciousness)

Ati didn't actually act against Ruin, and Ruin's Identity-reducing nature eventually caused Ati to lose himself fully in the Shard's Intent.

 

 Cultivator? I barely know her!

(canned laughter)

"But Cultivation doesn't Merge things, she literally Changes them!" Excellent point, and one that bugged me for a while, too. But Preservation also changed things, and the biggest consistent thing I've seen across Dawnshard theories is that Preservation is the primo example of an Exist Shard.

Another spoiler tag for another tangent:

Spoiler

Remember that a Shard's Intent influences how people access that Shard's power, not what people can do with it. The only confirmed instances we have of Cultivation herself (rather than the Nightwatcher, a spren with its own Identity and Intent) directly blessing a mortal are:

  • Taravangian: he willingly asked for capacity to save his people; Cultivation granted that to him in a way specifically to groom him to become Odium
  • Dalinar: he willingly sought a way to get over his mistakes and become a better person; Cultivation gave him the emotional space and resilience he needed to grow into a leader who helped build the largest coalition Roshar had seen in a long time
  • Lift: she willingly demanded that she 'stay the same'; Cultivation linked her to herself with the ability to access Lifelight, and gave her a much stronger bond to the Cognitive and Spiritual realms than people can normally achieve

All of these have something in common that let us eliminate the other Dawnshard candidates:

  • Cutivation waited for them to willingly opt-in and consent: can't be Reduce
  • They volunteered to have their Identity modified by an external agent: can't be Exist
  • They all specifically wanted to avoid disruption/destruction coming to something they loved: can't be Change

Also, her impact on the Knights Radiant was to introduce ideals as a scalable method to measure growth. This growth is different by Order, and is measured and validated by the different types of spren. Knights Radiant as a whole aren't measured primarily on personal growth (though some Orders do prioritise that), but on their adherence to (and therefore aligning and Merging with) a pre-defined structure.

Cultivation doesn't disrupt; she prunes and guides toward a more holistic spiritual garden. She increases Connection, and therefore Merges.

 

Edited by PanLin
added to the justifications section
Posted (edited)

Had a similar theory back in the day.  Metals and shards in my sig now.

Edited by Karger
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Beautiful reasoning. The most complete theorisation as to the fundemental nature of the core concepts in the cosmere I have seen so far.

I will say that given our comparatively diminutive knowledge of most of the shards, the accuracy of where they stand on your axes is questionable. But, I see no real reason why they would be wrong.

 

I will also say that shardic capabilities would need to be further explored for more accuracy: We know they basically have infinite investiture (or, a large amount at least). We know investiture can be, and shards do, utilise them for a wide range of "magical" effects.

However, as to the actual nature of investiture: The logic behind it's capabilties mainly, is not explored yet (as far as I have observed). We've lots of categorisations (potential, kintetic, etc.) but that doesn't explain it's nature. 

Arguably, energy and forces are in the same manner. Try to define energy. We've lots of ways it can be utilised in equations and extrapolation, but it isn't really a tangible thing (Arguably, waves are "pure" energy according to some, but I disagree with that on the basis of the vagueness of our definitions regarding it). However, the reason why I believe investiture should, and will be, further explained is because it is described as a tangible... thing. With an appearance and everything. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Denissimo said:

Beautiful reasoning. The most complete theorisation as to the fundemental nature of the core concepts in the cosmere I have seen so far.

Gosh, big words! Thanks so much for reading and leaving the feedback.

 

4 minutes ago, Denissimo said:

I will say that given our comparatively diminutive knowledge of most of the shards, the accuracy of where they stand on your axes is questionable

Oh for sure, and I'll be the first to disprove my own theories when new information comes out 😅 I'm a data professional at heart and can't stand misinformation.

 

6 minutes ago, Denissimo said:

But, I see no real reason why they would be wrong.

I really appreciate that, thanks! Be sure to let me know if you do think of anything though, I genuinely love having my ideas and theories challenged.

Posted

Also, I have a similar theory deriving off similar views to this: In regards to the way shards use investiture, how it is warped by both vessel identity and the shardic intent.

The example I used was the clash between Ati and Vin. Most shardic clashes have lead to mass destruction. Rends in the realms, the whole shabang. However, Ati and Vin just sort of deleted each other, leaving Scadrial very much intact.

I believed the reason for this was the intents of Ruin and Preservation are directly opposed (as also indicated by your scale), leading their investiture-clashing... thing...

to also cancel out very neatly. I need time to flesh out the details, but thats the basis of it.

Odium and Honor have overlaps somewhat in their intents. They did not cancel out when the shards "touched", leading to the mass destruction shown. They had time to exist and tear each other to pieces.

 

Posted

Oop sorry, didn't see your other points when I first replied!

 

10 minutes ago, Denissimo said:

However, as to the actual nature of investiture: The logic behind it's capabilties mainly, is not explored yet (as far as I have observed). We've lots of categorisations (potential, kintetic, etc.) but that doesn't explain it's nature. 

Arguably, energy and forces are in the same manner. Try to define energy. We've lots of ways it can be utilised in equations and extrapolation, but it isn't really a tangible thing (Arguably, waves are "pure" energy according to some, but I disagree with that on the basis of the vagueness of our definitions regarding it). However, the reason why I believe investiture should, and will be, further explained is because it is described as a tangible... thing. With an appearance and everything. 

Yep agreed! Even in the real world, the more we understand about energy and matter, the more it feels like trying to cleanly define either as its own separate thing is almost redundant at the quantum level. Investiture in the Cosmere is like adding a third variable to that famous equation. As we learn more about its mechanics, I expect it will either come to be defined as:

  • straight-up a third form that 'stuff' can exist as, alongside energy and matter
  • a sort of mirror, where we end up with physical energy-matter and Invested energy-matter (depends how different, realmatically, kinetic and static Investiture are)

 

7 minutes ago, Denissimo said:

The example I used was the clash between Ati and Vin. Most shardic clashes have lead to mass destruction. Rends in the realms, the whole shabang. However, Ati and Vin just sort of deleted each other, leaving Scadrial very much intact.

I believed the reason for this was the intents of Ruin and Preservation are directly opposed (as also indicated by your scale), leading their investiture-clashing... thing...

to also cancel out very neatly. I need time to flesh out the details, but thats the basis of it.

Odium and Honor have overlaps somewhat in their intents. They did not cancel out when the shards "touched", leading to the mass destruction shown. They had time to exist and tear each other to pieces.

I do kind of disagree with the bolded bit—granted, it may have been because of Ruin's machinations, but Scadrial was messed up after that clash, and required immediate reshaping and repairing by Harmony.

Although it would help to explain why Honor and Odium almost tore Roshar apart when Preservation and Ruin were able to Invest Scadrial for ages without anything as dramatic, unless that was just part of the agreement between Leras and Ati.

That said, you may still be right! I'm going to follow you and eagerly await the full theory 👀

Posted
1 hour ago, PanLin said:

Oop sorry, didn't see your other points when I first replied!

 

Yep agreed! Even in the real world, the more we understand about energy and matter, the more it feels like trying to cleanly define either as its own separate thing is almost redundant at the quantum level. Investiture in the Cosmere is like adding a third variable to that famous equation. As we learn more about its mechanics, I expect it will either come to be defined as:

  • straight-up a third form that 'stuff' can exist as, alongside energy and matter
  • a sort of mirror, where we end up with physical energy-matter and Invested energy-matter (depends how different, realmatically, kinetic and static Investiture are)

 

I do kind of disagree with the bolded bit—granted, it may have been because of Ruin's machinations, but Scadrial was messed up after that clash, and required immediate reshaping and repairing by Harmony.

Although it would help to explain why Honor and Odium almost tore Roshar apart when Preservation and Ruin were able to Invest Scadrial for ages without anything as dramatic, unless that was just part of the agreement between Leras and Ati.

That said, you may still be right! I'm going to follow you and eagerly await the full theory 👀

"I do kind of disagree with the bolded bit—granted, it may have been because of Ruin's machinations, but Scadrial was messed up after that clash, and required immediate reshaping and repairing by Harmony."
In reference to this, from what I know, it was mainly due to Ruin's destructive intent throughout history rather than that specific clash. Most of Scadrial's problems came from Ruin's direct influence (apart from the mists... though Ruin had a major hand in that, though not it's creation) rather than a result of the clash between Preservation and Ruin. That, and the effects that Rashek had caused when he briefly took the power of the Well of Ascension.

My point being, I'm pretty sure Scadrial was messed up not due to the clash between the shards, but as you said Ruin's machinations.

"

Yep agreed! Even in the real world, the more we understand about energy and matter, the more it feels like trying to cleanly define either as its own separate thing is almost redundant at the quantum level. Investiture in the Cosmere is like adding a third variable to that famous equation. As we learn more about its mechanics, I expect it will either come to be defined as:

  • straight-up a third form that 'stuff' can exist as, alongside energy and matter
  • a sort of mirror, where we end up with physical energy-matter and Invested energy-matter (depends how different, realmatically, kinetic and static Investiture are)"

Yes, yes! Exactly! 
Most of the most complex and abstract parts of physics, and I mainly refer to concepts to do with energy and time are simply mathematical frameworks constructed to make predicitons based on previously observed patterns, not a literal representation of what exists! When these abstractions work consistently, it becomes tempting to treat them as physically real entities rather than as tools. This risks reifying concepts that may only approximate deeper, unknown structures, leading us to mistake the elegance and success of our equations for a direct window into the true nature of reality rather than a highly effective, but ultimately limited, representation of it. It blurs the line between model and reality, partially due to our scuppered education system which doesn't clarify that! I've got professors teaching relativity, yet unable to properly prove that time is indeed a traversible dimension using arguments other than those bordering on apologetics ("How can you prove it isn't?").

The reason why these models exist is to allow us to do calculations and predicitons accurately without having to fully comprehend the deeper structures that exist, becuase we have't figured those out yet. We understand the mathematical correlations, but not what the variables actually are.

That was a rant, and i somehow deviated from the initially discussion regarding investiture.

I wonder if Sanderson will chose to reframe energy and matter to accomodate for investiture. I once argued it to be the "measurement of quantum uncertainty able to be influenced through intent", but that isn't something tangible and physical, which is how it is framed.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Denissimo said:

In reference to this, from what I know, it was mainly due to Ruin's destructive intent throughout history rather than that specific clash. Most of Scadrial's problems came from Ruin's direct influence (apart from the mists... though Ruin had a major hand in that, though not it's creation) rather than a result of the clash between Preservation and Ruin. That, and the effects that Rashek had caused when he briefly took the power of the Well of Ascension.

My point being, I'm pretty sure Scadrial was messed up not due to the clash between the shards, but as you said Ruin's machinations.

Yeah valid! As I say, eager to read the full theory when you post it 🙂

 

1 hour ago, Denissimo said:

Yes, yes! Exactly! 
Most of the most complex and abstract parts of physics, and I mainly refer to concepts to do with energy and time are simply mathematical frameworks constructed to make predicitons based on previously observed patterns, not a literal representation of what exists! When these abstractions work consistently, it becomes tempting to treat them as physically real entities rather than as tools. This risks reifying concepts that may only approximate deeper, unknown structures, leading us to mistake the elegance and success of our equations for a direct window into the true nature of reality rather than a highly effective, but ultimately limited, representation of it. It blurs the line between model and reality, partially due to our scuppered education system which doesn't clarify that! I've got professors teaching relativity, yet unable to properly prove that time is indeed a traversible dimension using arguments other than those bordering on apologetics ("How can you prove it isn't?").

The reason why these models exist is to allow us to do calculations and predicitons accurately without having to fully comprehend the deeper structures that exist, becuase we have't figured those out yet. We understand the mathematical correlations, but not what the variables actually are.

Love the enthusiasm 😂

And yes, I completely agree! Especially considering the philosophical and religious context that obviously inspires Sanderson.

Perception and Intent are both wildly powerful and important in the Cosmere (I have a theory that they actually defined what specific Shards we ended up with after the Shattering), and I really think that Investiture is essentially the mechanism/force/law that allows for them to have that influence over reality. It seems to be this extra nebulous 'thing' that gives Sanderson a way to weave divinity and consciousness into the fundamental laws of reality.

It's entirely possible that we won't ever truly understand what Investiture actually is, and will only have these mathematical/predictive models that approximate it well enough. We already know that a lot of the in-universe explanations of things are given by unreliable narrators (yes, even Khriss)—Rosharans are prone to calling all kinetic Investiture Surgebinding, for example.

 

1 hour ago, Denissimo said:

That was a rant, and i somehow deviated from the initially discussion regarding investiture.

I wonder if Sanderson will chose to reframe energy and matter to accomodate for investiture. I once argued it to be the "measurement of quantum uncertainty able to be influenced through intent", but that isn't something tangible and physical, which is how it is framed.

I fully enjoyed the rant, thanks.

From everything we've seen so far, it feels like he's trying to posit Investiture as an add-on that makes reality in the Cosmere fundamentally different from our own, rather than something squeezed into real-world physics models.

Edited by PanLin

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...