EmulatonStromenkiin he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 Just now, Nameless said: This Document certifies that Nameless has hired The Essence To deal with legal matters, foolish non-divines, and, on request, semi-Divine distracting Entities Signed: Nameless T̸̨̢͔̖̤̥͇̤̤̠̲̩͔̳͙̹̟̓̈͐̄͊̓̊͌̏̑̈́̇̓̒̉̆̈́̆́̔̈̇̈́̏̄͐̄̀̽̚̚͝ͅh̸̢̡͓̝̥̙̜̼̲͈̲͙̩̤̙͓̙̥̝̥͈̞̫̰̜͖͖͈͛̈̂̒͋̅̂̀̈̅ẻ̶̢̧̧̮̲͇͈̩̠̟͉̳̞̣̝̙̯̺̣̖͎̻́̓̉̅͂́͂̈́̂́̕ ̷̡̢̛͍̘̝͍̠͙̘̩̲̲̠͍̙̤̺̔̈̅̀̂̋̏͗̓̀̇͊̍̄͆̾̊͒̕͝ͅĔ̷̢̢̛͈͙̯͍̹͉̟̹̗͕̺̤̘̱̹͎̱̒̎̄́̈́̊͗̋̈͗̈́͒̄̓̀̀͋̉͘͘͝ͅͅͅs̴̤̜̲̺͙̳̭̫̯̫̱͍̖̗̭̟̥̼͈͓̘̭̖͖̙͇̗̬̘̼̥̠̿̎̐̍̍̈́̈́́͆̈́̃̈͋͑̐̋̇̈́̓̍̄̆̓͐̆̐͂̊͑̕̚͝͝͝s̷̡̢̡̧̡̗̘̙̺̙̬̬̜͓̣̻̬͚̥͓͔̯̯͎̣̼̮̭͋ë̶̡̡̨̧̛̮̹̪̻͓̳̬͍͙̲̰̱͚̠̤͙̫̝̬̹͉̲̹̼͕̠̎͊̀͐̽̈́̚͜͠ͅͅͅn̷̡̨̢͉̞͎̤̪̰̣̲͍̞̗̉̋͑̈́̇̉̋̍̔͂̐̓́̕̕͠ç̸̨̨̧̧̡̲̘̣̘̘̠͙̭̳̺̦̻̤̝̥̳̪̗̳̺̘͍͙̍͋͗̉́̿͠͝ȩ̴̧̖̱̥̜̤̣̥̭̪̖͈̙̣͔͚͖̜͓̱̝̭͖͓̹̺͖̬͑̃̔͋͆̋̃̈́̌̔̈́͆͆̈̿̎̑̌̋̂̀͌̔͒̌͝͝ Very well, my powers as The Essence have been activated on your behalf. What now?
NameIess Posted June 1, 2022 Author Posted June 1, 2022 Just now, Boomerang Guy said: Why not! We both want to spread waffles! But you want to spread Chortles first and waffles second.
Ironwill2112 he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 Just now, Nameless said: But you want to spread Chortles first and waffles second. No that’s not true. We spread waffles WHILE we chortle. We spread dem waffles. Only members are chortling for the most part.
NameIess Posted June 1, 2022 Author Posted June 1, 2022 Just now, Boomerang Guy said: No that’s not true. We spread waffles WHILE we chortle. We spread dem waffles. Only members are chortling for the most part. Still. There is no alliance. We can work together when our purposes align. 3 minutes ago, EmulatonStromenkiin said: Very well, my powers as The Essence have been activated on your behalf. What now? Uhhhhhhhhhh.... convince Boomerang Guy to stop trying to unsplit Chortlism?
Ironwill2112 he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 1 minute ago, Nameless said: Still. There is no alliance. We can work together when our purposes align. Uhhhhhhhhhh.... convince Boomerang Guy to stop trying to unsplit Chortlism? That is acceptable. I am NOT trying to unsplit CHORTLISM.
EmulatonStromenkiin he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 1 minute ago, Boomerang Guy said: That is acceptable. I am NOT trying to unsplit CHORTLISM. Well, stop trying to make an unrelated alliance. You get the chortles, we get the Waffles.
Ironwill2112 he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 I already had both! Tho waffles are not ALL mine. My desire to share them is shared with y’all
EmulatonStromenkiin he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 5 minutes ago, Boomerang Guy said: I already had both! Tho waffles are not ALL mine. My desire to share them is shared with y’all Waffles are only a subsidary of what you have, and you only have a subsidiary of waffles. therefore, nothing has changed.
Ironwill2112 he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 Yeah I guess. Chortlism is chortles and 50% waffles. Wafflism is just waffles. Yeah?
EmulatonStromenkiin he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 21 minutes ago, Boomerang Guy said: Yeah I guess. Chortlism is chortles and 50% waffles. Wafflism is just waffles. Yeah? To clarify, you have domain over "Chorffles" Chortle-waffles. We have everything else.
NameIess Posted June 1, 2022 Author Posted June 1, 2022 1 minute ago, EmulatonStromenkiin said: To clarify, you have domain over "Chorffles" Chortle-waffles. We have everything else. Yes. Although 'Chorffles' might be illegal to produce and sell.
EmulatonStromenkiin he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 Just now, Nameless said: Yes. Although 'Chorffles' might be illegal to produce and sell. this is a moot point. The name might have to be changed when marketing, but the recipie is not possible to trademark
Ironwill2112 he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Nameless said: Yes. Although 'Chorffles' might be illegal to produce and sell. Yeah but we won’t talk about that right nameless. Considering that YOU were the one baking them. Your illegal recipe Edited June 1, 2022 by Boomerang Guy
NameIess Posted June 1, 2022 Author Posted June 1, 2022 1 minute ago, EmulatonStromenkiin said: this is a moot point. The name might have to be changed when marketing, but the recipie is not possible to trademark Chorffles are illegal because they contain hemalurgic spikes. 2 minutes ago, Boomerang Guy said: Yeah but we won’t talk about that right nameless. Considering that YOU were the one baking them. I have no idea what you're talking about. I was the high inquisitor. I didn't have the time to bake Chorffles.
Ironwill2112 he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 Just now, Nameless said: Chorffles are illegal because they contain hemalurgic spikes. I have no idea what you're talking about. I was the high inquisitor. I didn't have the time to bake Chorffles. You were the head chef so you could better harvest the spikes. YOU CANT DENY IT!!
NameIess Posted June 1, 2022 Author Posted June 1, 2022 Just now, Boomerang Guy said: You were the head chef so you could better harvest the spikes. YOU CANT DENY IT!! I am quite offended by this accusation.
Ironwill2112 he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 Riiiiiiiiiiiight not to mention you there were also corpses in them. Too. I already changed the recipe.
NameIess Posted June 1, 2022 Author Posted June 1, 2022 4 minutes ago, Boomerang Guy said: Riiiiiiiiiiiight not to mention you there were also corpses in them. Too. I already changed the recipe. What? Corpses? That's awful. I had no idea they were in there. Someone must have changed the recipe without telling me.
EmulatonStromenkiin he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, Nameless said: What? Corpses? That's awful. I had no idea they were in there. Someone must have changed the recipe without telling me. they were corpses of yeast. Why did you put yeast in waffles? 15 minutes ago, Nameless said: Chorffles are illegal because they contain hemalurgic spikes. Ah. Yes. Anything with hemalurgic spikes in it is not legal, and is of dubious morality.
Ironwill2112 he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 Yes and it was NONE OTHER THAN NAMELESS’s RECIPE
NameIess Posted June 1, 2022 Author Posted June 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, Boomerang Guy said: Yes and it was NONE OTHER THAN NAMELESS’s RECIPE THAT IS A LIE!
EmulatonStromenkiin he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 (edited) I am Afraid, Nameless, There is evidence against you. Regardless, @Boomerang Guy owns the recipe now, and we have not domain over such an unholy creation. Be forewarned, If you continue to produce any waffle-type with the same or similar recipe, We shall have to bring you to court on charges of mass murder and soul stealing. Furthermore, I need firsthand access to this evidence Edited June 1, 2022 by EmulatonStromenkiin
Ironwill2112 he/him Posted June 1, 2022 Posted June 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, EmulatonStromenkiin said: I am Afraid, Nameless, There is evidence against you. Regardless, @Boomerang Guy owns the recipe now, and we have not domain over such an unholy creation. Be forewarned, If you continue to produce any waffle-type with the same or similar recipe, We shall have to bring you to court on charges of mass murder and soul stealing. Furthermore, I need firsthand access to this evidence Granted. I have already scraped this recipe and have begone anew
NameIess Posted June 1, 2022 Author Posted June 1, 2022 34 minutes ago, Boomerang Guy said: BEHOLD THE EVIDENCE Yeah I only put spikes in the waffles. I wasn't being literal with the people thing. Apparently someone didn't listen to my recipe, which only included spikes taken only from horrible criminals.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now