Jump to content

Jo and the Bush

Members
  • Posts

    7556
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Jo and the Bush

  1. I'm going to start off by asking the Lurchers to NOT target me. The amount of discussion I'm inspiring is good, but useless. I'm an inquisitor. I've explained my plan, why I did what I did, and how I found out I had a flawed understanding of bronze. There's nothing else I can say on the subject. So I'd rather people focus on more important things, but I know that isn't going to happen while I'm alive. So to any coinshots out there, if you suspect me, and you have more than 2 charges, just kill me. Otherwise let's focus on other things. Sart, why is clanky's analysis suspicious? That happens literally every game, by both eliminators and villagers. Surviving Experienced players aleays come under suspicion. I'm inclined to think that meanderbrook is a inquisitor. His explanation matches up with what we saw, and since was online last cycle he would have received the pm with a link to his doc if he were a skaa. He probably would have posted to get suspicion off him. Lastly, inquisitors with emotional allomancy should save their allomancy until.later, so we don't run the risk of acidently hijacking a coinshot or soothing a seeker.
  2. Are we saying Durkon!Durkon or Vampire!Durkon? I agree with most of your list, except I would switch belkar and roy. Belkar can tame dinosaurs.
  3. Teamup or nightblood.
  4. Can aluminum be affected by surges? Can shards precognition view aluminun? Can Plastic be awakened with enough breaths? Can plastic be soulcast? Would an aluminum blade cut a shade?
  5. Anaylsis of someone visiting me: The only options are a lurcher, seeker, smoker or rioter. The skaa would have no reason to lurch me. My plan was no longer working, and I was rather suspicious. They would beore likely to ignore me and hope a coinshot took me out. The skaa would have no reason to smoke me either, since I'm a inquisitor. All that would do is defend me from being soothed, seeked or rioted. Rioting a player who had claimed to be a tineye is just a waste. I doubt anyone would choose to do so. A skaa seeker might choose to visit me, if they didn't believe I was a tineye, but mailliw spent a lot of time vouching for my honesty, and they knew he wasn't a skaa. So I choose to believe the person who visited me is a inquisitor. Unless someone can point out something Missed? Edit: ninja'd by clanka. Because we do to much anaylsis of eliminator kills in these games. The safest option is always to kill the most experianced players, unless you learn of a powerful role. That's why I fhink mailliw was a fear kill. And I said it was illogic, not logic, that made me want to vote for mailliw. Plus I added that if he was a inquisitor, I was the GM. I'm actually Gamma fiend!
  6. Yeah, I know I said I wanted to ensure a lynch, but I don't like lynching either of our current contenders. If it comes down to it, I'll be voting for ripple over meanderbrooks, but the typo thing is really a small bit of evidence. I've made typos like that on both sides. Oh, and retracting my vote on Sart, so that I don't have to worry about it later.
  7. That is a lovely question that many serious minds have failed to solve. Stormlight is carried in spheres, like the metal vials. But metal needs to be swallowed, while stoemlight just needs to be near you. They're very similar though.
  8. once Vin runs out of metals, she's bad at fighting. She's proven that twice now. Once Szeth runs out of metals, he's a martial artist master. So both of them have limited resources, but Szeth doesn't need his.
  9. Just say something like, a young street urchin discovers she has magical powers and uses them to over throw the government.
  10. That's the thing though, if we include OP things like atium and shards, then we already know Vin is going to win the entire tournament. Voting for combat skills alone is boring because of that.
  11. Szeth. He has the might of Taravangian and the Skybreakers behind him, and he has Nightblood.
  12. The part of my plan that had a flaw in it was held back. none of you knew about it until I spotted the flaw. You all knew that I hadn't posted my full plan, so saying means you either didn't read some of my posts, or simply didn't trust me. So, because you couldn't have seen the flaw. I'm wondering why you claimed you did.
  13. Mailliw has proven very good at reading me in the past. I honestly can't wait until I'm an eliminator again, so i can see if i can actually slip by him for once. My plan was just to ask in thread if a seeker who had seeked me would reveal if something other than Iron targeted me. If it was only iron, don't reveal. Was there a chance that no seekers would seek me? Yes. But it was the best plan I could come up with. 1) Nah. I don't trust anyone who supported, ignored, or opposed my plan. 2) Yes. that's a common eliminator tactic. they know who is innocent, so they know who to defend. 3) That could be true. I already revealed the plan. Hope a seeker targeted me. Lurchers can do what they want. I'm still going to burn, since I have no reason not to. I can vouch for this. He's very good at reading me. (Not vouching for his villageness though) I did indeed misread the rules. The first time I read them I was in the middle of a game of ToS, as the lookout. And what do you mean you saw the flaw? (I know you already explained what you meant, but that still makes no sense)
  14. I am highly amused by Jag's false assumptions. If Blackwave was pissed off at something like that, he wouldn't give two sparks about what Dragoon wants. Also, I don't tink they're in the warehouse any more. Blackwave met Journey and affinity there, then went somewhere else to meet dragoon.
×
×
  • Create New...